Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Minimally Invasive Surgery
Volume 2016, Article ID 5190152, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5190152
Research Article

Comparing Single and Dual Console Systems in the Robotic Surgical Training of Graduating OB/GYN Residents in the United States

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of South Florida, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL 33606, USA
2Department of Family and Community Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77098, USA

Received 20 October 2015; Revised 22 December 2015; Accepted 10 January 2016

Academic Editor: Diego Cuccurullo

Copyright © 2016 Emad Mikhail et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. M. Gobern, C. M. Novak, and E. G. Lockrow, “Survey of robotic surgery training in obstetrics and gynecology residency,” Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 755–760, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. A. L. Smith, E. M. Scott, T. C. Krivak, A. B. Olawaiye, T. Chu, and S. D. Richard, “Dual-console robotic surgery: a new teaching paradigm,” Journal of Robotic Surgery, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 113–118, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. H. S. Maniar, M. L. Council, S. M. Prasad, S. M. Prasad, C. Chu, and R. J. Damiano Jr., “Comparison of skill training with robotic systems and traditional endoscopy: implications on training and adoption,” The Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 125, no. 1, pp. 23–29, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. E. J. Hanly, B. E. Miller, R. Kumar et al., “Mentoring console improves collaboration and teaching in surgical robotics,” Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques Part A, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 445–451, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. P. C. Lim, E. Kang, and D. H. Park, “A comparative detail analysis of the learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy versus laparoscopic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in treatment of endometrial cancer: a case-matched controlled study of the first one hundred twenty two patients,” Gynecologic Oncology, vol. 120, no. 3, pp. 413–418, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. H. Liu, D. Lu, L. Wang, G. Shi, H. Song, and J. Clarke, “Robotic surgery for benign gynaecological disease,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 2, Article ID CD008978, 2012. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. S. Crusco, T. Jackson, and A. Advincula, “Comparing the da vinci si single console and dual console in teaching novice surgeons suturing techniques,” Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, vol. 18, no. 3, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  8. E. Fernandes, E. Elli, and P. Giulianotti, “The role of the dual console in robotic surgical training,” Surgery, vol. 155, no. 1, pp. 1–4, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. R. Wallenstein, C. V. Ananth, J. H. Kim et al., “Effect of surgical volume on outcomes for laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign indications,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 119, no. 4, pp. 709–716, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. C. Pitter, P. Anderson, A. Blissett, and N. Pemberton, “Robotic-assisted gynaecological surgery—establishing training criteria; minimizing operative time and blood loss,” The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 114–120, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. K. M. Doll, M. P. Milad, and D. R. Gossett, “Surgeon volume and outcomes in benign hysterectomy,” Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 554–561, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. AAGL Advancing Minimally Invasive Gynecology Worldwide, “Guidelines for privileging for robotic-assisted gynecologic laparoscopy,” Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 157–167, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar