Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Minimally Invasive Surgery
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 9814389, 5 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9814389
Research Article

Routine Cysticotomy and Flushing of the Cystic Duct in Patients with Low Risk of Common Duct Stones: Can It Be Beneficial?

1Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, General Surgery Clinic, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
2Department of General Surgery, “Azienda Ospedaliera dei Colli”, Monaldi Hospital, Naples, Italy

Correspondence should be addressed to Piera Leon; moc.liamg@5noelareip

Received 9 March 2017; Accepted 1 June 2017; Published 11 July 2017

Academic Editor: Casey M. Calkins

Copyright © 2017 Piera Leon et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. Costi, A. Gnocchi, F. Di Mario, and L. Sarli, “Diagnosis and management of choledocholithiasis in the golden age of imaging, endoscopy and laparoscopy,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 20, no. 37, pp. 13382–13401, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. L. Bencini, C. Tommasi, and R. Manetti, “Modern approach to cholecysto-choledocholithiasis,” World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 32–40, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  3. M. K. Li, C. N. Tang, and E. C. Lai, “Managing concomitant gallbladder stones and common bile duct stones in the laparoscopic era: a systematic review.,” Asian journal of endoscopic surgery, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 53–58, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. V. K. Bansal, M. C. Misra, K. Rajan et al., “Single-stage laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and cholecystectomy versus two-stage endoscopic stone extraction followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with concomitant gallbladder stones and common bile duct stones: a randomized controlled trial,” Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 875–885, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. B. V. Dasari, C. J. Tan, and K. S. Gurusamy, “Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones,” The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, vol. 9, article CD003327, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. J. Lu, Y. Cheng, X.-Z. Xiong, Y.-X. Lin, S.-J. Wu, and N.-S. Cheng, “Two-stage vs single-stage management for concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 18, no. 24, pp. 3156–3166, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. K. S. Gurusamy, V. Giljaca, and Y. Takwoingi, “Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography versus intraoperative cholangiography for diagnosis of common bile duct stones,” The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, vol. 2, article CD010339, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  8. E. Naumowicz, J. Białecki, and K. Kołomecki, “Results of treatment of patients with gallstone disease and ductal calculi by single-stage laparoscopic cholecystectomy and bile duct exploration,” Wideochirurgia I Inne Techniki Maloinwazyjne, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 179–189, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. A. A. ElGeidie, “Single-session minimally invasive management of common bile duct stones,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 20, no. 41, pp. 15144–15152, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. ASGE guidelines, “The role of endoscopy in the evaluation of suspected choledocolithiasis,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  11. G. Singhvi, R. Ampara, J. Baum et al., “ASGE guidelines result in cost-saving in the management of choledocolithiasis,” Ann Gastroenterol, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 85–90, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  12. M. R. Cox, J. P. O. Budge, and G. D. Eslick, “Timing and nature of presentation of unsuspected retained common bile duct stones after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective study,” Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 2033–2038, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. B. J. Ammori, K. Birbas, D. Davides, A. Vezakis, M. Larvin, and M. J. McMahon, “Routine vs ‘on demand’ postoperative ERCP for small bile duct calculi detected at intraoperative cholangiography. Clinical evaluation and cost analysis,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 1123–1126, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. E. Phillips, L. Daykhovsky, and B. Carroll, “Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: instrumentation and technique,” Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 3–15, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  15. S. B. Orenstein, J. M. Marks, and J. M. Hardacre, “Technical aspects of bile duct evaluation and exploration,” Surgical Clinics of North America, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 281–296, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. V. Giljiaca, K. S. Gurusamy, and Y. Takwoingi, “Endoscopic ultrasound versus magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for common bile duct stones,” The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, vol. 2, article CD011549, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  17. P. Li, Z. Zhang, J. Li, L. Jin, W. Han, and J. Zhang, “Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for secondary common bile duct stones compared with laparoscopic trans-cystic common bile duct exploration,” Medical Science Monitor, vol. 20, pp. 920–926, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. M. Moller, U. Gustafsson, F. Rasmussen, G. Persson, and A. Thorell, “Natural course vs interventions to clear common bile duct stones data from the swedish registry for gallstone surgery and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (gallriks),” JAMA Surgery, vol. 149, no. 10, pp. 1008–1014, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus