Clinical Study
Robotic-Assisted versus Conventional Laparoscopic Approach for Rectal Cancer Surgery, First Egyptian Academic Center Experience, RCT
Table 1
Patients demographic data and characteristics.
| | Robotic | Laparoscopic | p value | No. 21 | No. 24 |
| Age | 53.4 (32-67) | 50.3 (36-64) | 0.241 | Gender | | | 0.905 | Female | 10 (47.6%) | 11 (45.8%) | | Male | 11 (42.4%) | 13 (54.2%) | | MBI (kg/m2) | | | 0.329 | (i) < 30 | 10 (47.6%) | 08 (33.3%) | | (ii) >/= 30 | 11 (52.4%) | 16 (66.7%) | | ASA score | | | | (i) Healthy | 18 (85.7%) | 18 (75%) | | (ii) Mild systemic disease | 03 (14.3%) | 06 (25%) | | Distance from anal verge | (i) Upper rectum | 9 (42.9%) | 13 (54.2%) | | (ii) Middle rectum | 10 (47.6%) | 8 (33.3%) | | (iii) Lower rectum | 2 (9.5%) | 3 (12.%) | | Clinical stage | (i) I | 1 | 4 | | (ii) II | 15 | 17 | | (iii) III | 5 | 3 | | Preoperative chemoradiation | 12 (57.1%) | 11 (45.8%) | 0.449 | No residual lesion | 01 (4.8%) | 01 (4.1%) | |
|
|