Research Article

Comparison of Perioperative, Functional, and Oncological Outcomes of Transperitoneal and Extraperitoneal Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy

Table 6

Cox univariable and multivariable analyses.

VariableUnivariable analysisMultivariable analysis
HR95% Cl valueHR95% Cl value

Age (years)
 <70Ref0.0830.018
 ≥701.450.95, 2.21.711.1, 2.68
Clinical T stage
 T1-T2bRef<0.001<0.001
 T2c0.770.34, 1.740.530.22, 1.27
 T3a1.60.62, 4.120.950.33, 2.72
 T3b-T44.011.78, 9.051.820.65, 5.06
Initial PSA (ng/mL)
 ≤10Ref<0.001Ref0.609
 10–201.40.79, 2.481.240.69, 2.26
 >202.621.55, 4.461.360.73, 2.55
Gleason grade group
 1Ref<0.001
 21.650.84, 3.25
 32.911.53, 5.53
 44.582, 10.48
 58.334.25, 16.33
BMI (mg/m 2 )
 <25Ref0.313
 ≥251.240.82, 1.89
NCCN risk classification
 LowRef<0.001
 Intermediate0.810.24, 2.7
 High1.620.49, 5.37
 Very high5.641.73, 18.32
Margin status
 NegativeRef<0.001Ref0.046
 Positive2.761.78–3.851.521.01–2.29
LVI status
 NegativeRef<0.001
 Positive2.331.45, 3.73
Pathologic Gleason score
 6Ref<0.0010.021
 71.640.92, 2.911.390.74, 2.61
 ≥85.172.81, 9.52.711.28, 5.74
pT stage
 1-2cRef<0.001Ref<0.001
 3a1.930.99, 3.782.781.6–4.83
 3b-45.833.7, 9.185.153.07–8.64
 pN stage
 0Ref0.006Ref0.028
 13.061.53, 6.123.11.65–5.81
Technique
 IntraperitonealRef
 Transperitoneal1.120.7, 1.790.638

BMI; body mass index, NCCN; National Comprehensive Cancer Network, and LVI; lymphovascular invasion.