Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mobile Information Systems
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 1069581, 15 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1069581
Research Article

Study on Mobile Augmented Reality Adoption for Mayo Language Learning

1Departamento de Ingeniería Eléctrica y Computación, Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez, Ciudad Juárez, CHIH, Mexico
2Departamento de Ingeniería Industrial y Manufactura, Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez, Ciudad Juárez, CHIH, Mexico
3Departamento de Ciencias de la Computación, Centro de Investigación Científica y de Educación Superior de Ensenada, Ensenada, BC, Mexico

Received 20 April 2016; Revised 10 August 2016; Accepted 28 August 2016

Academic Editor: Juan C. Cano

Copyright © 2016 Erasmo Miranda Bojórquez et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. Surian, “Aprendizaje y competencias culturales,” Ra-Ximhai, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 205–222, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  2. H. P. Chia and A. Pritchard, “Using a virtual learning community (VLC) to facilitate a cross-national science research collaboration between secondary school students,” Computers and Education, vol. 79, pp. 1–15, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. R. House, P. Hanges, M. Javidan, P. Dorfman, and V. Gupta, Culture, Leadership, and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies, Sage Publications, 1st edition, 2004.
  4. G. Hofstede, G. J. Hofstede, and M. Minkov, Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 3rd edition, 2010.
  5. F. Trompenaars and C. Hampden Turner, Riding the Waves of Culture: Understanding Cultural Diversity in Business, Nicholas Brealey Publishing, 5th edition, 2011.
  6. V. Taras, P. Steel, and B. L. Kirkman, “Improving national cultural indices using a longitudinal meta-analysis of Hofstede's dimensions,” Journal of World Business, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 329–341, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. D. Potnis, “Culture's consequences: economic barriers to owning mobile phones experienced by women in India,” Telematics and Informatics, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 356–369, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. I. Khan, H. Al-Shihi, Z. A. Al-Khanjari, and M. Sarrab, “Mobile Learning (M-Learning) adoption in the Middle East: lessons learned from the educationally advanced countries,” Telematics and Informatics, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 909–920, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. I. Reychav, M. Dunaway, and M. Kobayashi, “Understanding mobile technology-fit behaviors outside the classroom,” Computers and Education, vol. 87, article 2836, pp. 142–150, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. Kearney, K. Burden, and T. Rai, “Investigating teachers' adoption of signature mobile pedagogies,” Computers & Education, vol. 80, pp. 48–57, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. L. Johnson, R. Smith, H. Willis, A. Levine, and K. Haywood, “The 2011 horizon report,” Tech. Rep., The New Media Consortium, Austin, Tex, USA, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  12. J. Martín-Gutiérrez, P. Fabiani, W. Benesova, M. D. Meneses, and C. E. Mora, “Augmented reality to promote collaborative and autonomous learning in higher education,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 51, pp. 752–761, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. R. T. Azuma, “A survey of augmented reality,” Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 355–385, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. N. S. Baron and E. M. Campbell, “Gender and mobile phones in cross-national context,” Language Sciences, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 13–27, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. S.-G. Lee, S. Trimi, and C. Kim, “The impact of cultural differences on technology adoption,” Journal of World Business, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 20–29, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. O. Viberg and Å. Grönlund, “Cross-cultural analysis of users' attitudes toward the use of mobile devices in second and foreign language learning in higher education: a case from Sweden and China,” Computers and Education, vol. 69, pp. 169–180, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. M. M. Al-Debei and E. Al-Lozi, “Explaining and predicting the adoption intention of mobile data services: a value-based approach,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 326–338, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. G. Baptista and T. Oliveira, “Understanding mobile banking: the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology combined with cultural moderators,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 50, pp. 418–430, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. K. Lee, “Augmented reality in education and training,” TechTrends, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 13–21, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. M. Billinghurst and A. Dünser, “Augmented reality in the classroom,” Computer, vol. 45, no. 7, Article ID 6171143, pp. 56–63, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. H.-K. Wu, S. W.-Y. Lee, H.-Y. Chang, and J.-C. Liang, “Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education,” Computers & Education, vol. 62, pp. 41–49, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. E. Klopfer and J. Sheldon, “Augmenting your own reality: student authoring of science-based augmented reality games,” New Directions for Youth Development, vol. 2010, no. 128, pp. 85–94, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. F. Ke and Y.-C. Hsu, “Mobile augmented-reality artifact creation as a component of mobile computer-supported collaborative learning,” The Internet and Higher Education, vol. 26, pp. 33–41, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. M. Dunleavy and C. Dede, “Handbook of research on educational communications and technology,” in Augmented Reality Teaching and Learning, pp. 735–745, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  25. J. Cheon, S. Lee, S. M. Crooks, and J. Song, “An investigation of mobile learning readiness in higher education based on the theory of planned behavior,” Computers and Education, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 1054–1064, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. F. D. Davis, “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 319–339, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. N. Marangunić and A. Granić, “Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013,” Universal Access in the Information Society, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 81–95, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. F. D. Davis, R. P. Bagozzi, and P. R. Warshaw, “User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models,” Management Science, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 982–1003, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. I.-F. Liu, M. C. Chen, Y. S. Sun, D. Wible, and C.-H. Kuo, “Extending the TAM model to explore the factors that affect intention to use an online learning community,” Computers & Education, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 600–610, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. A. Padilla-Meléndez, A. R. Del Aguila-Obra, and A. Garrido-Moreno, “Perceived playfulness, gender differences and technology acceptance model in a blended learning scenario,” Computers and Education, vol. 63, pp. 306–317, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. Y. Liu, H. Li, and C. Carlsson, “Factors driving the adoption of m-learning: An Empirical Study,” Computers and Education, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 1211–1219, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. T.-P. Liang and Y.-H. Yeh, “Effect of use contexts on the continuous use of mobile services: the case of mobile games,” Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 187–196, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. A.-C. Haugstvedt and J. Krogstie, “Mobile augmented reality for cultural heritage: a technology acceptance study,” in Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR '12), pp. 247–255, IEEE, Atlanta, Ga, USA, November 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. M. N. Giannakos, “Enjoy and learn with educational games: examining factors affecting learning performance,” Computers and Education, vol. 68, pp. 429–439, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. R. Wojciechowski and W. Cellary, “Evaluation of learners' attitude toward learning in ARIES augmented reality environments,” Computers and Education, vol. 68, pp. 570–585, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. J. Boase and R. Ling, “Measuring mobile phone use: self-report versus log data,” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 508–519, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. J. Arenas-Gaitán, P. E. Ramírez-Correa, and F. Javier Rondán-Cataluña, “Cross cultural analysis of the use and perceptions of web Based learning systems,” Computers and Education, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 1762–1774, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. G. Hofstede, “Values survey measure (VSM-2013),” 2013, http://www.geerthofstede.nl/vsm2013.
  39. A. R. Montazemi and H. Qahri-Saremi, “Factors affecting adoption of online banking: a meta-analytic structural equation modeling study,” Information & Management, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 210–226, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. J. C. Cronjé, “Using Hofstede's cultural dimensions to interpret cross-cultural blended teaching and learning,” Computers and Education, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 596–603, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. J. Hair, G. Hult, C. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt, A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), Sage, Los Angeles, Calif, USA, 1st edition, 2014. View at MathSciNet
  42. J. Henseler, C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt, “A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 115–135, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. W. Reinartz, M. Haenlein, and J. Henseler, “An empirical comparison of the efficacy of covariance-based and variance-based SEM,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 332–344, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. D. L. Goodhue, W. Lewis, and R. Thompson, “Does pls have advantages for small sample size or non-normal data?” MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 981–1001, 2012. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. J. Cohen, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 1998.