|
Scheme | Pros | Cons |
|
Counter | Easy implementation High % of informed vehicles | Originally proposed for MANETs High number of messages used |
|
Distance | Easy implementation Low number of messages | Low performance in urban environments |
|
eSBR | Good performance in different environments Improving distance results in terms of % of informed vehicles | GPS required |
|
eMDR | Improving eSBR Reducing the number of messages used | High precision GPS required Specially designed for urban environments |
|
NJL | High efficiency in urban scenarios Reduced number of messages used Aggressive broadcast storm reduction | High precision GPS required Useless in highway scenarios |
|
RTAD | Adaptive dissemination scheme High efficiency in different scenarios | Complex implementation GPS required |
|
FDPD | Recommended for highway scenarios Direction of vehicles is considered | GPS required Low performance in urban scenarios |
|
UV-CAST | Adaptive dissemination scheme Connecting disconnected subnetworks Reduced number of messages used | Low performance in urban scenarios |
|
DV-CAST | Adaptive dissemination scheme Good performance in terms of informed vehicles | GPS required Low reduction of messages |
|
JSF | Higher % of informed vehicles Specially indicated for simple maps | High number of messages used GPS required Overhead in high density conditions |
|
NSF | Highest % of informed vehicles Specially indicated for low density scenarios | High number of messages used Overhead in high density conditions |
|