Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mobile Information Systems
Volume 2017, Article ID 1328127, 15 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1328127
Research Article

ANT: Agent Stigmergy-Based IoT-Network for Enhanced Tourist Mobility

1Department of Communication and Information Technologies, Technical University of Cartagena, 30202 Cartagena, Spain
2AtlanTTIC, Universidade de Vigo, EI Telecomunicación, 36310 Vigo, Spain

Correspondence should be addressed to Pablo López-Matencio; se.tcpu@zepol.olbap

Received 28 April 2017; Revised 31 August 2017; Accepted 14 September 2017; Published 8 November 2017

Academic Editor: Paolo Bellavista

Copyright © 2017 Pablo López-Matencio et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. Eurostat, “Almost 8 out of 10 internet users in the eu surfed via a mobile or smart phone in 2016,” 2016, http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/.
  2. Pew Research Center, “Internet & Technology. Mobile fact sheet,” 2017, http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheet/mobile/.
  3. Waze, “Traffic maps and navegation by means of social interaction,” 2017, https://www.waze.com.
  4. “Heat maps for Foursquare application,” 2017, https://www.swarmapp.com/.
  5. E. Hornecker, S. Swindells, and M. Dunlop, “A mobile guide for serendipitous exploration of cities,” in Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, Mobile HCI 2011, pp. 557–562, swe, September 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. P.-P. Grassé, “La reconstruction du nid et les coordinations interindividuelles chez Bellicositermes natalensis et Cubitermes sp. la théorie de la stigmergie: Essai d'interprétation du comportement des termites constructeurs,” Insectes Sociaux, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 41–80, 1959. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. Dorigo, E. Bonabeau, and G. Theraulaz, “Ant algorithms and stigmergy,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 851–871, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. D. Gavalas, M. Kenteris, C. Konstantopoulos, and G. Pantziou, “Personalized routes for mobile tourism,” in Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE 7th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications, WiMob'2011, pp. 295–300, chn, October 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. D. Gavalas and M. Kenteris, “A web-based pervasive recommendation system for mobile tourist guides,” Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 759–770, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. W. Wörndl, A. Hefele, and D. Herzog, “Recommending a sequence of interesting places for tourist trips,” Information Technology & Tourism, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 31–54, 2017. View at Google Scholar
  11. D. Herzog, H. Massoud, and W. Wörndl, “Routeme: A mobile recommender system for personalized, multi-modal route planning,” in Proceedings of the 25th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization, pp. 67–75, ACM, 2017.
  12. Zheng. W., Liao. Z., and J. Qin, “Using a four-step heuristic algorithm to design personalized day tour route within a tourist attraction,” Tourism Management, vol. 62, pp. 335–349, 2017. View at Google Scholar
  13. A. Gionis, T. Lappas, K. Pelechrinis, and E. Terzi, “Customized tour recommendations in urban areas,” in Proceedings of the 7th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, WSDM 2014, pp. 313–322, usa, February 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. A. Awal, J. Rabbi, S. I. Hossain, and M. M. A. Hashem, “A hybrid approach to plan itinerary for tourists,” in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Informatics, Electronics and Vision, ICIEV 2016, pp. 219–223, bgd, May 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. Y. Kurata, Y. Shinagawa, and T. Hara, “CT-Planner5: a computer-aided tour planning service which profits both tourists and destinations,” in Proceedings of the Tourism Recommender Systems, vol. volume 15, RecSys, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  16. C. Zhu, J. Q. Hu, F. Wang, Y. Xu, and R. Cao, “On the tour planning problem,” Annals of Operations Research, vol. 192, pp. 67–86, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  17. W.-S. Yang and S.-Y. Hwang, “ITravel: a recommender system in mobile peer-to-peer environment,” The Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 12–20, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. K. Meehan, T. Lunney, K. Curran, and A. McCaughey, “Context-aware intelligent recommendation system for tourism,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom '13), pp. 328–331, IEEE, San Diego, Calif, USA, March 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. I. Cenamor, T. de la Rosa, S. Núñez, and D. Borrajo, “Planning for tourism routes using social networks,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 69, no. ISSN 0957-4174, pp. 1–9, 2017, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957417416305693. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. F. Ricci, B. Arslan, N. Mirzadeh, and A. Venturini, “Itr: a case-based travel advisory system,” in Proceedings of the European Conference on Case-Based Reasoning, pp. 613–627, Springer, 2002.
  21. A. Yahi, A. Chassang, L. Raynaud, H. Duthil, and D. H. Chau, “Aurigo: An interactive tour planner for personalized itineraries,” in Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, IUI 2015, pp. 275–285, usa, April 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. L. Baltrunas, B. Ludwig, S. Peer, and F. Ricci, “Context relevance assessment and exploitation in mobile recommender systems,” Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 507–526, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. F. Martínez-Santiago, F. Ariza-López, A. Montejo-Ráez, and A. Ureña-López, “GeOasis: a knowledge-based geo-referenced tourist assistant,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 39, no. 14, pp. 11737–11745, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. J. Rasinger, M. Fuchs, T. Beer, and W. Höpken, “Building a mobile tourist guide based on tourists' on-site information needs,” Tourism Analysis, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 483–502, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. P. Kourouthanassis, C. Boletsis, C. Bardaki, and D. Chasanidou, “Tourists responses to mobile augmented reality travel guides: the role of emotions on adoption behavior,” Pervasive and Mobile Computing, vol. 18, pp. 71–87, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. D. McGookin, S. Brewster, and P. Priego, “Audio bubbles: Employing non-speech audio to support tourist wayfinding,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics): Preface, vol. 5763, pp. 41–50, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. R. A. Abbaspour and F. Samadzadegan, “Time-dependent personal tour planning and scheduling in metropolises,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 12439–12452, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. J. Karbowska-Chilinska and P. Zabielski, “Genetic algorithm solving the orienteering problem with time windows,” Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 240, pp. 609–619, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. S.-W. Lin and V. F. Yu, “A simulated annealing heuristic for the multiconstraint team orienteering problem with multiple time windows,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 37, pp. 632–642, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. P. Vansteenwegen, W. Souffriau, and D. Van Oudheusden, “The orienteering problem: a survey,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 209, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  31. D. Gavalas, C. Konstantopoulos, K. Mastakas, and G. Pantziou, “A survey on algorithmic approaches for solving tourist trip design problems,” Journal of Heuristics, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 291–328, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. M. Rey-López, A. B. Barragáns-Martínez, A. Peleteiro, F. A. Mikic-Fonte, and J. C. Burguillo, “moreTourism: mobile recommendations for tourism,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE '11), pp. 347-348, Las Vegas, Nev, USA, January 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. I. Garcia, L. Sebastià, and E. Onaindia, “On the design of individual and group recommender systems for tourism,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 7683–7692, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. N. S. Savage, M. Baranski, N. E. Chavez, and T. Höllerer, “I’m feeling LoCo: A location based context aware recommendation system,” in Advances in Location-Based Services, pp. 37–54, Springer, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  35. E. Forcael, V. González, F. Orozco, S. Vargas, A. Pantoja, and P. Moscoso, “Ant Colony Optimization Model for Tsunamis Evacuation Routes,” Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. O. Zedadra, H. Seridi, N. Jouandeau, and G. Fortino, “S-MASA: A stigmergy based algorithm for multi-target search,” in Proceedings of the 2014 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems, FedCSIS 2014, pp. 1477–1485, pol, September 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. K. Sastry, D. E. Goldberg, and G. Kendall, “Genetic algorithms,” in Search methodologies, pp. 93–117, Springer, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  38. S. Liu, “A hybrid population heuristic for the heterogeneous vehicle routing problems,” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, vol. 54, pp. 67–78, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. C. Gahm, C. Brabänder, and A. Tuma, “Vehicle routing with private fleet, multiple common carriers offering volume discounts, and rental options,” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, vol. 97, pp. 192–216, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. H. Savuran and M. Karakaya, “Efficient route planning for an unmanned air vehicle deployed on a moving carrier,” Soft Computing, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 2905–2920, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. N. M. Razali, J. Geraghty et al., “Genetic algorithm performance with different selection strategies in solving TSP,” in Proceedings of the world congress on engineering, vol. 2, pp. 1134–1139, 2011.
  42. C. Torney, Z. Neufeld, and I. D. Couzin, “Context-dependent interaction leads to emergent search behavior in social aggregates,” Proceedings of the National Acadamy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, no. 52, pp. 22055–22060, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. P. De Frenne, B. J. Graae, F. Rodríguez-Sánchez et al., “Latitudinal gradients as natural laboratories to infer species' responses to temperature,” Journal of Ecology, vol. 101, no. 3, pp. 784–795, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. J. L. Kirschvink, “Sensory biology: Radio waves zap the biomagnetic compass,” Nature, vol. 509, no. 7500, pp. 296-297, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. R. A. Ramos, J. Zapata, C. A. Condat, and T. S. Deisboeck, “Modeling cancer immunotherapy: assessing the effects of lymphocytes on cancer cell growth and motility,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, vol. 392, no. 10, pp. 2415–2425, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  46. U. Wilensky, Netlogo. Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL., USA, 1999.
  47. G. Boeing, “OSMnx: New methods for acquiring, constructing, analyzing, and visualizing complex street networks,” Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, vol. 65, pp. 126–139, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar