Research Article
Online Signature Verification on MOBISIG Finger-Drawn Signature Corpus
Table 10
Verification performance in terms of EER and averaged individual EER
for the DooDB database using anomaly detectors and 56 features (%).
| | Detector | Skilled forgeries | Random forgeries | | EER | aEER (std dev.) | EER | aEER (std dev.) |
| | Enrollment: 5 samples | | Eucl. | 34.69 | 30.98 (17.91) | 17.98 | 9.97 (11.95) | | Manh. | 31.24 | 25.29 (18.16) | 13.38 | 5.11 (7.29) | | kNN | 35.33 | 31.42 (17.76) | 18.58 | 10.29 (12.26) | | SVM | 35.6 | 31.73 (17.86) | 27.74 | 10.84 (11.93) |
| | Enrollment: 10 samples | | Eucl. | 27.632 | 24.63 (17.59) | 12.20 | 7.61 (10.81) | | Manh. | 24.45 | 20.22 (16.49) | 9.80 | 4.56 (7.08) | | kNN | 27.44 | 24.47 (17.74) | 11.82 | 7.55 (10.33) | | SVM | 27.14 | 24.66 (17.38) | 12.60 | 7.55 (10.79) |
| | Enrollment: 15 samples | | Eucl. | 23.48 | 20.98 (16.05) | 10.32 | 6.76 (10.28) | | Manh. | 21.71 | 18.75 (16.66) | 7.82 | 4.19 (7.24) | | kNN | 24.25 | 20.83 (16.19) | 10.10 | 7.07 (10.43) | | SVM | 23.26 | 20.85 (16.07) | 10.40 | 6.97 (10.39) |
|
|
