Online Signature Verification on MOBISIG Finger-Drawn Signature Corpus

Table 4

Verification performance in terms of EER and averaged individual EER for the MOBISIG database using DTW and local features (%).

Features	Skilled forgeries		Random forgeries
	EER	aEER (std dev.)	EER	aEER (std dev.)
	Enrollment: 5 samples
(i)	25.45	14.72 (14.62)	2.12	0.32 (1.29)
(ii)	31.37	11.42 (14.64)	1.75	0.00 (0.00)
(iii)	42.92	24.72 (21.46)	22.21	3.34 (9.27)
(iv)	32.02	10.28 (14.72)	3.18	0.10 (0.71)
(v)	31.52	8.56 (11.50)	4.51	0.18 (1.00)
	Enrollment: 10 samples
(i)	22.71	12.10 (13.98)	1.91	0.34 (1.31)
(ii)	28.87	8.60 (11.99)	1.41	0.01 (0.07)
(iii)	42.66	20.43 (18.34)	20.61	1.81 (3.52)
(iv)	30.35	6.80 (12.17)	2.55	0.01 (0.09)
(v)	29.97	6.69 (10.05)	4.09	0.16 (0.99)
	Enrollment: 15 samples
(i)	20.82	10.77 (13.29)	1.76	0.27 (1.18)
(ii)	27.15	7.34 (11.53)	1.68	0.01 (0.07)
(iii)	42.13	18.74 (17.49)	20.14	1.70 (3.60)
(iv)	29.79	6.27 (11.54)	2.62	0.01 (0.09)
(v)	29.76	5.81 (9.64)	4.27	0.15 (0.98)