Research Article
Online Signature Verification on MOBISIG Finger-Drawn Signature Corpus
Table 5
Verification performance in terms of EER and averaged individual EER
for the MOBISIG database using anomaly detectors and 62 features (%).
| | Detector | Skilled forgeries | Random forgeries | | EER | aEER (std dev.) | EER | aEER (std dev.) |
| | Enrollment: 5 samples | | Eucl. | 22.99 | 18.95 (15.81) | 12.24 | 7.43 (9.13) | | Manh. | 19.27 | 13.57 (12.43) | 7.28 | 3.60 (5.21) | | kNN | 21.68 | 17.19 (15.22) | 11.85 | 6.96 (8.46) | | SVM | 29.81 | 18.34 (15.66) | 25.78 | 7.61 (9.52) |
| | Enrollment: 10 samples | | Eucl. | 20.12 | 13.78 (12.84) | 9.18 | 5.80 (8.99) | | Manh. | 16.58 | 10.82 (11.73) | 5.37 | 2.60 (4.72) | | kNN | 18.40 | 13.35 (12.62) | 8.63 | 5.80 (8.90) | | SVM | 19.93 | 14.03 (12.98) | 10.59 | 5.80 (8.90) |
| | Enrollment: 15 samples | | Eucl. | 17.11 | 12.14 (12.60) | 8.69 | 5.01 (8.47) | | Manh. | 14.31 | 9.35 (11.28) | 5.21 | 2.10 (4.01) | | kNN | 17.25 | 12.15 (12.21) | 9.14 | 5.00 (8.87) | | SVM | 17.35 | 12.45 (12.84) | 9.00 | 5.00 (8.57) |
|
|
