Research Article

Towards the Design of Context-Aware Adaptive User Interfaces to Minimize Drivers’ Distractions

Table 4

Descriptive statistics.

Usability parametersVariables (questions)ScalesFrequencyPercentages

AttitudeATTD1, ATTD2, ATTD3, ATTD4Definitely2931.18
Very probably5660.82
Probably077.53
Possibly011.08
Definitely not

Intention to useITU1, ITU2, ITU3, ITU4Definitely2729.03
Very probably4649.46
Probably1920.43
Possibly011.08
Definitely not

Perceived usefulnessPDU1, PDU2, PDU3, PDU4, PDU5, PDU6Strongly agree1212.90
Agree6569.89
Probably1617.20
Possibly
Strongly disagree

Understandability and learnabilityUAL1, UAL2Much higher4043.01
Higher4548.39
About the same088.60
Lower
Much lower

OperabilityOPT1, OPT2, OPT3, OPT4, OPT5, OPT6, OPT7, OPT8, OPT9, OPT10, OPT11Very satisfied066.45
Satisfied7580.65
Neither1212.90
Dissatisfied
Very dissatisfied

Ease of useEOU1, EOU2, EOU3, EOU4, EOU5, EOU6, EOU7, EOU8Strongly agree099.68
Agree7277.42
Probably1212.90
Possibly
Strongly disagree

System usability scale (SUS)SUS1, SUS2, SUS3, SUS4, SUS5, SUS6, SUS7Strongly agree0718.28
Agree6974.19
Probably1718.28
Possibly
Strongly disagree

Minimal memory loadMML1, MML2, MML3, MML4, MML5, MML6, MML7, MML8Agree strongly077.53
Agree moderately8288.17
Agree slightly044.30
Disagree moderately
Disagree strongly

Minimal visual interactionMVI1, MVI2, MVI3, MVI4Agree strongly1313.98
Agree moderately5963.44
Agree slightly2122.58
Disagree moderately
Disagree strongly

Minimal physical interactionMPI1, MPI2Agree strongly1819.35
Agree moderately4548.39
Agree slightly2830.11
Disagree moderately022.15
Disagree strongly

User satisfactionUS1, US2, US3, US4, US5Extremely satisfied2021.51
Very satisfied6266.67
Moderately satisfied1111.83
Slightly satisfied
Not at all satisfied