|
Factor (factor name) | Correlated factor (factor name) | Pearson’s r |
|
f11 (requirements analysis) | f12 (relationship of detailed design to requirement) | 0.656 |
f13 (work standards) | 0.598 |
f10 (design methodology) | 0.541 |
f17 (development team size) | 0.491 |
f14 (development management) | 0.464 |
f18 (program workload (stress)) | 0.451 |
f6 (percentage of reused modules) | 0.421 |
f9 (volume of program design documents) | 0.412 |
f25 (testing coverage) | 0.400 |
|
f15 (programmer skill) | f19 (domain knowledge) | 0.629 |
f3 (difficulty of programming) | 0.533 |
f20 (human nature) | 0.423 |
|
f12 (relationship of detailed design to requirement) | f11 (requirements analysis) | 0.656 |
f10 (design methodology) | 0.406 |
|
f20 (human nature) | f7 (programming language) | 0.453 |
f14 (development management) | 0.439 |
f15 (programmer skill) | 0.423 |
f16 (programmer organization) | 0.407 |
|
f22 (testing effort) | f25 (testing coverage) | 0.741 |
f24 (testing methodologies) | 0.728 |
f27 (documentation) | 0.438 |
f28 (processors) | −0.419 |
|
f25 (testing methodologies) | f25 (testing coverage) | 0.843 |
F22 (testing effort) | 0.728 |
f27 (documentation) | 0.659 |
F26 (testing tools) | 0.503 |
f23 (testing resource allocation) | 0.420 |
f28 (processors) | −0.419 |
|
f18 (program workload (stress)) | f14 (development management) | 0.453 |
f11 (requirements analysis) | 0.451 |
f5 (level of programming technologies) | 0.449 |
f13 (work standards) | 0.414 |
|
f6 (percentage of reused modules) | f11 (requirements analysis) | 0.421 |
f10 (design methodology) | 0.414 |
|
f19 (domain knowledge) | F15 (programmer skill) | 0.629 |
f3 (difficulty of programming) | 0.426 |
f5 (level of programming technologies) | 0.426 |
|
f7 (programming language) | f20 (human nature) | 0.453 |
f14 (development management) | 0.411 |
f17 (development team size) | 0.403 |
|