Research Article

A Comprehensive Convolutional Neural Network Survey to Detect Glaucoma Disease

Table 1

Review of OCT and fundus imaging for glaucoma diagnosis.

YearImage modalityFeaturesMethodDatasetAccuracy

2016FundusOptic disc, cup-to-disc ratio [17]Wavelet feature extraction score normalizationLocal database, 63 images94.7%
2017FundusOptic disc, vessel map, vessel component [19]Morphological operation for glaucoma detection10 publicly available datasets; only HRF provides center ground truth99.49%
2016FundusCDR, texture feature, color moments, intensity [21]Wavelet, multiwavelet binary pattern, Grey cooccurrence matrix50 fundus images taken from local dataset87%
2016FundusOptic disc, CDR, regional image feature [22]Gaussian filter bank,RIMONE, SLO93.9%
2020OCTDisc area, cup area, CDR, RNFL thickness [23]Hazard models along with OCTPrivateDisc area: 0.008 ( value); RNFL thickness 0.003 ( value)
2017SDOCTGCLIP thickness [24]Macula by SAP, GCA, Z-testPrivate: 127 eyes images of 80 participants75, 0.65
2016OCTARNFL thickness, capillary density [25]Layer segmentation methodPrivate dataset: 67 images94%
2018SDOCTInner macular layer thickness, inner retinal layer thickness [26]Spectralis OCTPrivate: 148 eyes of patients (Spain and Belgium Hospital)42.2%
88.9%