Ecological Integrity Evaluation of Organically Evolved Cultural Landscape

Table 6

Evaluation rules of cultural ecological integrity from the perspective of space opening.

Evaluation criteria	Evaluation factor	Evaluation weight (pi^f)	Description of evaluation indicators (fi^f)
Sustainability of surrounding sites (B2)	Natural calamities	0.18	Taking the occurrence frequency of earthquakes with magnitude greater than 4 as the characteristic of dominant disasters, the lower the frequency, the higher the corresponding index value. Similar evaluation methods shall be adopted for other related natural disasters
	Ecological vulnerability	0.15	The ecological stability of cultural landscape is evaluated from the five ecosystems of cold and drought, grassland, agriculture and animal husbandry, farming and forest, so as to ensure the ecological integrity of the whole cultural landscape
	Accessibility	0.38	The evaluation standard of accessibility index is mainly based on the sustainable impact of traffic on cultural landscape, taking it as a reference, taking advanced modern traffic as the highest level, simple modern traffic as the second level, human and animal power buffer as the third level, and human and animal power as the fourth level directly
	Forest cover	0.1	Based on forest coverage
	Number of residents	0.19	Determined according to the size and amount of landscape influence