Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2006, Article ID 85103, 24 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/MPE/2006/85103

Modelling and analysis of a network organization for cooperation of manufacturers on production capacity

Graduate School of Business, Koç University, Rumelifeneri Yolu Saryer, Istanbul 34450, Turkey

Received 28 November 2005; Accepted 2 January 2006

Copyright © 2006 Bariş Tan. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. D. R. Beil and L. M. Wein, “An inverse-optimization-based auction mechanism to support a multi-attribute RFQ process,” Management Science, vol. 49, no. 11, pp. 1529–1545, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  2. J. R. Bradley, “Optimal control of a dual service rate M/M/1 production-inventory model,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 161, no. 3, pp. 812–837, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  3. F. Chen, “Auctioning supply contracts,” Working paper, Columbia University, New York, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  4. S. Dasgupta and D. F. Spulber, “Managing procurement auctions,” Information Economics and Policy, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 5–29, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. R. G. Eccles and D. B. Crane, “Managing through networks in investment banking,” California Management Review, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 176–195, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  6. W. Elmaghraby, “Supply contract competition and sourcing policies,” Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 350–371, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. J. Gallien and L. M. Wein, “A smart market for industrial procurement with capacity constraints,” Management Science, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 76–91, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. P. Ghemawat and C. Fritz Foley, “Cooperating to compete: egs of Turkey,” Tech. Rep. 9-799-024, Harvard Business School Case, Massachusetts, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  9. G. Hamel, Y. L. Doz, and C. K. Prahalad, “Collaborate with your competitors—and win,” Harvard Business Review, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 133–139, 1989. View at Google Scholar
  10. W. T. Huh and R. O. Roundy, “Using auctions for procurement,” Tech. Rep. 1355, School of Operations Research and Industrial Engineering, Cornell University, New York, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  11. M. Jin and D. Wu, “Procurement auction with supplier coalition: validity requirements and mechanism design,” 2003, http://www.lehigh.edu/~sdw1/jin2.pdf.
  12. R. Johnston and P. R. Lawrence, “Beyond vertical integration—the rise of the value-adding partnership,” Harvard Business Review, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 94–101, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  13. P. Klemperer, “Auction theory: a guide to the literature,” Journal of Economic Surveys, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 227–286, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. T. V. Köppl and C. Monnet, “Guess what: it's the settlements,” Working paper 375, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  15. V. Krishna, Auction Theory, Academic Press, California, 2002.
  16. K. Kumar, H. G. van Dissel, and P. Bielle, “The merchant of Prato-revisited: towards a third rationality of information systems,” Management Information Systems Quarterly, pp. 1–37, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  17. I. Mezgár, G. Kovács, and P. Paganelli, “Co-operative production planning for small- and medium-sized enterprises,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 64, no. 1–3, pp. 37–48, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  18. M. Nandula and S. P. Dutta, “Performance evaluation of an auction-based manufacturing system using coloured petri nets,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 2155–2171, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  19. N. Nisan and A. Ronen, “Algorithmic mechanism design,” Games and Economic Behavior, vol. 35, no. 1-2, pp. 166–196, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  20. B. Tan and S. B. Gershwin, “Production and subcontracting strategies for manufacturers with limited capacity and volatile demand,” Annals of Operations Research, vol. 125, no. 1–4, pp. 205–232, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  21. Y. Vakrat and A. Seidmann, “Implications of the bidders' arrival process on the design of online auctions,” in Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaian International Conference on Systems Sciences, pp. 1–10, Hawaii, 2000.
  22. M. Van Alstyne, “The state of network organization: a survey in three frameworks,” Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, vol. 7, no. 2&3, pp. 83–151, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. D. Veeramani and K. J. Wang, “Performance analysis of auction-based distributed shop-floor control schemes from the perspective of the communication system,” International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 121–143, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. M. P. Wellman, W. E. Walsh, P. R. Wurman, and J. K. MacKie-Mason, “Auction protocols for decentralized scheduling,” Games and Economic Behavior, vol. 35, no. 1-2, pp. 271–303, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet