Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2007, Article ID 31267, 20 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2007/31267
Research Article

Stabilizability and Motion Tracking Conditions for Mechanical Nonholonomic Control Systems

Institute of Aircraft Engineering and Applied Mechanics, Warsaw University of Technology, Nowowiejska 24 str., Warsaw 00-665, Poland

Received 28 September 2006; Revised 5 February 2007; Accepted 17 April 2007

Academic Editor: José Manoel Balthazar

Copyright © 2007 Elżbieta Jarzębowska. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. M. Bloch, P. S. Krishnaprasad, J. E. Marsden, and R. M. Murray, “Nonholonomic mechanical systems with symmetry,” Tech. Rep. CIT/CDS 94-013, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, Calif, USA, 1994.
  2. A. M. Bloch, Nonholonomic Mechanics and Control, vol. 24 of Interdisciplinary Applied Mathematics, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2003. View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  3. R. N. Murray, Z. X. Li, and S. S. Sastry, “A Mathematical Introduction to Robotic Manipulation,” CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 1994. View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  4. J. G. Papastavridis, Analytical Mechanics: A Comprehensive Treatise on the Dynamics of Constrained Systems; for Engineers, Physicists, and Mathematicians, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA, 2002. View at Zentralblatt MATH
  5. E. Jarzębowska, “On derivation of motion equations for systems with nonholonomic high-order program constraints,” Multibody System Dynamics, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 307–329, 2002. View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  6. E. Jarzębowska, “Dynamics modeling of nonholonomic mechanical systems: theory and applications,” Nonlinear Analysis, vol. 63, no. 5–7, pp. e185–e197, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. E. Jarzębowska, “Model-based control strategies for systems with constraints of the program type,” Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 606–623, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  8. S. Martinez, J. Cortez, and F. Bullo, “Motion planning and control problems for underactuated robots,” in Control Problems in Robotics, A. Bicchi, H. I. Christensen, and D. Prattichizzo, Eds., Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics, pp. 59–74, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2003. View at Zentralblatt MATH
  9. M. Reyhanoglu, A. van der Schaft, N. H. McClamroch, and I. Kolmanovsky, “Nonlinear control of a class of underactuated systems,” in Proceedings of the 35th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, vol. 2, pp. 1682–1687, Kobe, Japan, December 1996.
  10. B.-S. Chen, T.-S. Lee, and W.-S. Chang, “A robust H model reference tracking design for non-holonomic mechanical control systems,” International Journal of Control, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 283–306, 1996. View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  11. A. Isidori, Nonlinear Control Systems, Communications and Control Engineering Series, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2nd edition, 1989. View at MathSciNet
  12. X. Yun and N. Sarkar, “Unified formulation of robotic systems with holonomic and nonholonomic constraints,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 640–650, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. M. Ishikawa and M. Sampei, “Necessary conditions for feedback stabilizability based on qualities of equilibria set,” in Proceedings of the 37th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC '98), vol. 4, pp. 4600–4601, Tampa, Fla, USA, December 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. M. Ishikawa and M. Sampei, “Classification of nonholonomic systems from mechanical and control-theoretical viewpoints,” in Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS '00), vol. 1, pp. 121–126, Takamatsu, Japan, October-November 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. R. W. Brockett, “Asymptotic stability and feedback stabilization,” in Differential Geometric Control Theory (Houghton, Mich, 1982), R. W. Brockett, R. S. Milman, and H. J. Sussmann, Eds., vol. 27 of Progr. Math., pp. 181–191, Birkhäuser, Boston, Mass, USA, 1983. View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  16. E. Jarzębowska, “Robot motion planning in the presence of program constraints,” in Proceedings of the 7th IFAC Symposium on Robot Control (SYROCO '03), vol. 1, pp. 117–122, Elsevier, Wroclaw, Poland, September 2003.
  17. E. Jarzębowska, “Control oriented dynamic formulation for robotic systems with program constraints,” Robotica, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 61–73, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. J.-P. Laumond, Ed., Robot Motion Planning and Control, vol. 229 of Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, Springer, London, UK, 1998. View at MathSciNet
  19. G. Oriolo, A. De Luca, and M. Vendittelli, “WMR control via dynamic feedback linearization: design, implementation, and experimental validation,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 835–852, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. M. Giergiel et al., Modeling and Control of Wheeled Robots, PWN, Warsaw, Poland, 2002.
  21. E. Jarzębowska, “Tracking control design for underactuated constrained systems,” Robotica, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 591–593, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. W. Chung, Nonholonomic Manipulators, vol. 13 of Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2004. View at Zentralblatt MATH
  23. N. Hogan, “An organizing principle for a class of voluntary movements,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 4, no. 11, pp. 2745–2754, 1984.
  24. F. Bullo and A. D. Lewis, “Kinematic controllability and motion planning for the snakeboard,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 494–498, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. J. Ostrowski, J. P. Desai, and V. Kumar, “Optimal gait selection for nonholonomic locomotion systems,” in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA '97), vol. 1, pp. 786–791, Albuquerque, NM, USA, April 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. E. Jarzębowska and R. Lewandowski, “Modeling and control design using the Boltzmann-Hamel equations: a roller-racer example,” in Proceedings of the 8th International IFAC Symposium on Robot Control (SYROCO '06), Bologna, Italy, September 2006.
  27. P. S. Krishnaprasad and D. P. Tsakiris, “Oscillations, SE(2)-snakes and motion control: a study of the roller racer,” Dynamical Systems, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 347–397, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  28. S. Chitta, F. W. Heger, and V. Kumar, “Design and gait control of a rollerblading robot,” in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA '04), vol. 4, pp. 3944–3949, New Orleans, La, USA, April-May 2004.
  29. S. Hirose and H. Takeuchi, “Study on roller-walk (basic characteristics and its control),” in Proceedings of the 13th IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA '96), vol. 4, pp. 3265–3270, Minneapolis, Minn, USA, April 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. H. Date, Y. Hoshi, and M. Sampei, “Locomotion control of a snake-like robot based on dynamic manipulability,” in Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS '00), vol. 3, pp. 2236–2241, Takamatsu, Japan, October-November 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  31. S. Hirose and A. Morishima, “Design and control of a mobile robot with an articulated body,” International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 99–114, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. L. S. Crawford and S. S. Sastry, “Biological motor control approaches for a planar diver,” in Proceedings of the 34th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC '95), vol. 4, pp. 3881–3886, New Orleans, La, USA, December 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. P. Rouchon, P. Martin, and R. M. Murray, “Flat systems, equivalence and trajectory generation,” Tech. Rep. CDS 2003-008, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, Calif, USA, 2003.
  34. E. Jarzębowska and N. H. McClamroch, “On nonlinear control of the Ishlinsky system as an example of a nonholonomic non-Chaplygin system,” in Proceedings of the American Control Conference, vol. 5, pp. 3249–3253, Chicago,Ill, USA, June 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. T.-J. Tarn, M. Zhang, and A. Serrani, “New integrability conditions for differential constraints,” Systems & Control Letters, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 335–345, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  36. E. Jarzębowska, “Model-based reference tracking with kinematic specifications of programmed motion,” in Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Conference on Methods and Models in Automation and Robotics (MMAR '05), pp. 603–608, Miedzyzdroje, Poland, August-September 2005.
  37. F. L. Lewis, C. T. Abdallah, and D. M. Dawson, Control of Robot Manipulators, Theory and Practice, Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, USA, 2004.