Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2009, Article ID 510759, 22 pages
Research Article

Some Initial Conditions for Disposed Satellites of the Systems GPS and Galileo Constellations

1Departamento de Estatística, Matemática Aplicada e Computação, IGCE, UNESP campus Rio Claro, Caixa Postal 178, CEP: 13506-900 Rio Claro, SP, Brazil
2Departamento de Física, IGCE, UNESP campus Rio Claro, CEP: 13506-900 Rio Claro, SP, Brazil
3Departamento de Física, Centro de Ciências Exatas e Tecnológicas, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, UFV, CEP: 36571-000 Viçosa, MG, Brazil

Received 31 July 2009; Accepted 20 October 2009

Academic Editor: Silvia Maria Giuliatti Winter

Copyright © 2009 Diogo Merguizo Sanchez et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. ESA, “Galileo: Mission High Level Definition,” 2002,
  2. NASA, “Guidelines and assessment procedures for limiting orbital debris,” NASA Safety Standard 1740.14, Office of Safety and Mission Assurance, Washington, DC, USA, 1995.
  3. A. B. Jenkin and R. A. Gick, “Collision risk posed to the global positioning system by disposed upper stages,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 1412–1418, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. A. B. Jenkin and R. A. Gick, “Dilution of disposal orbit collision risk for the medium earth orbit constellations,” The Astronomical Journal, vol. 126, pp. 398–429, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  5. D. Brouwer and G. M. Clemence, Methods of Celestial Mechanics, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1961. View at MathSciNet
  6. G. Hori, “Theory of general perturbation with unspecified canonical variable,” Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, vol. 18, pp. 287–296, 1966. View at Google Scholar
  7. H. Kinoshita and H. Nakai, “Secular perturbations of fictitious satellites of uranus,” Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 293–303, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. T. Yokoyama, “Dynamics of some fictitious satellites of Venus and Mars,” Planetary and Space Science, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 619–627, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. Y. Kozai, “The motion of a close earth satellite,” The Astronomical Journal, vol. 64, pp. 367–377, 1959. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  10. T. Yokoyama, “Possible effects of secular resonances in Phobos and Triton,” Planetary and Space Science, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 63–77, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. C. Lánczos, The Variational Principles of Mechanics, Mathematical Expositions, no. 4, University of Toronto Press, Toronto, Canada, 4th edition, 1970. View at MathSciNet
  12. B. D. Tapley, M. M. Watkins, J. C. Ries et al., “The joint gravity model 3,” Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 101, no. 12, pp. 28029–28049, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. F. G. Lemoine et al., “The development of the joint NASA GSFC and NIMA geopotential model EGM96,” Tech. Rep. NASA/TP-1998-206891, NASA/GSFC, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  14. P. R. Escobal, Methods of Orbit Determination, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1965.
  15. O. Montenbruck and E. Gill, Satellite Orbits: Models, Methods and Applications, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2005.