Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2009, Article ID 621625, 16 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2009/621625
Research Article

Warped Product Semi-Invariant Submanifolds in Almost Paracontact Riemannian Manifolds

Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Gaziosmanpaşa University, 60250 Tokat, Turkey

Received 2 December 2008; Revised 5 May 2009; Accepted 14 July 2009

Academic Editor: Fernando Lobo Pereira

Copyright © 2009 Mehmet Atçeken. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

We show that there exist no proper warped product semi-invariant submanifolds in almost paracontact Riemannian manifolds such that totally geodesic submanifold and totally umbilical submanifold of the warped product are invariant and anti-invariant, respectively. Therefore, we consider warped product semi-invariant submanifolds in the form by reversing two factor manifolds and . We prove several fundamental properties of warped product semi-invariant submanifolds in an almost paracontact Riemannian manifold and establish a general inequality for an arbitrary warped product semi-invariant submanifold. After then, we investigate warped product semi-invariant submanifolds in a general almost paracontact Riemannian manifold which satisfy the equality case of the inequality.

1. Introduction

It is well known that the notion of warped products plays some important role in differential geometry as well as physics. The geometry of warped product was introduced by Bishop and O'Neill [1]. Many geometers studied different objects/structures on manifolds endowed with an warped product metric (see [26]).

Recently, Chen has introduced the notion of CR-warped product in Kaehlerian manifolds and showed that there exist no proper warped product CR-submanifolds in the form in Kaehlerian manifolds. Therefore, he considered warped product CR-submanifolds in the form which is called CR-warped product, where is an invariant submanifold, and is an anti-invariant submanifold of Kaehlerian manifold (see [2, 7, 8]). Analogue results have been obtained for Sasakian ambient as the odd dimensional version of Kaehlerian manifold by Hasegawa and Mihai in [3] and Munteanu in [9].

Almost paracontact manifolds and almost paracontact Riemannian manifolds were defined and studied by at [10]. After then, many authors studied invariant and anti-invariant submanifolds of the almost paracontact Riemannian manifold with the structure , when is tangent to the submanifold, and is not tangent to the submanifold [11].

We note that CR-warped products in Kaehlerian manifold are corresponding warped product semi-invariant submanifolds in almost paracontact Riemannian manifolds. In this paper, we showed that there exist no warped product semi-invariant submanifolds in the form in contrast to Kaehlerian manifolds (see Theorem 3.1). So, from now on we consider warped product semi-invariant submanifolds in the form , where is an anti-invariant submanifold, and is an invariant submanifold of an almost paracontact Riemannian manifold by reversing the two factor manifolds and and it simply will be called warped product semi-invariant submanifold in the rest of this paper (see Example 3.3 and Theorem 3.4).

2. Preliminaries

Although there are many papers concerning the geometry of semi-invariant submanifolds of almost paracontact Riemannian manifolds (see [1113]), there is no paper concerning the geometry of warped product semi-invariant submanifolds of almost paracontact Riemannian manifolds in literature so far. So the purpose of the present paper is to study warped product semi-invariant submanifolds in almost paracontact Riemannian manifolds. We first review basic formulas and definitions for almost paracontact Riemannian manifolds and their submanifolds, which we shall use for later.

Let be an -dimensional differentiable manifold. If there exist on a type tensor field , a vector field and 1-form satisfying

then is said to be an almost paracontact manifold, where the symbol, denotes the tensor product. In the almost paracontact manifold, the following relations hold good:

An almost paracontactmanifold is said to be an almost paracontact metric manifold if Riemannian metric on satisfies

for all [14], where denotes the differentiable vector field set on . From (2.2) and (2.3), we can easily derive the relation

An almost paracontact metric manifold is said to be an almost paracontact Riemannian manifold with -connection if and , where denotes the connection on Since the vector field is also parallel with respect to [11, 13].

In the rest of this paper, let us suppose that is an almost paracontact Riemannian manifold with structure -connection.

Let be an almost paracontact Riemannian manifold, and let be a Riemannian manifold isometrically immersed in . For each , we denote by the maximal invariant subspace of the tangent space of . If the dimension of is the same for all in , then gives an invariant distribution on .

A submanifold in an almost paracontact Riemannian manifold is called semi-invariant submanifold if there exists on a differentiable invariant distribution whose orthogonal complementary is an anti-invariant distribution, that is, , where denotes the orthogonal vector bundle of in A semi-invariant submanifold is called anti-invariant (resp., invariant) submanifold if dim (resp., dim). It is called proper semi-invariant submanifold if it is neither invariant nor anti-invariant submanifold.

A semi-invariant submanifold of an almost paracontact Riemannian manifold is called a Riemannian product if the invariant distribution and anti-invariant distribution are totally geodesic distributions in . The geometry notion of the semi-invariant submanifolds has been studied by many geometers in the various type manifolds. Authors researched the fundamental properties of such submanifolds (see references).

Let and be two Riemannian manifolds with Riemannian metrics and , respectively, and a differentiable function on Consider the product manifold with its projection and . The warped product manifold is the manifold equipped with the Riemannian metric tensor such that

for any , where is the symbol for the tangent map. Thus we have , where is called the warping function of the warped product. The warped product manifold is characterized by the fact that and are totally geodesic and totally umbilical submanifolds of , respectively. Hence Riemannian products are special classes of the warped products [4].

In this paper, we define and study a new class of warped product semi-invariant submanifolds in an almost paracontact Riemannian manifolds, namely, we investigate the class of warped product semi-invariant submanifolds, and we establish the fundamental theory of such submanifolds.

Now, let be an isometrically immersed submanifold in an almost paracontact Riemannian manifold We denote by and the Levi-Civita connections on and respectively. Then the Gauss and Weingarten formulas are, respectively, defined by

for any , , where is the connection in the normal bundle is the second fundamental form of and is the shape operator. The second fundamental form and the shape operator are related by

Now, let be a differentiable manifold, and we suppose that is an isometrically immersed submanifold in almost paracontact Riemannian manifold . We denote by the metric tensor of as well as that induced on For any vector field tangent to , we put

where and denote the tangential and normal components of , respectively. For any vector field normal to , we also put

where and denote the tangential and normal components of , respectively. The submanifold is said to be invariant if is identically zero, that is, . On the other hand, is said to be anti-invariant submanifold if is identically zero, that is, .

We note that for any invariant submanifold of an almost paracontact Riemannian manifold , if is normal to , then the induced structure from the almost paracontact structure on is an almost product Riemannian structure whenever is nontrivial. If is tangent to then the induced structure on is an almost paracontact Riemannian structure.

Furthermore, we say that is a semi-invariant submanifold if there exist two orthogonal distributions and such that

(1) splits into the orthogonal direct sum ;(2)the distribution is invariant, that is, ;(3)the distribution is anti-invariant, that is,

Given any submanifold of an almost paracontact Riemannian manifold , from (2.4) and (2.8) we have

for any ,

From now on we suppose that the vector field is tangent to

We recall the following general lemma from [1] for later use.

Lemma 2.1. Let be a warped product manifold with warping function , then one has (1)(2)(3) where and denote the Levi-Civita connections on and , respectively.

Let be a semi-invariant submaniold of an almost paracontact Riemannian manifold . We denote by the invariant distribution and anti-invariant distribution . We also denote the orthogonal complementary of in by , then we have direct sum

We can easily see that is an invariant subbundle with respect to .

3. Warped Product Semi-Invariant Submanifolds in an Almost Paracontact Riemannian Manifold

Useful characterizations of warped product semi-invariant submanifolds in almost paracontact Riemannian manifolds are given the following theorems.

Theorem 3.1. If is a warped product semi-invariant submanifold of an almost paracontact Riemannian manifold such that is an invariant submanifold and is an anti-invariant submanifold of , then is a usual Riemannian product.

Proof. Let be normal to Taking into account that is symmetric and using (2.3), (2.6), (2.7), and considering Lemma 2.1, for and , we have which implies that .
If is tangent to , then can be written as follows: where and . Since , from the Gauss formulae, we have for any . Considering Lemma 2.1, we get for any and . If is identically zero, then from Lemma 2.1 we have It follows that the warping function is a constant and is usual Riemannian product. Hence the proof is complete.
If the warping function is constant, then the metric on the “second” factor could be modified by an homothety, and hence, the warped product becomes a direct product.

Now, we give two examples for almost paracontact Riemannian manifold and their submanifolds in the form to illustrate our results. Firstly, we construct an almost paracontact metric structure on (see Example 3.2) and after give an example which is concerning its submanifold (see Example 3.3).

Example 3.2. Let The almost paracontact Riemannian structure is defined on in the following way: If , then we have From this definition, it follows that for an arbitrary vector field . Thus becomes an almost paracontact Riemannian manifold, where and denote usual inner product and standard basis of , respectively.

Example 3.3. Let be a submanifold in with coordinates given by It is easy to check that the tangent bundle of is spanned by the vectors We define the almost paracontact Riemannian structure of by Then with respect to the almost paracontact Riemannian structure of , the space becomes Since and are orthogonal to and , are tangent to , and can be taken subspace and subspace , respectively, where can be taken as for and . Furthermore, the metric tensor of is given by Thus is a warped product semi-invariant submanifold with dimensional of almost paracontact manifold with warping function

Now, let be a warped product semi-invariant submanifold of an almost paracontact Riemannian manifold , where is an anti-invariant submanifold, and is an invariant submanifold of . If we denote the Levi-Civita connections on and by and , respectively, by using (2.6) and (2.8), we have

for any . Taking into account the tangential and normal components of (3.15), respectively, we have

where the derivatives of and are, respectively, defined by

Next, we are going to investigate the geometric properties of the leaves of the warped product semi-invariant submanifolds in an almost paracontact Riemannian manifold.

Theorem 3.4. Let be a warped product semi-invariant submanifold of an almost paracontact Riemannian manifold Then the invariant distribution and the anti invariant distribution are always integrable.

Proof. From (3.16) and considering lemma 2.1, we have for any and . From the tangential and normal components of (3.19), respectively, we arrive at By using (3.16) and (3.20) we get Furthermore, by using the Gauss-Weingarten formulas and taking into account that is totally geodesic in and it is anti-invariant in , by direct calculations, it is easily to see that which is also equivalent to for any . Moreover, using (2.4) and (2.7) and making use of being self-adjoint, we obtain which gives us for any and . Thus from (3.24) and (3.26), we arrive at for any . Furthermore, by using (2.6), (2.8), and (2.9) and considering Lemma 2.1, we have for any , where denote the Levi-Civita connection on Taking into account the normal and tangential components of (3.28), respectively, we have From (3.29), we can easily see that for any . Finally, by using (3.17) and (3.31), we have for any , that is, .
In the same way, making use of (3.16) and (3.27) for any , we conclude that that is, . So we obtain the desired result.

Since the distributions and are integrable, we denote the integral manifolds of and by and , respectively.

Now, the following theorem characterizes (warped product or Riemannian product) semi-invariant submanifolds in almost paracontact manifolds.

Theorem 3.5. Let be a submanifold of an almost paracontact Riemannian manifold . Then is a semi-invariant submanifold if and only .

Proof. Let us assume that is a semi-invariant submanifold of an almost paracontact Riemannian manifold and by and we denote the projection operators on subspaces and , respectively, then we have Moreover, by using (2.1), (2.8), and (2.9), if is tangent to , then we get for any and . On the other hand, if is normal to , then (3.35) and (3.36) become, respectively, From (2.8), we have for any . From the tangential and normal components, we have Since is invariant and is anti-invariant, we get We have by virtue of . Now by using the right-hand side to the second equation of (3.35) and using (3.40) and (3.41), we conclude that which is also equivalent to
Conversely, for a submanifold of an almost paracontact Riemannian manifold , we suppose that . For any vector fields tangent to and normal to , by using (2.4) and (3.43), we have for all . So we have . Since , it implies which is also equivalent to from (3.36). Since , we get . So, from (3.35) and (3.36), we conclude Now, if we put then we can derive that which show that and are orthogonal complementary projection operators and define complementary distributions and , respectively, where and denote the distributions which are belong to subspaces and , respectively. From (3.42), (3.45), and (3.46) we can derive These equations show that the distribution is an invariant and the distribution is an anti-invariant. The proof is complete.

Theorem 3.6. Let be a semi-invariant submanifold of an almost paracontact Riemannian manifold . Then is a warped product semi-invariant submanifold if and only if the shape operator of satisfies for some function on satisfying , .

Proof. We suppose that is a warped product semi-invariant submanifold in an almost paracontact Riemannian manifold . Then from (3.22), we have for any and . Since is the only function on , we can easily see that for all .
Conversely, let us assume that is a semi-invariant submanifold in an almost paracontact Riemannian manifold satisfying for some function on satisying for all . Since the ambient space is an almost paracontact Riemannian manifold and making use of (2.4) and (3.27), we arrive at for any and . Thus the anti-invariant distribution is totally geodesic in . In the same way, making use of being Levi-Civita connection and (3.22), we have for any and , where . Since the invariant distribution of semi-invariant submanifold is always integrable (Theorem 3.4) and , for each , which implies that the integral manifold of is an extrinsic sphere in , that is, it is a totally umbilical submanifold and its mean curvature vector field is non-zero and parallel, thus we know that is a Riemannian warped product , where and denote the integral manifolds of the distributions of and , respectively, and is the warping function. So we obtain the desired result.

In the rest of this section, we are going to obtain an inequality for the squared norm of the second fundamental form by means of the warping function for warped product semi-invariant submanifolds of an almost paracontact Riemannian manifold. Now, we recall that semi-invariant is said to be mixed geodesic (resp., -geodesic and -geodesic) submanifold if the second fundamental form of satisfies , and (resp., , and , ).

Now, we are going to give the following lemma for later use.

Lemma 3.7. Let be a warped product semi-invariant submanifold of an almost paracontact Riemannian manifold . Then one has(1)(2), , (3), for any and (4) if and only if is a usual Riemannian product, where and denote the leaves of and , respectively.

Proof. For any , by using (2.4) and (3.27) and considering that the ambient space is an almost paracontact Riemannian manifold, we have
Making use of being Levi-Civita connection and Lemma 2.1(2.2), we get for any , . 
In the same way, we have for any and .
Considering Lemma 2.1 we derive for any and .

Theorem 3.8. Let be a warped product semi-invariant submanifold of an almost paracontact Riemannian manifold Then one has the following.(1) The squared norm of the second fundamental form of in satisfies where denote the trace of mapping .(2) If the equality sign of (3.57) holds identically, then is a totally geodesic, is a totally umbilical submanifolds of and is a mixed geodesic submanifold in Furthermore, is a minimal submanifold if and only if or is a usual Riemannian product.

Proof. Let be an orthonormal basis of an almost paracontact Riemannian manifold such that is tangent to is tangent to and is tangent to . Taking into account Lemma 3.7 and the basic linear algebra rules, by direct calculations, we have for all and . Since here by direct calculations, we get So we conclude that which proves our assertion.
Now we assume that the equality case of (3.57) holds identically, then from (3.58), respectively, we obtain Since is totally geodesic submanifold in , the first condition in (3.62) implies that is totally geodesic submanifold in . Moreover, Lemma 2.1 shows that is totally umbilical submanifold in . Therefore, the second condition in (3.62) implies that is also totally umbilical submanifold in . On the other hand, (3.20) and (3.63) imply that is mixed geodesic submanifold in

Conclusion 3.9. The geometry of the warped products in Riemannian manifolds is totally different from the geometry of the warped products in complex manifolds. Namely, in the complex manifolds, there exists no proper warped product CR-submanifold in the form (see [2, 8]) while there exists no proper warped product semi-invariant submanifold in the form in Riemannian manifolds (see Theorem 3.1). The first condition in (3.62) implies that warped product CR-submanifold is minimal in complex manifolds while it does not imply that warped product semi-invariant submanifold is minimal in Riemannian product manifolds.

Acknowledgment

The author would like to thank the referees for valuable suggestions and comments, which have improved the present paper.

References

  1. R. L. Bishop and B. O'Neill, “Manifolds of negative curvature,” Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 145, pp. 1–49, 1969. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  2. B.-Y. Chen, “Geometry of warped product CR-submanifolds in Kaehler manifolds,” Monatshefte für Mathematik, vol. 133, no. 3, pp. 177–195, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  3. I. Hasegawa and I. Mihai, “Contact CR-warped product submanifolds in Sasakian manifolds,” Geometriae Dedicata, vol. 102, pp. 143–150, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  4. V. A. Khan, K. A. Khan, and Sirajuddin, “Contact CR-warped product submanifolds of Kenmotsu manifolds,” Thai Journal of Mathematics, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 138–145, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  5. K. Matsumoto and I. Mihai, “Warped product submanifolds in Sasakian space forms,” SUT Journal of Mathematics, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 135–144, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  6. D. Won Yoon, K. Soo Cho, and S. Gook Han, “Some inequalities for warped products in locally conformal almost cosymplectic manifolds,” Note di Matematica, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 51–60, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  7. B.-Y. Chen, “CR-warped products in complex projective spaces with compact holomorphic factor,” Monatshefte für Mathematik, vol. 141, no. 3, pp. 177–186, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  8. B.-Y. Chen, “Geometry of warped product CR-submanifolds in Kaehler manifolds. II,” Monatshefte für Mathematik, vol. 134, no. 2, pp. 103–119, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  9. M. I. Munteanu, “Warped product contact CR-submanifolds of Sasakian space forms,” Publicationes Mathematicae Debrecen, vol. 66, no. 1-2, pp. 75–120, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  10. I. Satō, “On a structure similar to the almost contact structure,” The Tensor Society. Tensor. New Series, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 219–224, 1976. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  11. S. Ianus, K. Matsumoto, and I. Mihai, “Almost semi-invariant submanifolds of some almost paracontact Riemannian manifolds,” Bulletin of Yamagata University, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 121–128, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  12. A. Bejancu, “Semi-invariant submanifolds of locally product Riemannian manifolds,” Analele, Universitatii Din Timisoara, Seria Matematica-Informatica, vol. 22, no. 1-2, pp. 3–11, 1984. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  13. S. Ianus and I. Mihai, “Semi-invariant submanifolds of an almost paracontact manifold,” The Tensor Society. Tensor, vol. 39, pp. 195–200, 1982. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  14. N. Jovanka, “Conditions for invariant submanifold of a manifold with the (φ,ξ,η,G)-structure,” Kragujevac Journal of Mathematics, vol. 25, pp. 147–154, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet