Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2010, Article ID 819064, 15 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/819064
Research Article

Matrix Bounds for the Solution of the Continuous Algebraic Riccati Equation

Department of Mathematics and Computational Science, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan, Hunan 411105, China

Received 19 December 2009; Revised 22 June 2010; Accepted 16 August 2010

Academic Editor: John Burns

Copyright © 2010 Juan Zhang and Jianzhou Liu. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. D. L. Kleinman and M. Athans, “The design of suboptimal linear time-varying systems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 13, pp. 150–159, 1968. View at Google Scholar
  2. H. Kwakernaak and R. Sivan, Linear Optimal Control Systems, Wiley-Interscience, New York, NY, USA, 1972.
  3. K. Ogata, Modern Control Engineering, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 3rd edition, 1997.
  4. R. Davies, P. Shi, and R. Wiltshire, “New upper solution bounds for perturbed continuous algebraic Riccati equations applied to automatic control,” Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 487–495, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  5. M.-L. Ni, “Existence condition on solutions to the algebraic Riccati equation,” Acta Automatica Sinica, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 85–87, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. S. D. Wang, T.-S. Kuo, and C. F. Hsü, “Trace bounds on the solution of the algebraic matrix Riccati and Lyapunov equation,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 654–656, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  7. V. I. Hasanov and S. M. El-Sayed, “On the positive definite solutions of nonlinear matrix equation X+A*XδA=Q,” Linear Algebra and Its Applications, vol. 412, no. 2-3, pp. 154–160, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  8. Z. Peng, S. M. El-Sayed, and X. Zhang, “Iterative methods for the extremal positive definite solution of the matrix equation X+A*XαA=Q,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 200, no. 2, pp. 520–527, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  9. S. Barnett and C. Storey, Matrix Methods in Stability Theory, Barnes and Noble Inc., New York, NY, USA, 1970.
  10. R. V. Patel and M. Toda, “Bounds on performance of nonstationary continuous-time filters under modelling uncertainty,” Automatica, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 117–120, 1984. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. T. Mori and I. A. Derese, “A brief summary of the bounds on the solution of the algebraic matrix equations in control theory,” International Journal of Control, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 247–256, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. W. H. Kwon, Y. S. Moon, and S. C. Ahn, “Bounds in algebraic Riccati and Lyapunov equations: a survey and some new results,” International Journal of Control, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 377–389, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  13. W. H. Kwon and A. E. Pearson, “A note on the algebraic matrix Riccati equation,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 143–144, 1977. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  14. R. V. Patel and M. Toda, “On norm bounds for algebraic Riccati and Lyapunov equations,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 87–88, 1978. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  15. K. Yasuda and K. Hirai, “Upper and lower bounds on the solution of the algebraic Riccati equation,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 483–487, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  16. V. R. Karanam, “A note on eigenvalue bounds in algebraic Riccati equation,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 109–111, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  17. B.-H. Kwon, M.-J. Youn, and Z. Bien, “On bounds of the Riccati and Lyapunov matrix equations,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 30, no. 11, pp. 1134–1135, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  18. J. M. Saniuk and Ian B. Rhodes, “A matrix inequality associated with bounds on solutions of algebraic Riccati and Lyapunov equations,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 739–740, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. C.-H. Lee, “On the upper and lower bounds of the solution for the continuous Riccati matrix equation,” International Journal of Control, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 105–118, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  20. H. H. Choi and T.-Y. Kuc, “Lower matrix bounds for the continuous Riccati algebraic and Lyapunov matrix equations,” Automatica, vol. 17, pp. 147–148, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  21. C.-Y. Chen and C. H. Lee, “Explicit matrix bounds of the solution for the continuous Riccati equation,” ICIC Express Letters, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 147–152, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  22. D. S. Bernstein, Matrix Mathematics, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 2005.
  23. A. W. Marshall and I. Olkin, Inequalities: Theory of Majorization and Its Applications, vol. 143 of Mathematics in Science and Engineering, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1979.
  24. A. W. Marshall, The Schur Complement and Its Applications, vol. 4 of Numerical Methods and Algorithms, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. K. Fan, “Maximum properties and inequalities for the eigenvalues of completely continuous operators,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 37, pp. 760–766, 1951. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  26. E. Kreindler and A. Jameson, “Conditions for nonnegativeness of partitioned matrices,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 17, pp. 147–148, 1972. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH