Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2011, Article ID 162580, 14 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/162580
Research Article

The Application of Memetic Algorithms for Forearm Crutch Design: A Case Study

1Industrial Engineering Program, School of Computing, Informatics, Decision Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA
2Center for Rapid Product Development, Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Dayton, OH 45433-7765, USA
3Department of Systems and Engineering Management, Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Dayton, OH 45433-7765, USA

Received 31 July 2010; Revised 16 December 2010; Accepted 5 January 2011

Academic Editor: Reza Jazar

Copyright © 2011 Teresa Wu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. N. Alexandrov, “Editorial—multidisciplinary design optimization,” Optimization and Engineering, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 5–7, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. R. D. Braun and I. M. Kroo, “Development and application of the collaborative optimization architecture in a multidisciplinary design environment,” in Multidisciplinary Design Optimization: State of the Art, pp. 98–116, SIAM, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  3. A. Badiru and V. Theodoracatos, “Analytical and integrative expert system model for design project management,” Journal of Design and Manufacturing, vol. 4, pp. 195–213, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  4. A. E. Thal, A. Badiru, and R. Sawhney, “Distributed project management for new product development,” International Journal of Electronic Business Management, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 93–104, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  5. J. Sobieszczanski-Sobieski and R. T. Haftka, “Multidisciplinary aerospace design optimization: survey of recent developments,” Structural Optimization, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–23, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  6. N. M. Alexandrov and R. M. Lewis, “An analysis of some bilevel approaches to multidisciplinary design optimization,” Tech. Rep., Institute for Computer Applications in Science and Engineering, NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, Va, USA, June 2000. View at Google Scholar
  7. C. C. Huang, “A multi-agent approach to collaborative design of modular products,” Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 39–47, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  8. W. D. Li, S. K. Ong, J. Y. H. Fuh, Y. S. Wong, Y. Q. Lu, and A. Y. C. Nee, “Feature-based design in a distributed and collaborative environment,” CAD Computer Aided Design, vol. 36, no. 9, pp. 775–797, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. T. W. Simpson, C. C. Seepersad, and F. Mistree, “Balancing commonality and performance within the concurrent design of multiple products in a product family,” Concurrent Engineering Research and Applications, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 177–190, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  10. G. Hernandez, C. C. Seepersad, and F. Mistree, “Designing for maintenance: a game theoretic approach,” Engineering Optimization, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 561–577, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. H.-J. Choi, J. H. Panchal, J. K. Allen, D. Rosen, and F. Mistree, “Towards a standardized engineering framework for distributed, collaborative product realization,” in Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, vol. 1, pp. 985–995, Chicago, Ill, USA, 2003.
  12. H. J. Wassenaar and W. Chen, “An approach to decision-based design with discrete choice analysis for demand modeling,” Journal of Mechanical Design, vol. 125, no. 3, pp. 490–497, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. H. J. Wassenaar, W. Chen, J. Cheng, and A. Sudjianto, “Enhancing discrete choice demand modeling for decision-based design,” Journal of Mechanical Design, vol. 127, no. 4, pp. 514–523, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. E. Nikolaidis, “Decision-based approach for reliability design,” Journal of Mechanical Design, vol. 129, no. 5, pp. 466–475, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. H. Simon, “A behavioral model of rational choice,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 6, pp. 99–118, 1955. View at Google Scholar
  16. K. Lewis and F. Mistree, “Collaborative, sequential, and isolated decisions in design,” Journal of Mechanical Design, vol. 120, no. 4, pp. 643–652, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  17. K. Lewis and F. Mistree, “Foraging-directed Adaptive Linear Programming (FALP): a hybrid algorithm for discrete/continuous design problems,” Engineering Optimization, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 191–217, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  18. M. G. Fernandez, J. H. Panchal, J. K. Allen, and F. Mistree, “An interactions protocol for collaborative decision making—concise interactions and effective management of shared design spaces,” in Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computer and Information in Engineering Conference, Long Beach, Calif, USA, 2005, Paper No. DETC2005-85381.
  19. S. Boyd, “EE392o Course Notes: Sub-Gradient Methods,” Stanford University, Stanford, Calif, USA, 2004, http://www.stanford.edu/class/ee392o/.
  20. J. Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, “A linear decomposition method for large optimization problems blueprint for development,” National Aeronautics and Space Administration, NASA/TM-83248-1982, 1982.
  21. J. Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, “Optimization by decomposition: a step from hierarchic to nonhierarchic systems,” Tech. Rep. TM 101494, NASA, Hampton, Va, USA, September 1988. View at Google Scholar
  22. J. Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, B. B. James, and A. R. Dovi, “Structural optimization by multilevel decomposition,” AIAA journal, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 1775–1782, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  23. R. Balling and J. Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, “Optimization of coupled systems: a critical overview,” in Proceedings of the 5th AIAA/NASA/USAF/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Panama City Beach, Fla, USA, September 1994.
  24. J. Sobieszczanski-Sobieski and S. Kodiyalam, “BLISS/S: a new method for two-level structural optimization,” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. G. M. Fernandez, W. D. Rosen, K. J. Allen, and F. Mistree, “A decision support framework for distributed collaborative design and manufacture,” in Proceedings of the 9th AIAA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Atlanta, Ga, USA, Sepember 2002.
  26. D. Kumar, C. Hoyle, W. Chen, N. Wang, G. Gomez-levi, and F. Koppelman, “Incorporating customer preferences and market trends in vehicle packaging design,” in Proceedings of the DETC, International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (ASME '07), Las Vegas, NV, USA, Sepember 2007.
  27. B. Besharati, L. Luo, S. Azarm, and P. K. Kannan, “Multi-objective single product robust optimization: an integrated design and marketing approach,” Journal of Mechanical Design, vol. 128, no. 4, pp. 884–892, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. C. -S. Shiau and J. Michalek, “A game-theoretic approach to finding market equilibria for automotive design under environmental regulation,” in Proceedings of the ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences, vol. 6, pp. 187–195, Las Vegas, Nev, USA, September 2008.
  29. D. B. Sieger, A. B. Badiru, and M. Milatovic, “A metric for agility measurement in product development,” IIE Transactions, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 637–645, 2000. View at Google Scholar