Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 325610, 27 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/325610
Research Article

Strategic and Tactical Design of Competing Decentralized Supply Chain Networks with Risk-Averse Participants for Markets with Uncertain Demand

Department of Industrial Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, 16846113114 Tehran, Iran

Received 23 April 2011; Revised 18 July 2011; Accepted 11 August 2011

Academic Editor: Alexander Pogromsky

Copyright © 2011 Ashkan Hafezalkotob et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. K. Kogan and C. S. Tapiero, Supply Chain Games: Operations Management and Risk Valuation, International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, 113, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  2. C. Chandra and J. Grabis, Supply Chain Configuration: Concepts, Solutions and Applications, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2007.
  3. T. Xiao and D. Yang, “Price and service competition of supply chains with risk-averse retailers under demand uncertainty,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 114, no. 1, pp. 187–200, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. S. Rezapour and R. Z. Farahani, “Strategic design of competing centralized supply chain networks for markets with deterministic demands,” Advances in Engineering Software, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 810–822, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. T. Boyaci and G. Gallego, “Supply chain coordination in a market with customer service competition,” Production and Operations Management, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 3–22, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. Jain, “Value of capacity pooling in supply chains with heterogeneous customers,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 177, no. 1, pp. 239–260, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. D. Zhang, “A network economic model for supply chain versus supply chain competition,” Omega, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 283–295, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. S. Chopra and P. Meindl, Supply Chain Management, Strategy, Planning, and Operation, Prince Hall, Long Branch, NJ, USA, 2007.
  9. D. Simchi-Levi and P. Kaminsky, Designing and Managing the Supply Chain, McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York, NY, USA, 2003.
  10. E. N. Barron, Game Theory: An Introduction, Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2008. View at Zentralblatt MATH
  11. A. A. Tsay, “Risk sensitivity in distribution channel partnerships: implications for manufacturer return policies,” Journal of Retailing, vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 147–160, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. D. Selz and S. Klein, “Emerging electronic intermediaries—the case of the automotive industry,” in Proceedings of 10th Bled EC Conference, pp. 316–336, Bled, Slovenia, 1997.
  13. A. A. Tsay and N. Agrawal, “Modeling conflict and coordination in multi-channel distribution systems: a review,” in Supply Chain Management in the E-Business Era, D. Simchi-Levi, D. Wu, and M. Shen, Eds., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Mass, USA, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  14. C. A. Ingene and M. E. Parry, “Coordination and manufacturer profit maximization: the multiple retailer channel,” Journal of Retailing, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 129–151, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. S. Netessine and N. Rudi, “Supply chain structures on the internet: marketing-operations coordination under drop-shipping,” Tech. Rep., The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  16. J. C. Fransoo, M. J. F. Wouters, and T. G. de Kok, “Multi-echelon multi-company inventory planning with limited information exchange,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 52, no. 7, pp. 830–838, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. F. Chen, A. Federgruen, and Y. S. Zheng, “Coordination mechanisms for a distribution system with one supplier and multiple retailers,” Management Science, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 693–708, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. Q. Meng, Y. Huang, and R. L. Cheu, “Competitive facility location on decentralized supply chains,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 196, no. 2, pp. 487–499, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. H. Kurata, D. Q. Yao, and J. J. Liu, “Pricing policies under direct vs. indirect channel competition and national vs. store brand competition,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 180, no. 1, pp. 262–281, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. P. L. Abad, “Supplier pricing and lot sizing when demand is price sensitive,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 78, no. 3, pp. 334–354, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. W. J. Lee, “Determining order quantity and selling price by geometric programming,” Decision Sciences, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 76–87, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  22. W. J. Lee and D. Kim, “Optimal and heuristic decision strategies for integrated product and marketing planning,” Decision Sciences, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 1203–1213, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  23. H. Jung and C. M. Klein, “Optimal inventory policies under decreasing cost functions via geometric programming,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 132, no. 3, pp. 628–642, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. H. Jung and C. M. Klein, “Optimal inventory policies for an economic order quantity model with decreasing cost functions,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 165, no. 1, pp. 108–126, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  25. J. R. Freeland, “Coordination strategies for production and marketing in a functionally decentralized firm,” AIIE Transactions, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 126–132, 1980. View at Google Scholar
  26. S. J. Sadjadi, M. Oroujee, and M. B. Aryanezhad, “Optimal production and marketing planning,” Computational Optimization and Applications, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 195–203, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  27. M. Esmaeili and P. Zeephongsekul, “Seller-buyer models of supply chain management with an asymmetric information structure,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 123, no. 1, pp. 146–154, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. M. Esmaeili, M. B. Aryanezhad, and P. Zeephongsekul, “A game theory approach in seller-buyer supply chain,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 195, no. 2, pp. 442–448, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. P. Koltler and K. L. Keller, Marketing Management, Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2006.
  30. F. Gasmi, J. J. Laffont, and Q. Vuong, “Econometric analysis of collusive behavior in soft-drink market,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 277–311, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  31. V. Kadiyali, “Entry, its deterrence, and its accommodation: a study of the U.S. photographic film industry,” RAND Journal of Economics, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 452–478, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. W. P. Putsis and R. Dhar, “Category expenditure, promotion and competitive market interactions: can promotions really expand the pie?” Tech. Rep., London Business School/Yale School of Management, London, UK, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  33. P. S. H. Leeflang, “Modeling competitive responsiveness,” in Handbook of Marketing Decision Models, B. Wierenga, Ed., Springer Science, New York, NY, USA, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  34. T. Xiao and D. Yang, “Risk sharing and information revelation mechanism of a one-manufacturer and one-retailer supply chain facing an integrated competitor,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 196, no. 3, pp. 1076–1085, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  35. A. A. Tsay and N. Agrawal, “Channel dynamics under price and service competition,” Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 372–391, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. F. Bernstein and A. Federgruen, “Coordination mechanisms for supply chains under price and service competition,” Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 242–262, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. G. Allon and A. Federgruen, “Competition in service industries,” Operations Research, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 37–55, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  38. D. Yang, T. Xiao, and H. Shen, “Pricing, service level and lot size decisions of a supply chain with risk-averse retailers: implications to practitioners,” Production Planning and Control, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 320–331, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. S. A. Mirhassani, C. Lucas, G. Mitra, E. Messina, and C. A. Poojari, “Computational solution of capacity planning models under uncertainty,” Parallel Computing, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 511–538, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. P. Tsiakis, N. Shah, and C. C. Pantelides, “Design of multi-echelon supply chain networks under demand uncertainty,” Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 40, no. 16, pp. 3585–3604, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. T. Santoso, S. Ahmed, M. Goetschalckx, and A. Shapiro, “A stochastic programming approach for supply chain network design under uncertainty,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 167, no. 1, pp. 96–115, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  42. A. Nagurney, J. Dong, and D. Zhang, “A supply chain network equilibrium model,” Transportation Research Part E, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 281–303, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. J. Dong, D. Zhang, and A. Nagurney, “A supply chain network equilibrium model with random demands,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 156, no. 1, pp. 194–212, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  44. A. Nagurney and F. Toyasaki, “Reverse supply chain management and electronic waste recycling: a multitiered network equilibrium framework for e-cycling,” Transportation Research Part E, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 1–28, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. A. Nagurney, J. Cruz, J. Dong, and D. Zhang, “Supply chain networks, electronic commerce, and supply side and demand side risk,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 164, no. 1, pp. 120–142, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. R. C. Savaskan, S. Bhattacharya, and L. N. Van Wassenhove, “Closed-loop supply chain models with product remanufacturing,” Management Science, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 239–252, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. W. E. Walsh and M. P. Wellman, “Decentralized supply chain formation: a market protocol and competitive equilibrium analysis,” Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, vol. 19, pp. 513–567, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. H. Wang, M. Guo, and J. Efstathiou, “A game-theoretical cooperative mechanism design for a two-echelon decentralized supply chain,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 157, no. 2, pp. 372–388, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  49. M. T. Melo, S. Nickel, and F. Saldanha-da-Gama, “Facility location and supply chain management—a review,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 196, no. 2, pp. 401–412, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  50. E. P. Robinson and M. Swink, “Reason based solutions and the complexity of distribution network design problems,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 393–409, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. E. P. Robinson and M. L. Swink, “A comparative model of facility network design methodologies,” Journal of Operations Management, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 169–181, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. I. S. Bakal, J. Geunes, and H. E. Romeijn, “Market selection decisions for inventory models with price-sensitive demand,” Journal of Global Optimization, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 633–657, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  53. L. Schoonbeek and P. Kooreman, “The impact of advertising in a duopoly game,” International Game Theory Review, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 565–581, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  54. S. M. Gilbert and V. Cvsa, “Strategic commitment to price to stimulate downstream innovation in a supply chain,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 150, no. 3, pp. 617–639, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. Z. Bar-Shira and I. Finkelshtain, “Two-moments decision models and utility-representable preferences,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 237–244, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. V. Agrawal and S. Seshadri, “Risk intermediation in supply chains,” IIE Transactions, vol. 32, no. 9, pp. 819–831, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. X. Gan, S. P. Sethi, and H. Yan, “Channel coordination with a risk-neutral supplier and a downside-risk-averse retailer,” Production and Operations Management, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 80–89, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus