Trigonometric Function Periodic Wave Solutions and Their Limit Forms for the KdV-Like and the PC-Like Equations
Liu Zhengrong,1Jiang Tianpei,1Qin Peng,1and Xu Qinfeng1
Academic Editor: Ming Li
Received15 Feb 2011
Accepted26 May 2011
Published17 Aug 2011
Abstract
We use the bifurcation method of dynamical systems to
study the periodic wave solutions and their limit forms for the KdV-like equation , and PC-like equation , respectively. Via some special phase orbits, we obtain some new explicit periodic wave solutions which are called trigonometric function periodic wave solutions because they are expressed in terms of trigonometric functions. We also show that the trigonometric function periodic wave solutions can be obtained from the limits of elliptic function periodic wave solutions. It is very interesting that the two equations have similar periodic wave solutions. Our work extend previous some results.
1. Introduction
Many authors have investigated the KdV-like equation
and the PC-like equation
For example, Dey [1, 2] studied the exact Himiltonian density and the conservation laws, and gave two kink solutions for (1.1). Zhang et al. [3, 4] gave some solitary wave solutions and singular wave solutions for (1.1) by using two different methods. Yu [5] got an exact kink soliton for (1.1) by using homogeneous balance method. Grimshaw et al. [6] studied the large-amplitude solitons for (1.1). Fan [7, 8] gave some bell-shaped soliton solutions, kink-shaped soliton, and Jacobi periodic solutions for (1.1) by using algebraic method. Tang et al. [9] investigated solitary waves and their bifurcations for (1.1) by employing bifurcation method of dynamical systems. Peng [10] used the modified mapping method to get some solitary wave solutions composed of hyperbolic functions, periodic wave solutions composed of Jacobi elliptic functions, and singular wave solution composed of triangle functions for (1.1). Chow et al. [11] described the interaction between a soliton and a breather for (1.1) by using the Hirota bilinear method. Kaya and Inan [12] studied solitary wave solutions for (1.1) by using Adomian decomposition method. Yomba [13] used Fan's subequation method to construct exact traveling wave solutions composed of hyperbolic functions or Jacobi elliptic functions for (1.1).
Zhang and Ma [14] gave some explicit solitary wave solutions composed of hyperbolic functions by using solving algebraic equations for (1.2). Li and Zhang [15] used bifurcation method of dynamical system to study the bifurcation of traveling wave solutions and construct solitary wave solutions for (1.2). Kaya [16] discussed the exact and numerical solitary wave solutions by using a decomposition method for (1.2). Rafei et al. [17] gave numerical solutions by using He's method for (1.2).
Recently, many authors have presented some useful methods to deal with the problems in equations, for instance [18β30].
In this paper, we use the bifurcation method mentioned above to study the periodic wave solutions for (1.1) and (1.2). Through some special phase orbits, we obtain new expressions of periodic wave solutions which are composed of trigonometric functions sinβ or cosβ. These solutions are called trigonometric function periodic wave solutions. We also check the correctness by using the software Mathematica.
In Section 2, we will state our results for (1.1). In Section 3, we will state our results for (1.2). In Sections 4, and 5, we will give derivations for our main results. Some discussions and the orders for testing the correctness of the solutions will be given in Section 6.
2. Trigonometric Function Periodic Wave Solutions for (1.1)
In this section, we state our main results for (1.1). In order to state these results conveniently, we give some preparations. For given constant , on plane we define some lines and regions as follows.()When , we define lines
and regions , as Figure 1(a).
(a)
(b)
()When , we define lines
and regions , as Figure 1(b).
Using the lines and regions in Figure 1, we narrate our results as follows.
Proposition 2.1. For arbitrary given constant , let
Then, (1.1) has the following periodic wave solutions. (1)When and or , the expression of the periodic wave solution is
which has the following limit forms.()When , and tends to the line , tends to the periodic blow-up solution
(see Figure 2).()When , and tends to the line , tends to the periodic blow-up solution
(see Figure 3).()When , or , and tends to , tends to the trivial solution .()When and , or when and , the expression of the periodic wave solution is
where
The solution has the following limit forms. ()When , and tends to , the tends to the peak-shaped solitary wave solution
(see Figure 4).()When , and tends to , tends to the trivial solution .()When , and tends to , the tends to the periodic blow-up solution
(see Figure 5).()When and , or when and , the expressions of the solution is
where
The solution has the following limit forms.()When , and tends to , the tends to the canyon-shaped solitary wave (see Figure 6) solution . ()When , and tends to , tends to the trivial solution . ()When , and tends to , the tends to the periodic blow-up wave solution (see Figure 3).
(a) for
(b) for
(c) for
(a) for
(b) for
(c) for
(a) for
(b) for
(c) for
(a) for
(b) for
(c) for
(a) for
(b) for
(c) for
Remark 2.2. Note that if is a solution of (1.1), then also is solution of (1.1), where is a arbitrary constant. According to this fact and the results listed in Proposition 2.1, the following nine functions also are periodic wave solutions of (1.1). (1) When and or , the functions are
(2) When and or when and , the functions are
(3) When and , or when and , the functions are
Remark 2.3. In the given parametric regions, the solutions , , , , and are nonsingular. The solutions , , and are singular. The relationships of singular solutions and nonsingular solutions are displayed in the Proposition 2.1.
3. Trigonometric Function Periodic Wave Solutions for (1.2)
In this section, we state our main results for (1.2). For given and , on plane we define some rays and regions as follows.()When , we define curves
and region as the domain surrounded by and , as the domain surrounded by and (see Figure 7(a)).
(a)
(b)
()When , we define curves
and region as the domain surrounded by and , as the domain surrounded by and (see Figure 7(b)).
Using the rays and regions above, we state our results as follows.
Proposition 3.1. For given parameter and constant satisfying , let . Then, (1.2) has the following periodic wave solutions. ()When and or , the expression of the periodic wave solution is
where
For , the periodic wave solution has the following limit forms.()When , and tends to the ray , tends to the periodic blow-up solution
The limiting process is similar to that in Figure 2.()When , and tends to the ray , tends to the periodic blow-up solution
The limiting process is similar to that in Figure 3.()When , and tends to the curve , or and tends to the curve , tends to the trivial solution .(2)When and , or when and , the expression of the periodic wave solution is
where
The periodic wave solution has the following limit forms. ()When , , and tends to the curve , tends to the trivial solution .()When , , and tends to the curve , the tends to the canyon-shaped solitary wave solution
The limiting process is similar to that in Figure 6.()When , , and tends to the ray , tends to the periodic blow-up wave solution
The limiting process is similar to that in Figure 2.(3)When and , or when and , the expression of the periodic wave solution is
where
The periodic wave solution has the following limit forms:()When , , and tends to the curve , tends to the trivial solution .()When , , and tends to the curve , the tends to the peak-shaped solitary wave solution . The limiting process is similar to that in Figure 4.()When , , and tends to the ray , the tends to the periodic blow-up wave solution . The limiting process is similar to that in Figure 5.
Remark 3.2. Similar to the reason in Remark 2.2, the following nine functions also are periodic wave solutions of (1.2). ()When and or , the functions are ()
When and or when and , the functions are ()
When and or when and , the functions are
Remark 3.3. In the given regions, the solutions , , , , and are nonsingular. The solutions , , and are singular. The relationships of nonsingular solutions and singular solutions are displayed in Proposition 3.1.
Let
where is defined in (2.8). Then, it is easy to see that system (4.3) has three singular points , and when , two singular points and when , unique singular point when .
Let and be, respectively,
Using the qualitative analysis of dynamical systems, we obtain the bifurcation phase portraits of system (4.3) and the locations of and as Figures 8 and 9.
It is easy to test that the closed orbit passing passes . Thus, using the phase portraits in Figures 8 and 9, we derive as follows.
()When and or , the closed orbit passing the points and has expression
Substituting (4.7) into , we have
Integrating (4.8) along the closed orbit and noting that , we obtain the solution as (2.4).() When and or when and , the closed orbit passing the points and has expression
Substituting (4.9) into , we get
Along the closed orbit integrating (4.10) and noting that , we get the solution as (2.7).() When and or when and , the closed orbit passing the points and has expression
Substituting (4.11) into , it follows that
Similarly, along the closed orbit integrating (4.12), we obtain as (2.16). From the expressions of these solutions, we get their limit forms. This completes the derivation on Proposition 2.1.
In this section, we give derivation on Proposition 3.1. Let with , where is a constant. Thus, (1.2) becomes
Integrating (5.1) twice and letting integral constant be zero, we get
Letting , we have the planar system
It is easy to see that system (5.3) has the first integral
and three singular points , , and , where
and is defined in (3.9).
Let and be, respectively,
Similarly, using the qualitative analysis of dynamical systems, we get the bifurcation phase portraits of system (5.3) and the locations of and as Figures 10 and 11.
It is easy to test that the closed orbit passing passes . Thus, using the phase portraits in Figures 10 and 11, we derive as follows.()When and or , the closed orbit passing the points and has expression
Substituting (5.7) into , we have
Integrating (5.8) along the closed orbit and noting that , we get the solution as (3.3). () When and , or when and , the closed orbit passing the points and has expression
From and (5.9), it follows that
Integrating (5.10) along the closed orbit, we get as (3.7).() When and , or when and , the closed orbit passing the points and has expression
Substituting (5.11) into , we have
Integrating (5.12) along the closed orbit, we obtain as (3.12). From the expressions of these solutions, we get their limiting properties. This completes the derivation on Proposition 3.1.
6. Discussions and Testing Orders
In this paper, Using the special closed orbits, we have obtained trigonometric function periodic wave solutions for (1.1) and (1.2), respectively. Their limit forms have been given. From these expressions, an interesting phenomena has been seen, that is, (1.1) and (1.2) have similar periodic wave solutions. Our work has extended previous results on periodic wave solutions.
Now, we point out that the trigonometric function periodic wave solutions can be obtained from the limits of the elliplic function periodic wave solution. For given real number , let
where
Assume that , , and . It is easy to check that are real and satisfy
There are two closed orbits and (see Figure 12). The closed orbit passes the points and . The closed orbit passes the points and .
On plane, the expression of is
Substituting (6.4) into and integrating it along , we have
where
Solving (6.5) for and noting that , we obtain an elliptic function periodic wave solution
where
Letting , it follows that , , , , and .
Therefore, in (6.7) letting , we obtain the trigonometric function periodic wave solution
Via Remark 2.2 and , further we get , and . Similarly, we can derive others trigonometric function periodic wave solutions.
We also have tested the correctness of each solution by using the software Mathematica. Here, we list two testing orders. Others testing orders are similar.()The orders for testing
Simplify . () The orders for testing
Simplify .
Acknowledgment
Research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 10871073) and the Research Expences of Central Universities for students.
References
B. Dey, βDomain wall solutions of KdV-like equations with higher order nonlinearity,β Journal of Physics A, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. L9βL12, 1986.
J. F. Zhang, βNew solitary wave solution of the combined KdV and mKdV equation,β International Journal of Theoretical Physics, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 1541β1546, 1998.
J. F. Zhang, F. M. Wu, and J. Q. Shi, βSimple solition solution method for the combined KdV and mKdV equation,β International Journal of Theoretical Physics, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 1697β1702, 2000.
J. Yu, βExact solitary wave solutions to a combined KdV and mKdV equation,β Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences, vol. 23, no. 18, pp. 1667β1670, 2000.
R. Grimshaw, D. Pelinovsky, E. Pelinovsky, and A. Slunyaev, βGeneration of large-amplitude solitons in the extended Korteweg-de Vries equation,β Chaos, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1070β1076, 2002.
E. G. Fan, βMultiple travelling wave solutions of nonlinear evolution equations using a unified algebraic method,β Journal of Physics A, vol. 35, no. 32, pp. 6853β6872, 2002.
E. G. Fan, βUniformly constructing a series of explicit exact solutions to nonlinear equations in mathematical physics,β Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 819β839, 2003.
M. Y. Tang, R. Q. Wang, and Z. J. Jing, βSolitary waves and their bifurcations of KdV like equation with higher order nonlinearity,β Science in China A, vol. 45, no. 10, pp. 1255β1267, 2002.
Y.-Z. Peng, βNew exact solutions to the combined KdV and mKdV equation,β International Journal of Theoretical Physics, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 863β868, 2003.
K. W. Chow, R. H. J. Grimshaw, and E. Ding, βInteractions of breathers and solitons in the extended Korteweg-de Vries equation,β Wave Motion, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 158β166, 2005.
D. Kaya and I. E. Inan, βA numerical application of the decomposition method for the combined KdVβMKdV equation,β Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 168, no. 2, pp. 915β926, 2005.
E. Yomba, βThe extended Fan's sub-equation method and its application to KdV-MKdV, BKK and variant Boussinesq equations,β Physics Letters A, vol. 336, no. 6, pp. 463β476, 2005.
W. G. Zhang and W. X. Ma, βExplicit solitary-wave solutions to generalized Pochhammer-Chree equations,β Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 625β632, 1999.
J. B. Li and L. J. Zhang, βBifurcations of traveling wave solutions in generalized Pochhammer-Chree equation,β Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 581β593, 2002.
D. Kaya, βThe exact and numerical solitary-wave solutions for generalized modified Boussinesq equation,β Physics Letters A, vol. 348, no. 3β6, pp. 244β250, 2006.
M. Rafei, D. D. Ganji, H. R. M. Daniali, and H. Pashaei, βApplication of homotopy perturbation method to the RLW and generalized modified Boussinesq equations,β Physics Letters A, vol. 364, no. 1, pp. 1β6, 2007.
R. Liu, βSome new results on explicit traveling wave solutions of equation,β Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems B, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 633β646, 2010.
M. Li, S. C. Lim, and S. Y. Chen, βExact solution of impulse response to a class of fractional oscillators and its stability,β Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2011, Article ID 657839, 9 pages, 2011.
J.-B. Li, βExact traveling wave solutions and dynamical behavior for the -dimensional multiple sine-Gordon equation,β Science in China A, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 153β164, 2007.
C. Cattani and G. Pierro, βComplexity on acute myeloid leukemia mRNA transcript variant,β Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2011, Article ID 379873, 16 pages, 2011.
C. Cattani and A. Kudreyko, βApplication of periodized harmonic wavelets towards solution of eigenvalue problems for integral equations,β Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2010, Article ID 570136, 8 pages, 2010.
Z. R. Liu and Z. Y. Ouyang, βA note on solitary waves for modified forms of Camassa-Holm and Degasperis-Procesi equations,β Physics Letters A, vol. 366, no. 4-5, pp. 377β381, 2007.
E. G. Bakhoum and C. Toma, βSpecific mathematical aspects of dynamics generated by coherence functions,β Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2011, Article ID 436198, 10 pages, 2011.
Q.-D. Wang and M.-Y. Tang, βNew explicit periodic wave solutions and their limits for modified form of Camassa-Holm equation,β Acta Mathematicae Applicatae Sinica, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 513β524, 2010.
E. G. Bakhoum and C. Toma, βMathematical transform of traveling-wave equations and phase aspects of quantum interaction,β Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2010, Article ID 695208, 15 pages, 2010.
R. Liu, βSeveral new types of solitary wave solutions for the generalized Camassa-Holm-Degasperis-Procesi equation,β Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 77β90, 2010.
S. Y. Chen, H. Tong, Z. Wang, S. Liu, M. Li, and B. Zhang, βImproved generalized belief propagation for vision processing,β Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2011, Article ID 416963, 12 pages, 2011.