A Data Envelopment-Based Clustering Approach for Public Sugar Factories in Privatizing Process
Table 2
Analytical results derived from M2 model for PSF.
PSF no.
PSF Name
Evaluated by the frontier of
1
Afyon
0.142
0.094
5.36
1
0.142
2***
Agri
0.099
0.691
0
0.816
0.109
0.816
3
Alpullu
0.115
0.076
4.358
0.813
0.142
4
Ankara
0.09
1.049
1.256
0.888
0.101
5
Bor
0.091
1.054
1.262
0.892
0.101
6
Burdur
0.1407
0.093
5.312
0.991
0.142
7*
Carsamba
0.104
0
0
0.641
0.142
0.631
8
Corum
0.119
0.619
5.36
1
0.119
9***
Elazig
0.099
0.692
0
0.818
0.109
0.816
10
Elbistan
0.093
0.87
0.836
0.854
0.109
11**
Ercis
0
4.369
0
1
0.101
1
12*
Eregli
0.139
0
5.36
0.952
0.142
0.949
13
Erzincan
0.098
1.142
1.367
0.967
0.101
14***
Erzurum
0.121
0.847
0
1
0.109
1
15
Eskisehir
0.116
0.605
5.24
0.978
0.119
16
Ilgin
0.138
0.091
5.195
0.969
0.142
17***
Kars
0.103
0.725
0
0.856
0.109
0.844
18
Kastamonu
0.126
0.083
4.748
0.886
0.142
19*
Kirsehir
0.139
0
4.981
0.948
0.142
0.947
20
Malatya
0.081
0.94
1.126
0.796
0.101
21**
Mus
0
3.659
4.428
1
0.101
1
22
Susurluk
0.066
0.769
0.921
0.651
0.101
23
Turhal
0.123
0.082
4.657
0.869
0.142
24
Usak
0.101
0.944
0.907
0.927
0.109
25
Yozgat
0.142
0.094
5.36
1
0.142
*They are reevaluated by , because of zero virtual multipliers.
**They are reevaluated by because of zero virtual multipliers.
***They are reevaluated by because of zero virtual multipliers.
