Research Article | Open Access

# Consecutive -within--out-of-:F System with Nonidentical Components

**Academic Editor:**Alexander P. Seyranian

#### Abstract

As a generalisation of consecutive -out-of-:F and -out-of-:F system models, a consecutive -within--out-of-:F system consists of linearly ordered components and fails if and only if there are consecutive components which include among them at least failed components. In this paper, we study the survival function of a consecutive -within--out-of-:F system consisting of independent but nonidentical components. We obtain exact expressions for the survival function when . A detailed analysis for consecutive 2-within--out-of-:F systems is presented and the asymptotic behaviour of hazard rate of these systems is investigated using mixture representations.

#### 1. Introduction

It is a well-accepted fact that all components in an engineered system are not created equal. This in turn implies that different components may have different survival probabilities. The study of systems consisting of nonidentical components is a difficult task especially when the system has a complex structure. Some recent contributions on systems with independent but nonidentical components appear in Navarro [1], Zhao et al. [2], Kochar and Xu [3], and Navarro et al. [4].

Consecutive type systems have been extensively studied in the literature. One of the most widely studied consecutive type system is a linear consecutive -out-of-:F system which consists of linearly ordered components and fails if and only if at least consecutive components fail. This type of systems is potentially useful for modeling transportation and transmission systems. Much of the previous research has concentrated on the optimal design or reliability computation of such systems. There are several papers which study the dynamic reliability properties of consecutive -out-of- systems. Boland and Samaniego [5] obtained some stochastic ordering results on lifetimes of consecutive -out-of- systems consisting of independent components. Triantafyllou and Koutras [6] studied the lifetime distribution of consecutive -out-of-:F systems consisting of independent and identical components. A review of recent developments on consecutive -out-of- and related systems is presented in Eryilmaz [7].

In this paper we study the dynamic reliability of consecutive -within--out-of-:F systems consisting of independent but nonidentical (inid) components. A consecutive -within--out-of-:F system consists of linearly ordered components and fails if and only if there are consecutive components which include among them at least -failed components (). There are numerous applications for such systems in practice, for example, quality control, inspection procedures, radar detection, transportation, and transmission systems (see, e.g., Chang et al. [8]). A consecutive -within--out-of-:F system involves consecutive -out-of-:F and -out-of-:F (a system which fails if and only if at least components fail) systems for and , respectively. The dynamic reliability properties of consecutive -within--out-of-:F systems with identical components have been studied in several papers (Papastavridis [9], Iyer [10], Eryilmaz et al. [11], Eryilmaz and Kan [12], Triantafyllou and Koutras [13]).

Consecutive -within--out-of-:F system can be represented as a series system of -dependent -out-of-:F systems. That is, the lifetime of this system can be expressed as where shows the lifetime of -out-of-:F subsystem of components with the lifetimes .

The evaluation of the survival function associated with is of special importance for understanding the dynamic behaviour of the system since the reliability characteristics such as hazard rate and mean residual life function can be obtained from this function. In the present paper, we obtain expressions for the survival functions of consecutive -within--out-of-:F systems for when the components are independent but not necessarily identically distributed. In Section 2, a detailed analysis for consecutive 2-within--out-of-:F systems is presented. Section 3 contains results for .

In the following, we provide the notations that will be used throughout the paper. is the number of components; is the lifetime of component ; is the state of component at time : if ; is the lifetime of consecutive -within--out-of-:F system; is th smallest among ; is the survival function of consecutive -within--out-of-:F system; is the hazard rate of consecutive -within--out-of-:F system.

Throughout the paper the components are assumed to be independent and the survival function associated with the th component is .

#### 2. Results for Consecutive 2-within--out-of-:F Systems

If represent the lifetimes of components in a coherent system, then the system lifetime can be represented aswhere are the minimal path sets. If are independent, then the system survival function can be computed from the series survival functions as where , , and .

The hazard rate associated with the subset of (2.2) is

where is the hazard rate associated with .

*Example 2.1. *Let , and . Then the path sets of consecutive 2-within-3-out-of-4:F system are , , , , , and . The minimal path sets are , , and . Therefore
and hence the survival function of consecutive 2-within-3-out-of-4:F system is
which is a mixture of series survival functions with the weight vector . The hazard rates of each element of (2.5) are

Lemma 2.2. *For the consecutive 2-within--out-of-:F system has path sets, and these sets are
*

*Proof. *For , the consecutive 2-within--out-of-:F system works if and only if there is no failed component or there is only one failed component or there are at most two failed components separated by at least working components. Thus the proof is complete.

The following results are direct consequences of Lemma 2.2.

Lemma 2.3. *For , the consecutive 2-within--out-of-:F system has minimal path sets with elements. These minimal path sets are
*

Lemma 2.4. *Let be inid lifetimes of components with . For ,
*

Theorem 2.5. *
[1] Let be a survival function such that
**
for all , where are real numbers such that . Let be the failure rate function corresponding to . If
**
for , then , where is the failure rate function corresponding to .*

In the following, one will study the limiting behaviour of the hazard rate of a consecutive 2-within--out-of-:F system.

Theorem 2.6. *Let be independent and the hazard rate of is . For , if and , then
**
where .*

*Proof. *From Lemma 2.3, the minimum number of elements in the minimal path sets of consecutive 2-within--out-of- system is (for ) and the total number of these minimal path sets is . Thus the proof follows from Theorem 2.5 and the conditions of Theorem 2.6.

*Example 2.7. *Let , and . Suppose that and . Then using the hazard rates given in (2.6), we have
for . Therefore

#### 3. General Results

The reliability of consecutive -within--out-of-:F system is closely related to the discrete scan statistic defined by

A consecutive -within--out-of-:F system survives at time if and only if less than components are failed among any consecutive components. Thus its survival function can be expressed as

or equivalently,

for and .

The proof of the following result is easy and hence is omitted.

Lemma 3.1. *For and ,
**
for and ,
**
and for and ,
*

Theorem 3.2. *For ,
**
where is the reliability of consecutive -within--out-of-:F system with components .*

*Proof. *By the definition of ,

For ,
where
If denotes the scan statistic based on , then
Thus the proof is completed by the independence of and and

Theorem 2.6 can be extended to any consecutive -within--out-of-:F system in the following way.

Theorem 3.3. *Let be independent and the hazard rate of is . For , if and , then
**
where is the number of minimal path sets with elements and is the maximum number of failed components such that the system can still work.*

The number has been derived in Eryilmaz and Kan [12] as

*Example 3.4. *Let , and . Then and there is only one minimal path set with elements, that is, and the corresponding minimal path set is . Thus under the conditions of Theorem 3.3, we have

#### Acknowledgment

The author would like to express gratitude to the referee for a thorough review and valuable comments that led to some improvements in this article.

#### References

- J. Navarro, “Tail hazard rate ordering properties of order statistics and coherent systems,”
*Naval Research Logistics*, vol. 54, no. 8, pp. 820–828, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet - P. Zhao, X. Li, and N. Balakrishnan, “Conditional ordering of
*k*-out-of-*n*systems with independent but nonidentical components,”*Journal of Applied Probability*, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 1113–1125, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - S. Kochar and M. Xu, “On residual lifetimes of
*k*-out-of-*n*systems with nonidentical components,”*Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences*, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 109–127, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - J. Navarro, F. J. Samaniego, and N. Balakrishnan, “Signature-based representations for the reliability of systems with heterogeneous components,”
*Journal of Applied Probability*, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 856–867, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - P. J. Boland and F. J. Samaniego, “Stochastic ordering results for consecutive
*k*-out-of-*n*: F systems,”*IEEE Transactions on Reliability*, vol. 53, pp. 7–10, 2004. View at: Google Scholar - I. S. Triantafyllou and M. V. Koutras, “On the signature of coherent systems and applications,”
*Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences*, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 19–35, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH | MathSciNet - S. Eryilmaz, “Review of recent advances in reliability of consecutive k-out-of-n and related systems,”
*Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O: Journal of Risk and Reliability*, vol. 224, no. 3, pp. 225–237, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - G. J. Chang, L. Cui, and F. K. Hwang,
*Reliabilities of Consecutive-k Systems*, vol. 4, Kluwer Academic, Dodrecht, The Netherlands, 2000. View at: Zentralblatt MATH - S. G. Papastavridis, “A Weibull limit for the reliability of a consecutive
*k*-within-*m*-out-of-*n*system,”*Advances in Applied Probability*, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 690–692, 1988. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet - Iyer, “Distribution of the lifetime of consecutive
*k*-within-*m*-out-of-*n*: F systems,”*IEEE Transactions on Reliability*, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 448–450, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - S. Eryilmaz, C. Kan, and F. Akıcı, “Consecutive
*k*-within-*m*-out-of-*n*: F system with exchangeable components,”*Naval Research Logistics*, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 503–510, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - S. Eryilmaz and C. Kan, “Dynamic reliability evaluation of consecutive-
*k*-within-*m*-out-of-*n*system,”*Communications in Statistics. Simulation and Computation*, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 70–83, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - I. S. Triantafyllou and M. V. Koutras, “Signature and IFR preservation of 2-within-consecutive
*k*-out-of-*n*: F Systems,”*IEEE Transactions on Reliability*, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 315–322, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

#### Copyright

Copyright © 2012 Serkan Eryilmaz. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.