Security-Constrained Unit Commitment Based on a Realizable Energy Delivery Formulation

Table 6

Numerical testing results for example 2: general results with different horizons.

LR					MILP
Day	CPU time^1 (s)	Feasible cost ($)	Duality gap (%)	Iteration number (B&B)	CPU time^2 (s)	Feasible cost ($)
1	8.1	1984081	0.75	124	6.8	1979625
2	18.1	3749990	0.73	248	13.9	3746033
3	27.3	5713873	0.82	372	25.1	5712852
4	45.7	7591807	0.76	496	63.2	7591460
5	72.1	9420439	0.89	620	93.6	9421239
6	92.7	10850249	0.84	744	138.9	10852089
7	130.8	12235715	0.91	868	199.2	12236687