Research Article | Open Access

# Chaos Generated by Switching Fractional Systems

**Academic Editor:**Xing-Gang Yan

#### Abstract

We, for the first time, investigate the basic behaviours of a chaotic switching fractional system via both theoretical and numerical ways. To deeply understand the mechanism of the chaos generation, we also analyse the parameterization of the switching fractional system and the dynamics of the system's trajectory. Then we try to write down some detailed rules for designing chaotic or chaos-like systems by switching fractional systems, which can be used in the future application. At last, for the first time, we proposed a new switching fractional system, which can generate three attractors with the positive largest Lyapunov exponent.

#### 1. Introduction

Over the last two decades, since chaos has been demonstrated that it can be useful and well controlled [1–3], increasing interests have been found in many areas such as secure communication [4], data encryption [5], nonlinear optimization [6], synchronization [7], and biology [8] (for more areas, see [3]). Therefore, generating chaos, especially generating chaos via simple physical devices, has been paid extensive and massive attention [9–14]. Just like the -scroll Chua’s circuit [15], switching piecewise-linear function can easily generate various chaos dynamic behaviours. Especially the literatures [16–18] and give great details to generate chaos via switching systems.

On the other hand, fractional calculus is a mathematical branch which has more than 300 years of history but just been interested recently in physics [19], chemistry, biology, and engineering [20]. Since fractional-order calculus can be treated as an expanding concept of integer-order calculus, there are many chaos systems that are expanded from integer-order ones: the fractional-order Chua system [21, 22], the fractional-order Duffing system [23], the fractional jerk model [24], the fractional-order Lorenz system [25], the fractional-order Chen system [26], the fractional-order Lü system [27], the fractional-order Rössler system [28], the fractional-order Arneodo system [29], the fractional-order Newton-Leipnik system [30], and the fractional-order Genesio-Tesi system [31]. And also, the fractional-order Ikeda delay system [32], non-integer-order cellular neural networks [33], and the fractional-order systems proposed in [34, 35] all can generate chaos.

Generating a new chaotic or chaos-like system is always on the core of the chaos research with great theoretical and applied meanings. In addition a new chaotic system usually gets more complex dynamic behaviours being less recognized by people who does not catch up with the nonlinear dynamics. Thus, a new chaos system may be popular used in chaotic secure communication and encryption. Not like lots of the existing switching systems literatures [15–18], there are few literatures about switching fractional systems, even generating a fractional chaos easily is an increasing topic of many applied and theoretical fields. Also, as far as we know, there have not been basic dynamical behaviours given to any chaotic or chaos-like switching fractional systems ever. A significant work of switching fractional systems is proposed by S. Mohammad and H. Mohammad in [36]. The paper discussed the switching rules and how to choose the parameters to generate chaos and the rule of designing switching function have been discussed. However, the detailed relationship between the parameters and the behaviours of the chaos has not been discussed, not even being part of some analysis of the basic behaviours of the systems. In the present paper, we try to research the relationship between the parameters of the system and the behaviours of the chaos in both analytic and numerical ways. And we even epitomized some more detailed rules of generating chaotic or chaos-like dynamic behaviours via switching fractional systems then Mohammad did. Under these rules, we can generate chaotic or chaos-like dynamic behaviours easily via simple switching fractional systems. At last, we propose a new chaotic or chaos-like switching fractional system and count out its Lyapunov exponent.

The paper is organized as follows. Section 2 introduces basic definitions and some theories and lemmas, which are useful in following sections. In Section 3, we analyse an existing chaos generator and do numerical simulations to research quantificationally the relationship between the parameter and the dynamic behaviours. And we propose a new switching fractional systems, which can generate chaotic or chaos-like dynamic behaviours. Finally Section 4 concludes the paper.

#### 2. Background of Fractional Calculus

##### 2.1. Basic Definitions

There exits three main definitions of fractional-order derivatives. They are Grünwald-Letnikov fractional derivatives (G-L): Riemann-Liouville fractional derivatives (R-L): and Caputo’s fractional derivative:

And since they can transform to each other, our use of fractional derivatives can be free for all of these three definitions.

##### 2.2. Some Theories and Lemmas

For the requirement in the next part, we list several theories and lemmas. All of them come from [37].

We first define [36]. denotes the contour consisting of the following three parts:

(i),

(ii),

(iii).

More details of can be found in literature [36].

Lemma 2.1. *If , and is arbitrary, for arbitrary complex the following expansion holds:
**
here is Euler’s gamma function.*

Lemma 2.2. *If , , one obtains
*

Theorem 2.3. *If , is an arbitrary complex number, and is an arbitrary real number such that
**
then for an arbitrary integer the following expansion holds:
**
where
*

Using Lemma 2.1 and Theorem 2.3, if , , we can quickly obtain the following: which will be used in the next section of our paper.

Consider the following initial value problem for a nonhomogeneous fraction differential equation under nonzero initial conditions: then we obtain the following solution:

#### 3. Chaos Generation

##### 3.1. Analysis of an Existing Chaos Generator

First, we discuss the chaos generated by the switching fractional system and with the switching function (3.2): where ,

This kind of chaos was proposed by the literature [36]. That paper has discussed how to design the switching rule to generate chaos, how to choose the parameters to generate chaos, and how to design the switching function to generate chaos. Here we want to discuss the dynamic behaviours of the chaos more carefully and research the relationship between the parameters of the system and the dynamic behaviours of the chaos more carefully and quantificationally.

Here we design the switching rule as follows: when is active, the system will switch to at the time with the initial condition of being . Similarly, when is active, the system will switch to at the time with the initial condition of being .

And we take to be asymptotically stable and take to be unstable. Then we get the restricted conditions of the parameters: , , , and or or , only one of the establishments of the last three conditions is enough. Here we choose and make , so that, under the discussion in paper [36], the switching fractional system will perform chaos.

Then we want to discuss the dynamic behaviours of the chaos more carefully. The switching function (3.2) and the switching rules divide the whole space into two regions, which we denote and, respectively. When the system is in , is active. Since is asymptotically stable, will converge to its fixed point, which will be discussed in the following. Either the system orbits reach or does not reach the fixed point, because , as we take above, the system orbits will go through the plane and then switch to . When the system is in , is active. Since is unstable, the system orbits will diverge and go through the plane and then switch to. We will discuss and in the following analytically, respectively.

We first rewrite as follows: where

And we can obtain the eigenvalues: . Under the constricted conditions of the parameters, we can obtain

Since the eigenvalues are different, we obtain a transformation matrix: so that we obtain where

Because of (3.5), we can solve the transformed fractional differential equations (3.7) in the solution (2.12) with (2.9), so that we obtain

By using Lemma 2.2, we obtain

Taking (2.10) into account, we obtain

Using (3.8), we can obtain

taking (3.10) and (3.12) into account, we can obtain when

So we see that the trajectory of is a spiral line. And is the fixed point of . And we can slightly change the restricted condition of the parameters to

For , taking , we can obtain

Then we can quickly write when

So we see that the trajectory of will fall into the plane . For, because of their complexity, we do not give their analytic solutions.

##### 3.2. Numerical Simulations

Now we can do some numerical simulations and research in quantities of relationship between the parameters and the dynamic behaviours of the chaos. We take all the parameters under the restricted conditions we proposed above, so that the switching fractional system (3.1) will show chaos behaviours. Below in this part, we take . Taking the parameters: , , , , , , , the switching fractional system (3.1) has a chaotic attractor, which is shown in Figure 1. The maximum Lyapunov exponent of this attractor is . And Figure 2 shows the directions of the trajectory of the switching fractional system (3.1) under the parameters: , , , , , , . The trajectory is denoted by the arrows.

We first focus on the parameters and . In this segment, we fix the parameters: , , , , . We first take the parameter and increase from 6 to 7 with step 1. Figure 3 shows the phase portraits of the switching fractional system (3.1) under these parameters. From Figure 3, we can conclude that the increase of makes converge faster. This conclusion is established in all conditions, which satisfy and . Then we take the parameter and increase from 0.5 to 0.6 with step 0.1. Figure 4 shows the phase portraits of the switching fractional system (3.1) under these parameters. From Figure 4, we can conclude that the increase of makes converge slower. This conclusion is established in all conditions, which satisfy and .

**(a)**

**(b)**

**(a)**

**(b)**

Then we focus on the parameters and . In this segment, we fix the parameters: , , , , . We increase and simultaneously from 1 to 2 with step 1. Figure 5 shows the phase portraits of the switching fractional system (3.1) under these parameters. From Figure 5, we can conclude that the increase of makes reach the plane faster. This conclusion is established in all conditions, which satisfy .

**(a)**

**(b)**

For , we first focus on the parameters and . In this segment, we fix the parameters: , , , , . We first take the parameter and increase from 1 to 3 with step 2. Figure 6 shows the phase portraits of the switching fractional system (3.1) under these parameters. From Figure 6, we can conclude that the increase of makes diverge faster. This conclusion is established in all conditions, which satisfy and Then we take the parameter and increase from 3 to 6 with step 3. Figure 7 shows the phase portraits of the switching fractional system (3.1) under these parameters. From Figure 7, we can conclude that the increase of makes diverge slower. This conclusion is established in all conditions, which satisfy and .

**(a)**

**(b)**

**(a)**

**(b)**

Then we focus on the parameters . In this segment, we fix the parameters: , , , , , . We increase from 1 to 2 with step 1. Figure 8 shows the phase portraits of the switching fractional system (3.1) under these parameters. From Figure 8, we can conclude that the increase of makes reach the plane

**(a)**

**(b)**

faster. This conclusion is established in all conditions, which satisfy .

##### 3.3. More Detailed Rules to Design Chaotic or Chaos-Like Fractional Switching Systems

Here we epitomize some more detailed rules of relationship of the dynamic behaviours of the switching fractional systems and the parameters of the switching fractional systems. Take the switching fractional system (3.1) with the parameters under the restricted conditions of the parameters, which we proposed previously, for example. There are two fixed points of the switching fractional system (3.1). The parameters , , and control the speed of the switching fractional system to reach the fixed points, respectively. The parameters and control the speed of to diverge. The parameters and control the speed of to converge. Taking the experiments, we did above, into account, we conclude that if we want the switching fractional system to arrive at the fixed points faster, we can increase the parameters , , and . However, , , and should also not be so large that the orbits of the switching fractional system will cross through the plane , because the sum will be bigger or smaller than 0, respectively; if we want to diverge faster, we can increase the parameter or decrease the parameter ; if we want to converge faster, we can increase the parameter or decrease the parameter .

So the rules are that we should balance all the parameters when we apply the rules obtained in the literature [36]. If we find that converges too fast, we may decrease the value of either or or increase ; it is also very similar to . But remember if either or converges or diverges so fast that it cannot reach its own fixed point plane, the pattern we get may not show two attractors. Even if we obey these rules, we can design a chaotic or chaos-like switching fractional system with a wide range of the parameter values.

##### 3.4. A New Chaotic or Chaos-Like Switching Fractional System

Under the rules above, we here propose a new chaotic or chaos-like switching fractional system , , and with the switching function (3.2). Actually, under the rules above, lots of chaotic or chaos-like switching fractional systems can also be proposed: where ,

We take the switching rule as follows: when is active, the system will switch to at the time and with the initial condition of being and the system will switch to at the time and with the initial condition of being . When is active, the system will switch to at the time with the initial condition of being . When is active, the system will switch to at the time with the initial condition of being .

We take , to be asymptotically stable, while we take to be unstable. Then we determine the parameters:

We take the parameters: , , , , , , , , , , , . The switching fractional system (3.27), has a chaotic attractor, which is shown in Figure 9. The maximum Lyapunov exponent of this attractor is .

We take the parameters: , , , , , , , , , , The switching fractional system (3.27), has a chaotic attractor, which is shown in Figure 10. The maximum Lyapunov exponent of this attractor is. From Figure 10, we can obtain that the switching fractional system (3.27), under variant parameters can also perform chaotic or chaos-like dynamic behaviours.

#### 4. Conclusions

In this paper, we for the first time study the basic behaviours of a chaotic switching fractional system both theoretically and numerically. We also analyse the parameterization of the switching fractional system and the dynamics of the system’s trajectory. Then we try to write down some more detailed rules for designing chaotic or chaos-like systems by switching fractional systems based on the basic rules given in the literature [36]. At last, for the first time, we proposed a new switching fractional system, which can generate three attractors with the positive largest Lyapunov exponent.

#### Acknowledgments

This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 61173183, 60973152, and 60573172), the Superior University Doctor Subject Special Scientific Research Foundation of China (no. 20070141014), and the Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province (no. 20082165).

#### References

- L. M. Pecora and T. L. Carroll, “Synchronization in chaotic systems,”
*Physical Review Letters*, vol. 64, no. 8, pp. 821–824, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH - J. Meng and X. Y. Wang, “Generalized synchronization via nonlinear control,”
*Chaos*, vol. 18, no. 3, article 023108, 5 pages, 2008. View at: Google Scholar - G. R. Chen and X. N. Dong,
*From Chaos to Order: Methodologies, Perspectivesand Applications*, World Scientific, Singapore, 1998. - X. Y. Wang, B. Xu, and H. G. Zhang, “A multi-ary number communication system based on hyperchaotic system of 6th-order cellular neural network,”
*Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation*, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 124–133, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - H. J. Liu and X. Y. Wang, “Color image encryption based on one-time keys and robust chaotic maps,”
*Computers & Mathematics with Applications*, vol. 59, no. 10, pp. 3320–3327, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH - Z. Lu, L.-S. Shieh, and G. R. Chen, “Simplex sliding mode control for nonlinear uncertain systems via chaos optimization,”
*Chaos, Solitons and Fractals*, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 747–755, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH - X. Y. Wang, M. G. Wang, and Z. Z. Liu, “Chaos synchronization basing on symbolic dynamics with nongenerating partition,”
*Chaos*, vol. 19, no. 2, article 023108, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - M. Kyriazis, “Practical applications of chaos theory to the modulation of human ageing: nature prefers chaos to regularity,”
*Biogerontology*, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 75–90, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - K.-S. Tang, K. F. Man, G.-Q. Zhong, and G. Chen, “Generating chaos via $\text{x}|\text{x}|$,”
*IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems*, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 636–641, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH - X. F. Wang and G. R. Chen, “Generating topologically conjugate chaotic systems via feedback control,”
*IEEE Transactions on Circuits & Systems*, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 812–817, 2003. View at: Google Scholar - G. Q. Zhong, K. F. Man, and G. R. Chen, “Generating chaos via a dynamical controller,”
*International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos*, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 865–869, 2001. View at: Google Scholar - J. H. Lü and G. R. Chen, “Generating multiscroll chaotic attractors: theories, methods and applications,”
*International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos in Applied Sciences and Engineering*, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 775–858, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH - X. F. Wang, G. R. Chen, and X. H. Yu, “Anticontrol of chaos in continuous-time systems via time-delay feedback,”
*Chaos*, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 771–779, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH - X. F. Wang and G. R. Chen, “Chaotifying a stable linear system via tiny feedback control,”
*IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems*, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 410–415, 2000. View at: Google Scholar - J. A. K. Suykens and J. Vandewalle, “Generation of n-double scrolls (n : 1, 2, 3, 4, … ),”
*IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems*, vol. 40, no. 11, pp. 861–867, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - J. H. Lü, T. S. Zhou, G. R. Chen, and X. S. Yang, “Generating chaos with aswitching piecewise-linear controller,”
*Chaos*, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 344–349, 2002. View at: Google Scholar - Z. H. Zheng, J. H. Lü, G. R. Chen, T. S. Zhou, and S. C. Zhang, “Generating two simultaneously chaotic attractors with a switching piecewise-linear controller,”
*Chaos, Solitons and Fractals*, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 277–288, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH - J. H. Lü, X. H. Yu, and G. R. Chen, “Generating chaotic attractors with multiple merged basins of attraction: a switching piecewise-linear control approach,”
*IEEE Transaction on Circuits and Systems*, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 198–207, 2003. View at: Google Scholar - E. Goldfain, “Fractional dynamics and the standard model for particle physics,”
*Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation*, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 1397–1404, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - X. Y. Wang and Y. H. He, “Projective synchronization of fractional order chaotic system based on linear separation,”
*Physics Letters, Section A*, vol. 372, no. 4, pp. 435–441, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - T. T. Hartley, C. F. Lorenzo, and H. K. Qammer, “Chaos in a fractional order Chua's system,”
*IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems*, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 485–490, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - I. Petráš, “A note on the fractional-order Chua's system,”
*Chaos, Solitons & Fractals*, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 140–147, 2008. View at: Google Scholar - Z.-M. Ge and C.-Y. Ou, “Chaos in a fractional order modified Duffing system,”
*Chaos, Solitons and Fractals*, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 262–291, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - W. M. Ahmad and J. C. Sprott, “Chaos in fractional-order autonomous nonlinear systems,”
*Chaos, Solitons and Fractals*, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 339–351, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - I. Grigorenko and E. Grigorenko, “Chaotic dynamics of the fractional Lorenz system,”
*Physical Review Letters*, vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 034101/1–034101/4, 2003. View at: Google Scholar - C. G. Li and G. R. Chen, “Chaos in the fractional order Chen system and its control,”
*Chaos, Solitons and Fractals*, vol. 22, pp. 549–554, 2004. View at: Google Scholar - S. T. Mohammad and H. Mohammad, “A necessary condition for double scroll attractor existence in fractional-order systems,”
*Physics Letters, Section A*, vol. 367, no. 1-2, pp. 102–113, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - C. G. Li and G. R. Chen, “Chaos and hyperchaos in the fractional-order Rössler equations,”
*Physica A*, vol. 341, no. 1-4, pp. 55–61, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - J. G. Lu, “Chaotic dynamics and synchronization of fractional-order Arneodo's systems,”
*Chaos, Solitons and Fractals*, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 1125–1133, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - L.-J. Sheu, H.-K. Chen, J.-H. Chen et al., “Chaos in the Newton-Leipnik system with fractional order,”
*Chaos, Solitons and Fractals*, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 98–103, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH - J. G. Lu, “Chaotic dynamics and synchronization of fractional-order Genesio-Tesi systems,”
*Chinese Physics*, vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 1517–1521, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - J. G. Lu, “Chaotic dynamics of the fractional-order Ikeda delay system and its synchronization,”
*Chinese Physics*, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 301–305, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar - P. Arena, R. Caponetto, L. Fortuna, and D. Porto, “Bifurcation and chaos in noninteger order cellular neural networks,”
*International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos in Applied Sciences and Engineering*, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 1527–1539, 1998. View at: Google Scholar - W. H. Deng and J. H. Lü, “Design of multidirectional multiscroll chaotic attractors based on fractional differential systems via switching control,”
*Chaos*, vol. 16, no. 4, article 043120, 8 pages, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH - W. H. Deng and J. H. Lü, “Generating multi-directional multi-scroll chaotic attractors via a fractional differential hysteresis system,”
*Physics Letters A*, vol. 369, pp. 438–443, 2007. View at: Google Scholar - S. T. Mohammad and H. Mohammad, “Chaos generation via a switching fractional multi-model system,”
*Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Applications*, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 332–340, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | Zentralblatt MATH - I. Podlubny,
*Fractional Differential Equations*, Academic Press, San Diego, Calif, USA, 1999.

#### Copyright

Copyright © 2012 Wang Xingyuan and Qin Xue. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.