Research Article  Open Access
Zou Huifen, Ye Sheng, Wang Dexi, Li Huixing, Cao Xiaozhen, Yan Lijun, "Model of Mass and Heat Transfer during Vacuum FreezeDrying for Cornea", Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2012, Article ID 941609, 16 pages, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/941609
Model of Mass and Heat Transfer during Vacuum FreezeDrying for Cornea
Abstract
Cornea is the important apparatus of organism, which has complex cell structure. Heat and mass transfer and thermal parameters during vacuum freezedrying of keeping corneal activity are studied. The freezedrying cornea experiments were operated in the homemade vacuum freeze dryer. Pressure of the freezedrying box was about 50 Pa and temperature was about −10°C by controlled, and operating like this could guarantee survival ratio of the corneal endothelium over the grafting normal. Theory analyzing of corneal freezedrying, mathematical model of describing heat and mass transfer during vacuum freezedrying of cornea was established. The analogy computation for the freezedrying of cornea was made by using finiteelement computational software. When pressure of the freezedrying box was about 50 Pa and temperature was about −10°C, time of doubleside drying was 170 min. In this paper, a movinggrid finiteelement method was used. The sublimation interface was tracked continuously. The finiteelement mesh is moved continuously such that the interface position always coincides with an element node. Computational precision was guaranteed. The computational results were agreed with the experimental results. It proved that the mathematical model was reasonable. The finiteelement software is adapted for calculating the heat and mass transfer of corneal freezedrying.
1. Introduction
The storage of isolated freezedrying biological tissue is a significant field in the application of vacuum freezedrying technology and studies for its mass and heat transfer theory under lowtemperature, lowpressure conditions which have already become a hot frontal topic in theoretical researches. The vacuum freezedrying of cornea (freezedry) is the freezedrying for isolated biological tissue which has to remain active afterwards.
The first step during a freezedrying process is prefreeze, which could affect the activity and the drying rate of cornea. Drying process is to remove the moisture inside cornea, while heat and mass transfer is progressing on a much harder and more complex level. In a drying process of medicine or food, ambient temperature could be increased moderately to provide sufficient heat or heating the material directly in the second step and the resolution process of adsorbed moisture could hence been accelerated which results in a more costeffective way of freezedrying. Time and cost is not a critical factor during a freezedrying process, it is all about to reduce the risk of cornea being spoiled throughout the drill. Therefore, the time should be minimized in freezedrying of cornea in order to obtain higher survival chance for corneal endothelial cells. But due to the limitation of corneal cell’s configuration, underneath the external surface (endothelial cell and epidermal cell), there is an elastic layer that resists the diffusion of the moisture within the matrix (moisture in the matrix count for 90% of the overall water content). If the temperature of sublimation front is too high, as higher level of vapor in sublimation, the internal pressure in the cornea will rise correspondingly, which leads to two circumstances as follow. (1) If the vacuum degree inside the freezedrying chamber is high and the pressure is low at the meantime, the inner and outer pressure of cornea would achieve a relatively high level that leads to the exposure of moisture inside the cornea through the external surface. Epidermal cell and endothelial cell might drop off, leading to the whole process become meaningless. (2) If the pressure within the drying chamber is at an appropriate rate with the pressure of the cornea, but the temperature of sublimation interface is swelling up which leads to vapor increase and melting of the freezelayer, resulting in death or injury of cells and loss of the freezedrying condition. By calculating the theoretical model, seeking for the appropriate temperature and pressure for the will of freezedrying experiment results could be insured as being optimized and stabilized.
A number of models on freezedrying have been mentioned in many researches [1–11] aiming to describe the process. The sorptionsublimation model presented by Liapis and Litchfield is the most widely used one and character as the synch of sorption and sublimation of moisture, also, the removal of bounded water is considered in the equation. The result of this modeling agrees with Moffert’s research. However, the model is of one dimension, in the process of freezedrying, the sublimate interface arises with the drying procedure. Liapis and Litchfield employ a onedimensional moving interface [12], thus the prerequisite of material applied have to be onedimension with no bent at any angle. Tang et al. [13] have modified this model into two dimensions to describe the freezedrying of drugs in the penicillin vial, this 2D model could accurately reflect the position and shape of the sublimation interface, ergo; it can simulate the actual progress. Millman et al. have further the model that presented by Tang [14], in which the new model could allow the material form in arbitrary shape. The characteristics of this model is to involve more factors with less limitation, therefore, it has been widely used. But due to the complexity of the model, and the numerous parameters that have to be considered, the application of this model run encounters difficulties.
Models mentioned above were solved by program which developed by themselves, and studied material is at least more than 5 mm, and the cornea is only 0.6 mm thick. The use of the material has certain degree of difficult as the heat and mass transfer have their own characteristics. This article combine the advancement of Millman’s model and finite element analysis software, constructing the 2D model of freezedrying process of cornea that allow the sublimation and desorption happen simultaneously, taking into account of the removal of bounded moisture. Also, 2D approach has been applied to fix the mobile interface. Smallscale changes base on the present software have been done to simulate the heat and mass transfer of freezedrying cornea. The calculated results are basically consistent with the experimental data and more details have described as follows.
2. Establishment of Mathematical Model
2.1. Hypothesis
The establishment of mathematical model is refered to the coupled equation of heat and mass transfer which is developed by Millman. In this article, assumptions have been made as follows, relating to the establishment of finite element model.(1)The 2D dimensional heat and mass transfer is considered.(2)The interface thickness was thought to be infinitely small (the assumption has been confirmed in many researches [15]).(3)The mixture of water vapor and permanent gases flow passes the drying layer.(4)The concentration of vapor and ice phase equilibrium is at the interface.(5)The semidry layer is a porous region due to the back of sublimation interface, drymaterial, and adsorbedwater (solid phase) were inside the region. The gas consists of vapor and permanent gases, which were considered to maintain thermal equilibrium with the solid phase.(6)Surface and interface temperature stay unchanged.(7)The frozen zone is assumed to be uniform and has uniform thermal conductivity, density and specific heat, also it contains small amount of dissolved gases.(8)Changes of the overall size of cornea are out of question.(9)The total pressure of the drying chamber was controlled by appropriatesize vacuum pump and required devices (most of the permanent gases in the chamber was considered leak in).
2.2. Mass Transfer Equation
Continuity equations of drylayer can be expressed as follows:
in which
is the density of water in solid phase when watergas equilibrium was achieved.
Equations (2.4) and (2.5) are the masstrans rate formula of binary mixture pass through the dry zone, based on diffusion equation (Evans et al. [16]) and viscous flow formula (D′Arcy). In the formula, the main vapor diffusion is passing through the dry layer, and escaping by way of Knudsen diffusion and the corresponding total pressure gradient; also with no consideration of surface diffusion and thermal diffusion model as such diffusion is not significant [17]. It has been proved that the role of viscous flow is not that important for and [18]. Knudsen diffusion is the most important one in the case of low/permanent gas nonexist. However, main diffusion controls the rate when they do exist. Therefore, (2.4) and (2.5) can be simplified as
By (2.1) and (2.4), we obtain:
The work in [17] has proved that permanent gas got a very small change rate; (2.9) could hence be solved without (2.10). Therefore, the following manipulating only includes finite element formulation for (2.9).
In the 2D symmetric space, (2.9) can be expressed as
Under low pressure, the concentration of water vapor and permanent gases can be expressed by using the ideal gas law:
So, (2.11) can be described by the following equation:
and assuming that
by (2.13) and (2.14), we obtain
2.3. Heat Transfer Equation
In a 2D symmetric space, energy equation for drylayer is
Frozen layer energy equation is
2.4. Concentration Equation
Moisture concentration change in the dry layer versus time can be described as
2.5. Initial and Boundary Condition
When ,
When ,
Equation (2.20) specified the boundary value of pressure and temperature. The concentration equation is an issue relating to initial value, with no consideration of any boundary conditions.
3. The Trajectory of the Sublimation Interface
During the process of drying, the sublimation latent heat was released at the sublimation interface, and the sublimation heat was added as boundary condition when solving a series of control equation. It, hence, becomes necessary to track the location of the interface and impose boundary conditions on the interface spot. The movement of the interface is affirmed by exam the equilibrium of heat at the interface. In the case of noninternal heat source, the heat originates from the dried layer equals to the total heat both from the absorption and the heat flowed to the frozen layer. The heat balance equation can be expressed as follows:
in which
The velocity of interface perpendicular to the interface itself, and could conclude from (3.2) in order to obtain the new interface location. Numerous numerical calculation techniques were used to solve the problem of moving interface, in the paper, however, the finitegridelement method has been used [13], where the sublimation interface was tracked consecutively and the interface was assumed to be boundary condition of the move. The finite grid would be redivided when changes occur in the sublimation interface, by doing this, to fix the interface location always at the unit node. In other words, instead of stay in the unit, the interface location would always be on the outline or node of the unit, and so the boundary conditions would be added on the contour line. Therefore, the equation of both dry and frozen layers can be solved together with the combination of interface boundary conditions.
4. FiniteElement Formulations
Variational equation within the finite equation defines the formulation (2.15) and (2.18) as in which represents the finite element weight equation, is the sum of the computational domain ’s boundary, while and are the direction cosine of . Boundary term in (4.1)–(4.3) can be defined as follows:
water vapor flow
heat flow:
the total flow:
5. Results and Discussion of the Frozen Model
Figure 1 is an illustration of a sided schematic lyophilized. At the beginning of calculation, the initial dry layer thickness needs to be determined, and the equation would be unsolved when the freeze starts and the thickness of dried layer is zero. Similarly, it is required to determine the residual value of the frozen layer when the frozen layer thickness trends to be zero [19]. As the test results tell, the initial thickness of frozen layer would be m, and for residual layer thickness, the value should be m as shown in Table 1.

5.1. The Relationship between Lyophilized Chamber Pressure and Drying Time
In the process of freeze the cornea, radiation heat is the dominating way of heating. During the radiation heating, sublimation starts at the frozen material surface, which gradually forms an interface between the dried layer and frozen layer (as shown in Figure 1). The heat passes through the porous dried layer by thermal conductivity and spreads to the sublimation interface, adsorbed by the ice sublimation process simultaneously. The vapor emerged from the diffusion spread along the opposite direction of heat from the sublimation interface to the dry layer. Also, the sublimation interface moves inwards gradually until the frozen water disappears and the sublimation come to an end. So, the moving rate of the interface could stand for the lyophilized rate.
The speed of the freezedry process depends on the sublimation of ice and the diffusion rate of vapor, the former indicator is also determined by the intensity of heat transfer to the sublimation interface, hence, the drying process is controlled by tow mechanisms. Filled with vapor and small amount of air, the gas thermal conductivity rate inside the dried layer arises with the pressure increase. Therefore, when the pressure rises in the freezedry chamber, the effective thermal conductivity of the dried layer would arise and provide heat to the sublimation interface which accelerates the process. The driving force of vapor is the differential pressure of the sublimation and dried layer. The vapor pressure on the sublimation interface can be assumed equal to the saturation pressure under the interface temperature. When the temperature of the lyophilized chamber arises, the partial pressure of the dried layer increases which slows down the vapor diffusion rate control by the dried layer differential pressure of mass transfer. Clearly, the pressure of lyophilized chamber impact oppositely to the ice crystal simulation rate and water vapor diffusion rate, that is, to double impact the lyophilize process both boost and retard the process. Apparently, there should be a certain pressure that optimizes the freezedrying rate [22, 23]. During the cornea lyophilized process, there also exists an optimum value for the chamber, which can both ensure the endothelial cell survival chance and taking into account the lyophilized rate.
Figure 2 shows the lyophilized cornea freeze time under the condition of the pressure 20 Pa, 50 Pa, 80 Pa, 110 Pa. As can be concluded from the figure, the time for freeze dry the cornea basically equals to the pressure when it is below 50 Pa, then as the pressure increases, the time needed increases accordingly. The simulation results and the experimental test afterwards conclude that the chamber pressure should be over 50 Pa if more than 80% of the survival rate is required.
5.2. The Relationship between Temperature of Sublimation Interface and Time of Drying
In the process of freezedrying, as the ice is sublimating, the interface between the porous dried layer and the frozen layer will be continuously moving backward, inducing the increase of water vapor diffusion resistance at the sublimation interface and the rise of interface temperature [24–27], as shown in Figure 3. When the temperature of condenser’s surface is constant, the interface temperature would be the main parameter to determine water vapor diffusion intensity. In previous studies, the interface temperature was assumed to be a constant value [28, 29], some experts believe that the assumption will decrease the simulation analysis precision, and they assume the sublimation interface temperature in the process of freezedrying is gradually rising. They replace the constant interface temperature in the previous studies with the linear expression between the sublimation interface temperature and the location, thereby improving the mass transfer model in freezedrying process. Figure 3 shows that when the sublimation interface of freezedried material moves 30 cm, its temperature just increases by 6°C, and corneal thickness is around 0.6 mm, so in this simulation, it is viable to assume the interface temperature is constant.
The temperature of sublimation interface, the temperature of condenser surface, and the pressure of freezedrying chamber are correlated. If the temperature of sublimation interface is lower, the sublimation interface saturation pressure is lower accordingly, which requires the lower freezedrying chamber pressure and lower condenser surface temperature. The relationship among them indicates that the saturation pressure of sublimation interface > the pressure of freezedrying chamber > the saturation pressure of condenser surface. During the stages of a freezedrying process, when the condenser surface temperature is −40°C, it affects little on shortening the time of freezedrying. When the condenser surface temperature declines from −40°C to −100°C, the time of freezedrying reduces just by 4%. The influence tends to be similar to the results of Millman’s study on skim milk freezedrying [30]. Too low temperature of the condenser surface does not greatly improve the differential pressure of water vapor diffusion, which is determined by the exponential function between the saturation pressure and temperature. Instead, if the sublimation interface temperature would be increased dramatically, which increases the differential pressure of water vapor diffusion (the saturated pressure is 260 Pa, when it is −10°C), the time of freezing can be reduced distinctly.
During the process of corneal freezedrying, sublimation interface temperature cannot be in −30°C to −60°C, within which biological cells are at risk. If the temperature of the sublimation interface is below −60°C, it will not only reduce the temperature of the condenser surface, but also can make the time of freezedrying much longer causing the increase of the damaged cornea chance. The experiment indicates that the corneal endothelial survival chance can achieve the standard value if the sublimation temperature is fixed around −10°C.
5.3. The Relationship between Differential Surface Temperature and the Time of Drying
Figure 4 shows the computational results of doublesided freezedried model of Figure 1. In Figure 4, the pressure in the freezedrying chamber is 50 Pa, and the surface temperatures are −10°C, 0°C, and 10°C, respectively. Three curves are basic coincident, confirming that the variation of surface temperature is from −10°C to 10°C, it has little a influence on the corneal freezedrying process.
5.4. Simulative Calculation Performed when the Pressure of FreezeDrying Chamber Is 50 Pa and Corneal Surface Temperature Is 10°C
(1)The computational results illustrated in Figure 5 include twosided freezedried model simulation and the change of sublimation interface with the freezedrying process. As can be seen in the figure, in the initial stage of corneal freezedrying, the position of sublimation interface moves quite smoothly. And at the end of drying, the slope of curve increases, which illustrates that the speed of the mobile sublimation interface increases. As the positive relationship between interface mobile rate and freezedried rate, the freezedried rate can be observed from the interface moving speed. Time of doubleside freezedrying was 170 mins.(2)Figure 6 shows the results of the unit applying temperature and pressure load.
(a)
(b)
(c)
6. Conclusions
(1)Mathematical model describing heat and mass transfer during vacuum freezedrying of cornea is established through theory analysis of corneal freezedrying. The analogy computation for the freezedrying of cornea was made by using the finiteelement computational software. When the pressure of the freezedrying box is around 50 Pa and temperature is around −10°C, Time of doubleside drying was 170 mins.(2)In this paper, a movinggrid finiteelement method is used to track the parameters node continuously to increase the experiment accuracy, also, the results are evident with clear physical significance.
Nomenclature
:  Concentration of the water in the adsorption phase (or solid phase), the number of moles (or mass) per unit volume of frozen phrase (kg water/kg solid) 
:  Specific heat of the component (kJ/kg·K) 
:  Concentration of the component I in gas phase, the number of moles (or mass) per space unit volume of frozen phase 
:  The flow rate of the component (kg/m s) 
:  The flow rate of water vapor in the already dried layer (kg/m s) 
:  The flow of permanent gas in the already dried layer(kg/m s) 
:  Full flow in the already dried layer (kg/m s) 
:  Coefficient of thermal conductivity (kW/m·K) 
:  Coefficient of internal mass transfer with analytical function () 
:  Diffusion rate constant of the main body ( 
:  Selfdiffusion rate constant ( 
:  Diffusion rate constant of the main body ( 
:  Selfdiffusion rate constant ( 
:  Constant only related to the structure of the porous media, which produce relative D’Arcy air permeability 
:  Constant only related to the structure of the porous media, which can produce relative Knudsen air permeability 
:  Constant only related to the structure of the porous media, which is the ratio of the main body diffusion rate to free gas diffusion rate, no dimension 
:  Knudsen diffusion coefficient, where is molecular weight of water 
:  Knudsen diffusion coefficient, where is molecular weight of permanent gas 
:  The average Knudsen diffusion coefficient of binary gas mixture, () 
Diffusion coefficient of free gas in binary gas mixture with water vapor and permanent gas  
:  Gas constant (kJ/mole·K) 
:  Molecular weight (kg/kg mole) 
:  Total pressure in the already dried layer (Pa) 
:  Partial vapor pressure (Pa) 
:  Initial partial vapor pressure (Pa) 
:  Partial pressure of permanent gas (Pa) 
:  Initial partial pressure of permanent gas (Pa) 
:  Rate of heat flow (kW/m) 
:  Radius (m) 
:  Time (s) 
:  Temperature (K) 
:  Initial temperature (K) 
:  Outside temperature (K) 
Interface temperature (K)  
:  Interface velocity (m/s) 
:  Space coordinates through the thickness direction 
:  Space coordinates through the warp direction 
:  The number of moles in the component in gas phase 
:  The viscosity of binary gas mixture with water vapor and permanent gas in porous already dried layer (kg/m·s) 
The vaporization heat of adsorbed water (kJ/kg)  
:  Latent heat of sublimation of ice (kJ/kg). 
:  The volume of space in each unit volume of material; 
:  Density, kg/m. 
:  Components 
In:  Permanent gas 
:  Water 
:  Effective value 
I:  Dried area 
II:  Freezing area 
:  Quadrature component 
:  direction component 
:  direction component. 
References
 E.N. Dragoi, S. Curteanu, and D. Fissore, “Freezedrying modeling and monitoring using a new neuroevolutive technique,” Chemical Engineering Science, vol. 72, pp. 195–204, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. A. Barresi, R. Pisano, V. Rasetto, D. Fissore, and D. L. Marchisio, “Modelbased monitoring and control of industrial freezedrying processes: effect of batch nonuniformity,” Drying Technology, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 577–590, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. J. Pikal, S. Cardon, C. Bhugra et al., “The nonsteady state modeling of freeze drying: inprocess product temperature and moisture content mapping and pharmaceutical product quality applications,” Pharmaceutical Development and Technology, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 17–32, 2005. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. Pisano, D. Fissore, S. A. Velardi, and A. A. Barresi, “Inline optimization and control of an industrial freezedrying process for pharmaceuticals,” Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 99, no. 11, pp. 4691–4709, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 N. Harnkarnsujarit, S. Charoenrein, and Y. H. Roos, “Microstructure formation of maltodextrin and sugar matrices in freezedried systems,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 734–742, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Terta, G. Blekas, and A. Paraskevopoulou, “Retention of selected aroma compounds by polysaccharide solutions: a thermodynamic and kinetic approach,” Food Hydrocolloids, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 863–871, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Yongan, “Highefficiency low temperature drying equipment with heat hump,” Journal of Shenyang Architectural and Civil Engineering Institute, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 432–435, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
 J. F. Nastaj and K. Witkiewicz, “Mathematical modeling of the primary and secondary vacuum freeze drying of random solids at microwave heating,” International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 52, no. 2122, pp. 4796–4806, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  Zentralblatt MATH
 J. F. Nastaj, K. Witkiewicz, and B. Wilczyńska, “Experimental and simulation studies of primary vacuum freezedrying process of random solids at microwave heating,” International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 430–438, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. I. Liapis and R. J. Litchfield, “Optimal control of a freeze dryerI: theoretical development and quasi steady state analysis,” Chemical Engineering Science, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 975–981, 1979. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 K. Georgiev, N. Kosturski, S. Margenov, and J. Starý, “On adaptive time stepping for largescale parabolic problems: computer simulation of heat and mass transfer in vacuum freezedrying,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 226, no. 2, pp. 268–274, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  Zentralblatt MATH
 A. I. Liapis and R. J. Litchfield, “Numerical solution of moving boundary transport problems in finite media by orthogonal collocation,” Computers and Chemical Engineering, vol. 3, no. 1–4, pp. 615–621, 1979. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. M. Tang, A. I. Liapis, and J. M. Marchello, “A multidimensional model describing the lyophilization of a pharmaceutical product in a vial,” in Proceedings of the 5th International Drying Symposium, A. S. Mujumdar, Ed., pp. 57–64, Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, New York, NY, USA, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
 M. J. Millman, A. I. Liapis, and J. M. Marchello, “An analysis of the lyophilization process using a sorptionsublimation model and various operation policies,” AIChE Journal, vol. 31, no. 10, pp. 1594–1604, 1985. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 T. D. Tsvetkov and N. L. Vulchanov, “Toward the mathematical modeling of heat and mass transfer in vacuum freezedrying. I. Thermodynamic analysis of heat and masstransfer processes in capillary porous materials undergoing freezedrying,” Cryobiology, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 155–165, 1981. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. B. Evans, G. M. Watson, and E. A. Mason, “Gaseous diffusion in porous media. II. Effect of pressure gradients,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 1894–1902, 1962. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Hottot, S. Vessot, and J. Andrieu, “Freeze drying of pharmaceuticals in vials: influence of freezing protocol and sample configuration on ice morphology and freezedried cake texture,” Chemical Engineering and Processing, vol. 46, no. 7, pp. 666–674, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. Agnieszka and L. Andrzej, “Rehydration and sorption properties of osmotically pretreated freezedried strawberries,” Journal of Food Engineering, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 267–274, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Z. Qinglian and L. Jianbo, “Contours and isosurfaces drawing for the finite element method,” Journal of Shenyang Architectural and Civil Engineering University, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 220–224, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
 J. Babić, M. J. Cantalejo, and C. Arroqui, “The effects of freezedrying process parameters on Broiler chicken breast meat,” Food Science and Technology, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 1325–1334, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 K. Georgiev, N. Kosturski, S. Margenov, and J. Starý, “On adaptive time stepping for largescale parabolic problems: computer simulation of heat and mass transfer in vacuum freezedrying,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 226, no. 2, pp. 268–274, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  Zentralblatt MATH
 T. Branger, C. Bobin, M.G. Iroulart et al., “Comparative study of two drying techniques used in radioactive source preparation: freezedrying and evaporation using hot dry nitrogen jets,” Applied Radiation and Isotopes, vol. 66, no. 67, pp. 685–690, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. Thuwapanichayanan, S. Prachayawarakorn, J. Kunwisawa, and S. Soponronnarit, “Determination of effective moisture diffusivity and assessment of quality attributes of banana slices during drying,” Food Science and Technology, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 1502–1510, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. A. Velardi and A. A. Barresi, “Development of simplified models for the freezedrying process and investigation of the optimal operating conditions,” Chemical Engineering Research and Design, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 9–22, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Xiang, J. M. Hey, V. Liedtke, and D. Q. Wang, “Investigation of freezedrying sublimation rates using a freezedrying microbalance technique,” International Journal of Pharmaceutics, vol. 279, no. 12, pp. 95–105, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. C. Olguín, V. O. Salvadori, R. H. Mascheroni, and D. A. Tarzia, “An analytical solution for the coupled heat and mass transfer during the freezing of highwater content materials,” International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 51, no. 1718, pp. 4379–4391, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  Zentralblatt MATH
 W. Y. Kuu, J. McShane, and J. Wong, “Determination of mass transfer coefficients during freeze drying using modeling and parameter estimation techniques,” International Journal of Pharmaceutics, vol. 124, no. 2, pp. 241–252, 1995. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Farid and R. Kizilel, “A new approach to the analysis of heat and mass transfer in drying and frying of food products,” Chemical Engineering and Processing, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 217–223, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. Rene, E. Wolff, and F. Rodolphe, “Vacuum freezedrying of a liquid in a vial: determination of heat and masstransfer coefficients and optimisation of operating pressure,” Chemical Engineering and Processing, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 245–251, 1993. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. J. Millman, A. I. Liapis, and J. M. Marchello, “Guidelines for the desirable operation of batch freeze dryers during the removed of free water,” Journal of Food Technology, vol. 19, pp. 725–738, 1984. View at: Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 Zou Huifen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.