Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2013, Article ID 138546, 13 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/138546
Research Article

Constructing Taipei City Sports Centre Performance Evaluation Model with Fuzzy MCDM Approach Based on Views of Managers

1Department of Business Administration, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, No. 43, Section 4, Keelung Road, Taipei 106, Taiwan
2Graduate Institute Sport Coaching Science, Chinese Culture University, No. 55, Hwa-Kung Road, Taipei 111, Taiwan

Received 17 September 2013; Revised 23 November 2013; Accepted 24 November 2013

Academic Editor: Kim-Hua Tan

Copyright © 2013 Chen-Yang Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. C.-R. Wu, C.-T. Lin, and P.-H. Tsai, “Evaluating business performance of wealth management banks,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 207, no. 2, pp. 971–979, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. C.-R. Wu, C.-T. Lin, and P.-H. Tsai, “Financial service sector performance measurement model: AHP sensitivity analysis and balanced scorecard approach,” The Service Industries Journal, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 695–711, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. H.-Y. Wu, Y.-K. Lin, and C.-H. Chang, “Performance evaluation of extension education centers in universities based on the balanced scorecard,” Evaluation and Program Planning, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 37–50, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. G. Bruno, E. Esposito, A. Genovese, and R. Passaro, “AHP-based approaches for supplier evaluation: problems and perspectives,” Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, vol. 18, pp. 159–172, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. T. Chen and K.-S. Sun, “Exploring the strategy to improve senior citizens' participations on recreational sports,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 26, pp. 86–92, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. Salimi, M. Soltanhosseini, D. Padash, and E. Khalili, “Prioritization of the factors effecting privatization in sport clubs: with AHP & TOPSIS methods-emphasis in football,” International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 2, pp. 102–114, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  7. A. V. Horenbeek and L. Pintelon, “Development of a maintenance performance measurement framework-using the analytic network process (ANP) for maintenance performance indicator selection,” Omega, vol. 42, pp. 33–46, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. T. L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 1980. View at MathSciNet
  9. C.-R. Wu, C.-T. Lin, and P.-H. Tsai, “Analysing alternatives in financial services for wealth management banks: the analytic network process and the balanced scorecard approach,” IMA Journal Management Mathematics, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 303–321, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  10. S. H. Zolfani, I. S. Chen, N. Rezaeiniya, and J. Tamošaitienė, “A hybrid MCDM model encompassing AHP and COPRAS-G methods for selecting company supplier in Iran,” Technological and Economic Development of Economy, vol. 18, pp. 529–543, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. H.-P. Fu, K.-K. Chu, P. Chao, H.-H. Lee, and Y.-C. Liao, “Using fuzzy AHP and VIKOR for benchmarking analysis in the hotel industry,” The Service Industries Journal, vol. 31, no. 14, pp. 2373–2389, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. L. Z. Lin, L. C. Huang, and H. R. Yeh, “Fuzzy group decision-making for service innovations in quality function deployment,” Group Decision and Negotiation, vol. 21, pp. 495–517, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. C. Y. Lin and Y. C. Shiue, “An application of AHP and sensitivity analysis for measuring the best strategy of reverse logistics: a case study of photovoltaic industry chain,” Journal of Testing and Evaluation, vol. 41, no. 3, 12 pages, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  14. A. Baležentisb, T. Baležentisb, and A. Misiunas, “Anintegrated assessment of Lithuanian economic sectors based on financial ratios and fuzzy MCDM methods,” Technological and Economic Development of Economy, vol. 18, pp. 34–53, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. J.-K. Chen, “The assessment of vision re-creation indices for the automotive industry in Taiwan: a hybrid fuzzy model approach,” Measurement, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 909–917, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. N. Yalcin, A. Bayrakdaroglu, and C. Kahraman, “Application of fuzzy multi-criteria decision making methods for financial performance evaluation of Turkish manufacturing industries,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 350–364, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. Z. Li, W. K. Wong, and C. K. Kwong, “An integrated model of material supplier selection and order allocation using fuzzy extended AHP and multiobjective programming,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2013, Article ID 363718, 14 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. A. Gabus and E. Fontela, World Problems, an Invitation to Further Thought within the Framework of DEMATEL, Battelle Geneva Research Centre, Geneva, Switzerland, 1972.
  19. H.-Y. Wu, J.-K. Chen, I.-S. Chen, and H.-H. Zhuo, “Ranking universities based on performance evaluation by a hybrid MCDM model,” Measurement, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 856–880, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. G. Caliskan, “Criteria in sport management,” International Business Management, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 22–31, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. H. D. Horch, “The German sport club and the Japanese firm,” European Journal for Sport Management, vol. 3, pp. 21–34, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  22. H. D. Horch, “Self-destroying processes of sport clubs in Germany,” European Journal for Sport Management, vol. 5, pp. 46–58, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  23. S. Lee and P. Walsh, “SWOT and AHP hybrid model for sport marketing outsourcing using a case of intercollegiate sport,” Sport Management Review, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 361–369, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. S. Lee and S. D. Ross, “Sport sponsorship decision making in a global market: an approach of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP),” Sport, Business and Management, vol. 2, pp. 156–168, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. Z. Sinuany-Stern, “Ranking of sports teams via the AHP,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 39, no. 7, pp. 661–667, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. M. R. Lanoue and J. J. Revetta Jr., “An analytic hierarchy approach to major league baseball offensive performance ratings,” Mathematical and Computer Modelling, vol. 17, no. 4-5, pp. 195–209, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. M. Gou, “Modeling for athletic sports strategies based on fuzzy system,” Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing, vol. 62, pp. 447–455, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  28. S.-K. Liao and K.-L. Chang, “Select televised sportscasters for olympic games by analytic network process,” Management Decision, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 14–23, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. T. H. Chen, “Using hybrid MCDM model for enhancing the participation of teacher in recreational sports,” Journal of Decision Systems, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 33–49, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. T. Kaya and C. Kahraman, “Multicriteria renewable energy planning using an integrated fuzzy VIKOR & AHP methodology: the case of Istanbul,” Energy, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 2517–2527, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. H. C. Rajput, A. S. Milani, and A. Labun, “Including time dependency and ANOVA in decision-making using the revised fuzzy AHP: a case study on wafer fabrication process selection,” Applied Soft Computing Journal, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 5099–5109, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. C.-H. Hsu, F.-K. Wang, and G.-H. Tzeng, “The best vendor selection for conducting the recycled material based on a hybrid MCDM model combining DANP with VIKOR,” Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 66, pp. 95–111, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. J. Rezaei and R. Ortt, “Multi-criteria supplier segmentation using a fuzzy preference relations based AHP,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 225, pp. 75–84, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. G.-H. Tzeng, C.-H. Chiang, and C.-W. Li, “Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: a novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 1028–1044, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy sets,” Information and Computation, vol. 8, pp. 338–353, 1965. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  36. H. J. Zimmermann, Fuzzy Set Theory and Its Applications, Kluwer Academic, Boston, Mass, USA, 2nd edition, 1991.
  37. C.-L. Yang, S.-P. Chuang, and R.-H. Huang, “Manufacturing evaluation system based on AHP/ANP approach for wafer fabricating industry,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 11369–11377, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. A. Görener, K. Toker, and K. Uluçay, “Application of combined SWOT and AHP: a case study for a manufacturing firm,” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 58, pp. 1525–1534, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  39. L.-A. Vidal, F. Marle, and J.-C. Bocquet, “Using a delphi process and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to evaluate the complexity of projects,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 5388–5405, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. N. Manteghi and M. J. H. Jahromi, “Propose a model to choose best project by AHP in distributed generation,” Procedia Technology, vol. 1, pp. 481–484, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  41. D. Y. Chang, “Extent analysis and synthetic decision,” Optimization Techniques and Applications, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 352, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  42. D.-Y. Chang, “Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 649–655, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  43. T. L. Saaty, Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process, RWS Publication, Pittsburgh, Pa, USA, 1996.
  44. M. M. Fouladgar, A. Yazdani-Chamzini, E. K. Zavadskas, and S. H. Haji Moini, “A new hybrid model for evaluating the working strategies: case study of construction company,” Technological and Economic Development of Economy, vol. 18, pp. 164–188, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar