Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 160610, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/160610
Research Article

Some Induced Correlated Aggregating Operators with Interval Grey Uncertain Linguistic Information and Their Application to Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making

School of Economic and Management, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China

Received 3 November 2012; Accepted 30 December 2012

Academic Editor: Youqing Wang

Copyright © 2013 Zu-Jun Ma et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy sets,” Information and Control, vol. 8, pp. 338–353, 1965. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  2. D. Ju-Long, “Control problems of grey systems,” Systems & Control Letters, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 288–294, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  3. J. Kacprzyk, “Group decision making with a fuzzy linguistic majority,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 105–118, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  4. P. Liu and F. Jin, “The multi-attribute group decision making method based on the interval grey linguistic variables,” African Journal of Business Management, vol. 4, no. 17, pp. 3708–3715, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. P. D. Liu and X. Zhang, “Multi-attribute group decision making method based on interval grey linguistic variables weighted geometric aggregation operator,” Control and Decision, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 743–747, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  6. Z. Su, G. Xia, M. Chen, and L. Wang, “Induced generalized intuitionistic fuzzy OWA operator for multi-attribute group decision making,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 1902–1910, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. Z. Yue, “A method for group decision-making based on determining weights of decision makers using TOPSIS,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 1926–1936, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  8. G. W. Wei, “FIOWHM operator and its application to multiple attribute group decision making,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 2984–2989, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. G. Wei, X. Zhao, R. Lin, and H. Wang, “Generalized triangular fuzzy correlated averaging operator and their application to multiple attribute decision making,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 2975–2982, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  10. Z. Xu, “Uncertain linguistic aggregation operators based approach to multiple attribute group decision making under uncertain linguistic environment,” Information Sciences, vol. 168, no. 1–4, pp. 171–184, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. Z. Xu, “A note on linguistic hybrid arithmetic averaging operator in multiple attribute group decision making with linguistic information,” Group Decision and Negotiation, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 593–604, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. Z. Xu, “An approach based on the uncertain LOWG and induced uncertain LOWG operators to group decision making with uncertain multiplicative linguistic preference relations,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 488–499, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. M. Merigó and G. Wei, “Probabilistic aggregation operators and their application in uncertain multi-person decision-making,” Technological and Economic Development of Economy, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 335–351, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. D. W. Chen, Grey Fuzzy Set Introduction, Heilongjiang Science and Technology Press, Harbin, China, 1994.
  15. G. Z. Bu and Y. W. Zhang, “Grey fuzzy comprehensive evaluation based on the theory of grey fuzzy relation,” Systems Engineering, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 141–144, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  16. N. Jin and S. C. Lou, “Study on multi-attribute decision making model based on the theory of grey fuzzy relation,” Intelligence Command Control and Simulation Techniques, vol. 7, pp. 44–47, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  17. N. Jin and S. Lou, “A grey fuzzy multi-attribute decision making method,” Fire Control & Command Control, vol. 4, pp. 26–28, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  18. L. Dang and L. Sifeng, “Analytic method to a kind of grey fuzzy decision making based on entropy,” Engineering Science, vol. 10, pp. 48–51, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  19. K. Meng, Y. Li, C. Wang, and W. Yang, “Interval-value grey fuzzy comprehensive evaluation based on the preference of the risk and its application,” Fire Control and Command Control, vol. 2007, no. 4, pp. 109–111, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  20. E. Cables, M. S. García-Cascales, and M. T. Lamata, “The LTOPSIS: an alternative to TOPSIS decision-making approach for linguistic variables,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 2119–2126, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  21. M. Delgado, J. L. Verdegay, and M. A. Vila, “Linguistic decision-making models,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 479–492, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  22. F. Herrera, E. Herrera-Viedma, and J. L. Verdegay, “Direct approach processes in group decision making using linguistic OWA operators,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 175–190, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  23. F. Herrera and E. Herrera-Viedma, “Linguistic decision analysis: steps for solving decision problems under linguistic information,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 115, no. 1, pp. 67–82, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  24. J. M. Merigó, M. Casanovas, and L. Martínez, “Linguistic aggregation operators for linguistic decision making based on the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence,” International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 287–301, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  25. Z. Xu, “Choquet integrals of weighted intuitionistic fuzzy information,” Information Sciences, vol. 180, no. 5, pp. 726–736, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  26. S.-M. Zhou, F. Chiclana, R. I. John, and J. M. Garibaldi, “Type-1 OWA operators for aggregating uncertain information with uncertain weights induced by type-2 linguistic quantifiers,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 159, no. 24, pp. 3281–3296, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  27. Y. H. Chen, T. C. Wang, and C. Y. Wu, “Multi-criteria decision making with fuzzy linguistic preference relations,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 1322–1330, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  28. N. Zhang and G. W. Wei, “Method for aggregating correlated interval grey linguistic variables and its application to decision making,” Technological and Economic Development of Economy, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 60–77, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  29. G. Choquet, “Theory of capacities,” Annales de l'Institut Fourier, vol. 5, pp. 131–295, 1953. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  30. R. R. Yager, “Induced aggregation operators,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 137, no. 1, pp. 59–69, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  31. R. Yager, “OWA aggregation over a continuous interval argument with applications to decision making,” IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics B, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 1952–1963, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  32. C. Tan and X. Chen, “Induced Choquet ordered averaging operator and its application to group decision making,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 59–82, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. G. W. Wei and X. Zhao, “Some induced correlated aggregating operators with intuitionistic fuzzy information and their application to multiple attribute group decision making,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 2026–2034, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  34. L. A. Zadeh, “The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning—I,” Information Sciences, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 199–249, 1975. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  35. Z. Xu, “Deviation measures of linguistic preference relations in group decision making,” Omega, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 249–254, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. Z. Xu, “An interactive approach to multiple attribute group decision making with multigranular uncertain linguistic information,” Group Decision and Negotiation, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 119–145, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. R. R. Yager, “Choquet aggregation using order inducing variables,” International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 69–88, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  38. Z. Y. Wang and G. J. Klir, Fuzzy Measure Theory, Plenum Publishing, New York, NY, USA, 1992. View at MathSciNet