Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 231826, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/231826
Research Article

Research on Effectiveness Modeling of the Online Chat Group

1School of Information & Electronic Engineering, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou, 310018, China
2Information Management Center, Training Department, Information Engineering University, Zhengzhou, 450002, China

Received 25 May 2013; Revised 9 September 2013; Accepted 10 September 2013

Academic Editor: Panos Liatsis

Copyright © 2013 Hua-Fei Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. B. Gonçalves, N. Perra, and A. Vespignani, “Modeling users' activity on Twitter networks: validation of Dunbar's number,” http://arxiv.org/pdf/1105.5170v2.pdf.
  2. R. Reagans and E. W. Zuckerman, “Networks, diversity, and productivity: the social capital of corporate R&D teams,” Organization Science, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 502–517, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. H. Oh, G. Labianca, and M.-H. Chung, “A multilevel model of group social capital,” Academy of Management Review, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 569–582, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. W. Dong, B. Lepri, T. Kim, F. Pianesi, and A. P. Pentland, “Modeling conversational dynamics and performance in a social dilemma task,” in Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Communications, Control and Signal Processing, pp. 1–4, Rome, Italy, 2012.
  5. C. Budak and R. Agrawal, “On participation in group chats on twitter,” in Proceedings of the International World Wide Web Conference, Rio, Brazil, 2013.
  6. P. J. Bateman, P. H. Gray, and B. S. Butler, “Community commitment: how affect, obligation, and necessity drive online behaviors,” in Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Intelligent Systems, p. 63, Madison, Wis, USA, 2006.
  7. P. B. Brandtzæg and J. Heim, “User loyalty and online communities: why members of online communities are not faithful,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Intelligent Technologies for Interactive Entertainment, Cancun, Mexico, 2008.
  8. J. Arguello, B. Butler, E. Joyce, R. Kraut, K. S. Ling, and X. Wang, “Talk to me: foundations for successful individual-group interactions in online communities,” in Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Human Interaction, pp. 959–968, Montreal, Canada, April 2006. View at Scopus
  9. L. Backstrom, R. Kumar, C. Marlow, J. Novak, and A. Tomkins, “Preferential behavior in online groups,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM '08), pp. 117–128, Stanford, Calif, USA, February 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. D. A. Huffaker, C. Teng, P. S. Matthew, L. Gong, and L. A. Adamic, “The impact of group attributes on communication activity and shared language in online communities,” First Monday, vol. 16, no. 4, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. P. Mutton, “Inferring and visualizing social networks on internet relay chat,” in Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Information Visualisation (IV '04), pp. 35–43, London, UK, July 2004. View at Scopus
  12. E. Acar, S. A. C. ̧amtepe, M. S. Krishnamoorthy, and B. Yener, “Modeling and multiway analysis of chatroom tensors,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics, pp. 256–268, Atlanta, Ga, USA, 2005.
  13. P. Bródka, T. Filipowski, and P. Kazienko, “An introduction to community detection in multi-layered social network,” Information Systems, E-Learning, and Knowledge Management Research, vol. 278, pp. 185–190, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. N. W. van Dyke, H. Lieberman, and P. Maes, “Butterfly: a conversation-finding agent for Internet relay chat,” in Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (UIST '99), pp. 39–41, Los Angeles, Calif, USA, November 1998. View at Scopus
  15. J. Bengel, S. Gauch, E. Mittur, and R. Vijayaraghavan, “ChatTrack: chat room topic detection using text classification,” in Proceedings of the 2nd Symposium on Intelligence and Security Informatics, pp. 266–277, Tucson, Ariz, USA, 2004.
  16. X. Guo, Y. Xiang, Q. Chen, Z. Huang, and Y. Hao, “LDA-based online topic detection using tensor factorization,” Journal of Information Science, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 1–11, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  17. S. Liu and H. Chang, “A topic detection and tracking system with TF-Density,” Recent Progress in Data Engineering and Internet Technology, pp. 115–120, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  18. S. Karlin and J. Mcgregor, “Ehrenfest urn models,” Journal of Applied Probability, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 352–376, 1965. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. O. Krat and M. Schaefer, “Mean passage times for tridiagonal transition matrices and a two-parameter Ehrenfest urn model,” Journal of Applied Probability, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 964–970, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar