Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2013, Article ID 248537, 8 pages
Research Article

The Impact of the Subsidy Policy on Total Factor Productivity: An Empirical Analysis of China's Cotton Production

1College of Economics and Management, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510642, China
2Department of Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Science, University of Agder, 4898 Grimstad, Norway

Received 7 December 2012; Accepted 12 January 2013

Academic Editor: Xiaohang Yue

Copyright © 2013 Yanwen Tan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. K. Giannakas, R. Schoney, and V. Tzouvelekas, “Technical efficiency, technological change and output growth of wheat farms in Saskatchewan,” Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 135–152, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. A. Rezitis, K. Tsiboukas, and S. Tsoukalas, “Investigation of factors influencing the technical efficiency of agricultural producers participating in farm credit programs: the case of Greece,” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 529–541, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  3. H. Guyomard, L. Latruffe, and C. Le Mouel, “Technical efficiency, technical progress and productivity change in French agriculture: Do subsidies and farms' size matter?” in Proceedings of the 96th European Association of Agricultural Economists Seminar (EAAE '06), Tänikon, Switzerland, January 2006.
  4. M. Sabir and Q. M. Ahmed, “Economic reforms and total factor productivity growth in Pakistan: an empirical analysis,” Business Review, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 53–68, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  5. O. Nivievskyi, “Price support, efficiency and technology change of Ukrainian dairy farms: spatial dependence in the components of productivity growth,” in Proceedings of the International Association of Agricultural Economists Conference, Beijing, China, August 2009.
  6. L. Latruffe, H. Guyomard, and C. Le Mouel, “The role of public subsidies on farms' managerial efficiency: an application of a five-stage approach to France,” Working Paper SMART-LERECO 09-05, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  7. S. Mary, “Assessing the Impacts of Pillar 1 and 2 Subsidies on TFP in French Crop Farms,” Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 133–144, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. A. Kazukauskas and C. Newman, “CAP reform and its impact on structural change and productivity growth: a cross country analysis,” in Proceedings of the 114th European Association of Agricultural Economists Seminar on Structural Change in Agriculture (EAAE '10), Berlin, Germany, April 2010.
  9. M. Rizov, J. Pokrivcak, and P. Ciaian, “CAP subsidies and productivity of the EU farms,” in Proceedings of the International Association of Agricultural Economists (IAAE) Triennial Conference, Foz do Iguaçu, Brazil, August 2012.
  10. B. Chen and Y. Wang, “Investigation and analysis on Grain Subsidy reform in Hubei province,” Economic Problems, vol. 3, pp. 50–52, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  11. R. Zhao and Q. Meng, “Analysis on the direct subsidy policy effect on Grain production-a case of Shandong province,” Agriculture Economic, vol. 5, pp. 20–21, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  12. J. Wang and H. Xiao, “Effect analysis on the policy of improved variety subsidy, agricultural machine subsidy, and reduction or remission of agricultural Taxes in China,” Issues in Agricultural Economy, vol. 2, pp. 24–28, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  13. Z. Cao and T. Zhang, “Efficient analysis on the allowance for purchasing agricultural machinery and Peasant's increased income,” Journal of Agricultural Mechanization Research, vol. 12, pp. 67–69, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  14. L. Lu, “The prospective performance analysis of agriculture subsidy policy-a survey of farmer families in Shengchi County,” Reformation and Strategy, vol. 8, pp. 68–71, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  15. S. Fang and W. Wang, “Study on agricultural subsidy policy in the context of soaring cost,” Management World, vol. 9, pp. 91–108, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  16. L. Wu and W. Lu, “Simulation study on the performance of Grain subsidy policies base on a household model,” Journal of China Agricultural University, vol. 5, pp. 171–178, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  17. L. Ding, X. Wang, Y. Tan, and C. Kang, “The optimal subsidy of cotton production in China-empirical analysis based on principal component regression method,” Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University, vol. 6, pp. 5–9, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  18. M. V. P. de Souza, M. Diallo, R. C. Souza, and T. K. N. Baidya, “The cost efficiency of the brazilian electricity distribution utilities: a comparison of bayesian SFA and DEA models,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2010, Article ID 593059, 20 pages, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. S. Malmquist, “Index numbers and indifference surfaces,” Trabajos de Estadistica, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 209–242, 1953. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  20. D. Caves, L. Christensen, and W. Diewert, “The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output, and productivity,” Econometrica, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 1393–1414, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. R. Fare, S. Grosskopf, M. Norris, and Zhongyang Zhang, “Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries,” American Economic Review, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 66–83, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. R. W. Shepherd, Theory of Cost and Production Functions, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 1970. View at MathSciNet