Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2013, Article ID 268063, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/268063
Research Article

Feature Selection in Decision Systems: A Mean-Variance Approach

1School of Informatics, Linyi University, Linyi 276005, China
2Key Laboratory of Child Development and Learning Science of Ministry of Education, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China
3School of Science, Linyi University, Linyi 276005, China

Received 6 April 2013; Accepted 24 April 2013

Academic Editor: Guanghui Wen

Copyright © 2013 Chengdong Yang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. Z. Pawlak, “Rough sets,” International Journal of Computer and Information Sciences, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 341–356, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  2. P. Fortemps, S. Greco, and R. Słowiński, “Multicriteria decision support using rules that represent rough-graded preference relations,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 188, no. 1, pp. 206–223, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  3. T. Deng, Y. Chen, W. Xu, and Q. Dai, “A novel approach to fuzzy rough sets based on a fuzzy covering,” Information Sciences, vol. 177, no. 11, pp. 2308–2326, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  4. W. Z. Wu, “Attribute reduction based on evidence theory in incomplete decision systems,” Information Sciences, vol. 178, no. 5, pp. 1355–1371, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  5. M. C. Lee, “Using support vector machine with a hybrid feature selection method to the stock trend prediction,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 10896–10904, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. Z. Pawlak, “Some remarks on conflict analysis,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 166, no. 3, pp. 649–654, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. H. Xiumei, F. Haiyan, and S. Kaiquan, “S-rough sets and the discovery of F-hiding knowledge,” Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 1171–1177, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. C. Wang, C. Wu, D. Chen, Q. Hu, and C. Wu, “Communicating between information systems,” Information Sciences, vol. 178, no. 16, pp. 3228–3239, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  9. D. Chen, Y. Yang, and X. Zhang, “Parameterized local reduction of decision systems,” Journal of Applied Mathematics, vol. 2012, Article ID 857590, 14 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  10. Md. M. Kabir, Md. Shahjahan, and K. Murase, “A new local search based hybrid genetic algorithm for feature selection,” Neurocomputing, vol. 74, no. 17, pp. 2914–2928, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. C. Yang, W. Zhang, J. Zou et al., “A novel uncertainty measure on rough sets: a mean-variance approach,” in Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery, pp. 900–904, 2012.
  12. L. Yu and H. Liu, “Efficiently handling feature redundancy in highdimensional data,” in Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD '03), pp. 685–690, Washington, DC, USA, August 2003.
  13. S. K. M. Wong and W. Ziarko, “On optimal decision rules in decision tables,” Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences, vol. 33, no. 11-12, pp. 693–696, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  14. F. Li and Y. Yin, “Approaches to knowledge reduction of covering decision systems based on information theory,” Information Sciences, vol. 179, no. 11, pp. 1694–1704, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  15. J. Guan and D. Bell, “Rough computational methods for information systems,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 105, pp. 77–103, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  16. Z. Geng and Q. Zhu, “Rough set-based heuristic hybrid recognizer and its application in fault diagnosis,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 2711–2718, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. Z. Pawlak, “Rough sets and fuzzy sets,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems in Information Science and Engineering, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 99–102, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  18. X. Hu and N. Cercone, “Learning in relational databases: a rough set approach,” Computational Intelligence, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 323–338, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. Q. Shen and R. Jensen, “Selecting informative features with fuzzy-rough sets and its application for complex systems monitoring,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 39, no. 7, pp. 1351–1363, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  20. Q. Hu, Z. Xie, and D. Yu, “Hybrid attribute reduction based on a novel fuzzy-rough model and information granulation,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 40, no. 12, pp. 3509–3521, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. R. Jensen and Q. Shen, “New approaches to fuzzy-rough feature selection,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 824–838, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. Q. He, C. Wu, D. Chen, and S. Zhao, “Fuzzy rough set based attribute reduction for information systems with fuzzy decisions,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 689–696, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. D. Zhang, Y. Wang, and H. Huang, “Rough neural network modeling based on fuzzy rough model and its application to texture classification,” Neurocomputing, vol. 72, no. 10–12, pp. 2433–2443, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. Q. Hu, D. Yu, J. Liu, and C. Wu, “Neighborhood rough set based heterogeneous feature subset selection,” Information Sciences, vol. 178, no. 18, pp. 3577–3594, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  25. J. Zheng and R. Yan, “Attribute reduction based on cross entropy in rough set theory,” Journal of Information & Computational Science, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 745–750, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  26. N. M. Parthaláin and Q. Shen, “Exploring the boundary region of tolerance rough sets for feature selection,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 655–667, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. X. Jia, W. Liao, Z. Tang, and L. Shang, “Minimum cost attribute reduction in decision-theoretic rough set models,” Information Sciences, vol. 219, pp. 151–167, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  28. F. Min, H. He, Y. Qian, and W. Zhu, “Test-cost-sensitive attribute reduction,” Information Sciences, vol. 181, no. 22, pp. 4928–44942, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  29. F. Wang, J. Liang, and C. Dang, “Attribute reduction for dynamic data sets,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 676–6689, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  30. J. Zhang, T. Li, D. Ruan, and D. Liu, “Rough sets based matrix approaches with dynamic attribute variation in set-valued information systems,” International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 620–635, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  31. Z. Meng and Z. Shi, “Extended rough set-based attribute reduction in inconsistent incomplete decision systems,” Information Sciences, vol. 204, pp. 44–69, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  32. W. Zhu and F. Y. Wang, “Reduction and axiomization of covering generalized rough sets,” Information Sciences, vol. 152, pp. 217–230, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  33. E. C. C. Tsang, C. Degang, and D. S. Yeung, “Approximations and reducts with covering generalized rough sets,” Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 279–289, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  34. J. S. Mi, W. Z. Wu, and W. X. Zhang, “Approaches to knowledge reduction based on variable precision rough set model,” Information Sciences, vol. 159, no. 3-4, pp. 255–272, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  35. X. T. Deng, Z. F. Li, and S. Y. Wang, “A minimax portfolio selection strategy with equilibrium,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 166, no. 1, pp. 278–292, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  36. X. Huang, “Mean-variance model for fuzzy capital budgeting,” Computers and Industrial Engineering, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 34–47, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. P. Gupta, M. K. Mehlawat, and A. Saxena, “Asset portfolio optimization using fuzzy mathematical programming,” Information Sciences, vol. 178, no. 6, pp. 1734–1755, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  38. X. Y. Zhou and G. Yin, “Markowitz's mean-variance portfolio selection with regime switching: a continuous-time model,” SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 1466–1482, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  39. M. Modrzejewski, “Feature selection using rough sets theory,” in Proceedings of the European Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 213–226, Vienna, Austria, 1993.
  40. F. F. Xu, D. Q. Miao, and L. Wei, “Fuzzy-rough attribute reduction via mutual information with an application to cancer classification,” Computers and Mathematics with Applications, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 1010–1017, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. D. J. Newman, S. Hettich, C. L. Blake, and C. J. Merz, “UCI Repository of Machine Learning Databases,” University of California, Department of Information and Computer Science, 1998, http://mlearn.ics.uci.edu/MLRepository.html.
  42. M. van der Gaag, T. Hoffman, M. Remijsen et al., “The five-factor model of the positive and negative syndrome scale II: a ten-fold cross-validation of a revised model,” Schizophrenia Research, vol. 85, no. 1–3, pp. 280–287, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus