Research Article
Frame Interpolation Based on Visual Correspondence and Coherency Sensitive Hashing
Table 2
Comparative results for the four resizing methods.
| Method | AG | IE | EI | SF | ID |
| Scaling | 10.8870 | 14.1536 | 106.7085 | 7.6176 | 27.9762 | Best cropping | 8.5673 | 9.6485 | 88.1226 | 7.5842 | 20.9809 | Seam carving | 9.6769 | 13.5044 | 96.8119 | 7.5244 | 26.1953 | Proposed method | 11.6518 | 14.3028 | 116.5497 | 7.6478 | 28.1341 |
|
|