The Static Stress Intensity Factor around the Antiplane Crack in an Infinite FGM Strip

<table>The effect of strip height  <svg height="12.4375" id="M97" style="vertical-align:-0.1638pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 8.8999996 12.4375" width="8.8999996" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,.062,12.162)"><path d="M499 88q-41 -46 -83.5 -73t-68.5 -27q-41 0 -19 98l52 225q10 43 8 59.5t-16 16.5q-37 0 -112 -65t-117 -135q-14 -42 -38 -179q-36 -7 -75 -20l-7 8l127 594q8 40 2.5 49t-35.5 9h-35l5 25q36 3 71.5 13t56.5 18t25 8q11 0 3 -38l-88 -417h2q77 102 195 167q44 24 79 24
q61 0 30 -130l-52 -220q-8 -33 4 -33q8 0 31 14.5t43 33.5z" id="x210E"></path></g>
</svg>  and crack length <svg height="7.9499998" id="M98" style="vertical-align:-0.1638pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 8.7250004 7.9499998" width="8.7250004" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,.062,7.675)"><path d="M483 97q-42 -50 -88.5 -79.5t-68.5 -29.5q-37 0 -17 93l22 102h-2q-54 -79 -144 -149q-59 -46 -100 -46q-24 0 -43 29t-19 86q0 78 34.5 153t94.5 120q41 31 94 51.5t98 20.5q29 0 72 -9q26 -6 39 -6l2 -4q-30 -117 -67 -323q-8 -41 2 -41q16 0 79 58zM374 387
q-32 15 -73 15q-52 0 -83 -23q-48 -36 -78 -108.5t-30 -152.5q0 -33 8.5 -50.5t20.5 -17.5q31 0 107 79t99 132q15 40 29 126z" id="x1D44E"></path></g>
</svg> on the stress intensity factor <svg height="15.0875" id="M99" style="vertical-align:-2.3205pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 32.862499 15.0875" width="32.862499" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,.062,12.138)"><path d="M488 658v-28q-47 -3 -58.5 -12t-11.5 -39q49 -2 97 -15t93.5 -39.5t73.5 -75t28 -112.5q0 -53 -19.5 -96.5t-50 -71t-70 -47t-77.5 -27.5t-75 -9q0 -36 11.5 -45.5t58.5 -12.5v-28h-223v28q47 3 58.5 12.5t11.5 45.5q-47 1 -94.5 14t-93 39.5t-74.5 76t-29 114.5
q0 51 19 93.5t49 70t69.5 47t77.5 28t76 10.5q0 30 -11 39t-54 12v28h218zM335 118v429q-34 -2 -67 -13.5t-63.5 -35t-49.5 -65.5t-19 -96q0 -56 18.5 -99t49 -67.5t63.5 -37.5t68 -15zM418 547v-429q35 2 67.5 14t63.5 35.5t50 66.5t19 99t-19 99t-50 66.5t-64 35t-67 13.5
z" id="x3A6"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,12.88,12.138)"><path d="M300 -147l-18 -23q-106 71 -159 185.5t-53 254.5v1q0 139 53 252.5t159 186.5l18 -24q-74 -62 -115.5 -173.5t-41.5 -242.5q0 -130 41.5 -242.5t115.5 -174.5z" id="x28"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,18.761,12.138)"><path d="M384 0h-275v27q67 5 81.5 18.5t14.5 68.5v385q0 38 -7.5 47.5t-40.5 10.5l-48 2v24q85 15 178 52v-521q0 -55 14.5 -68.5t82.5 -18.5v-27z" id="x31"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,26.921,12.138)"><path d="M275 270q0 -296 -211 -440l-19 23q75 62 116.5 174t41.5 243t-42 243t-116 173l19 24q211 -144 211 -440z" id="x29"></path></g>
</svg>.</table>

Mathematical Problems in Engineering

fig2

Figure 2

Figure 2: The Static Stress Intensity Factor around the Antiplane Crack in an Infinite FGM Strip 