Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2013, Article ID 635713, 6 pages
Research Article

Mathematical Modeling, Computation, and Experimental Imaging of Thin-Layer Objects by Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Institute of Measurement Science, Slovak Academy of Sciences, 84104 Bratislava, Slovakia

Received 14 May 2013; Revised 25 September 2013; Accepted 11 November 2013

Academic Editor: Eihab M. Abdel-Rahman

Copyright © 2013 Ivan Frollo. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. G. Wentzel, “Comments on Dirac's theory of magnetic monopoles,” Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement, vol. 37-38, pp. 163–174, 1966. View at Google Scholar
  2. J. A. C. Bland and B. Heinrich, Ultrathin Magnetic Structures III: Fundamentals of Nanomagnetism, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2005.
  3. O. Mosendz, G. Woltersdorf, B. Kardasz, B. Heinrich, and C. H. Back, “Magnetization dynamics in the presence of pure spin currents in magnetic single and double layers in spin ballistic and diffusive regimes,” Physical Review B, vol. 79, no. 22, Article ID 224412, 10 pages, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. N. Müsgens, E. Maynicke, M. Weidenbach et al., “Current-induced magnetization dynamics in single and double layer magnetic nanopillars grown by molecular beam epitaxy,” Journal of Physics D, vol. 41, no. 16, Article ID 164011, 5 pages, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. E. M. Haacke, M. Makki, Y. Ge et al., “Characterizing iron deposition in multiple sclerosis lesions using susceptibility weighted imaging,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 537–544, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. I. Frollo, P. Andris, J. Přibil, and V. Juráš, “Indirect susceptibility mapping of thin-layer samples using nuclear magnetic resonance imaging,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 3363–3367, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. P. T. Callaghan and J. Stepisnik, “Spatially-distributed pulsed gradient spin echo NMR using single-wire proximity,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 75, no. 24, pp. 4532–4535, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. Sekino, T. Matsumoto, K. Yamaguchi, N. Iriguchi, and S. Ueno, “A method for NMR imaging of a magnetic field generated by electric current,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 2188–2190, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. O. Strbak, P. Kopcansky, M. Timko, and I. Frollo, “Single biogenic magnetite nanoparticle physical characteristics. A biological impact study,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 49, pp. 457–462, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  10. E. M. Haacke, R. W. Brown, M. R. Thompson, and R. Venkatesan, “Magnetic properties of tissues: theory and measurement,” in Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Physical Principles and Sequence Design, chapter 25, pp. 741–779, Wiley-Liss, John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1st edition, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  11. J. D. Kraus and D. A. Fleisch, Electromagnetics with Applications, chapter 1, 2, McGraw-Hill, 5th edition, 1998.
  12. J. Jianming, Electromagnetic Analysis and Design in Magnetic Resonance Imaging, M. R. Neuman, Ed., Biomedical Engineering Series, CRC Press, 1999.
  13. G. Retter, Magnetische Felder und Kreise, chapter 2, VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften, Berlin, Germany, 1961.
  14. J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamicsedition, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 3rd edition, 1998.
  15. Textbook of Physics, Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics,