Research Article
Real-Time Gate Reassignment Based on Flight Delay Feature in Hub Airport
Table 3
Comparisons of optimization and manual gate reassignment.
| Time point | Reassignment method | Gate disturbance proportion | Apron disturbance proportion | Total disturbance proportion | Identified flight number | Total considered flight number | Disturbance value | Time costs (s) |
| 6:00 | Optimization | 8% | 0 | 8% | 50 | 281 | 2051.073 | 184.746 | Manual | 4% | 4% | 8% | 50 | 281 | 2173.52 |
| 9:00 | Optimization | 15.60% | 0 | 15.60% | 32 | 246 | 1314.537 | 117.996 | Manual | 12.50% | 9.40% | 21.90% | 32 | 246 | 1686.63 |
| 11:00 | Optimization | 36.11% | 0 | 36.11% | 36 | 207 | 1480.92 | 78.622 | Manual | 36.11% | 2.78% | 38.89% | 36 | 207 | 1604.34 |
| 13:00 | Optimization | 44.80% | 0 | 44.80% | 29 | 173 | 1028.72 | 77.729 | Manual | 44.80% | 6.90% | 51.70% | 29 | 173 | 1317.35 |
| 15:00 | Optimization | 36.36% | 0 | 36.36% | 44 | 151 | 1698.24 | 105.112 | Manual | 47.73% | 2.27% | 50.00% | 44 | 151 | 1931.66 |
|
|