Research Article
Matching Cost Filtering for Dense Stereo Correspondence
Table 1
Quantitative evaluation for the Middlebury image pairs.
| Method | Tsukuba | Venus | Teddy | Cones | AE | Non | All | Disc | Non | All | Disc | Non | All | Disc | Non | All | Disc |
| HCR | 1.56 | 1.78 | 8.07 | 0.22 | 0.34 | 2.96 | 6.36 | 11.93 | 15.62 | 2.88 | 8.14 | 8.22 | 5.67 | GIR | 1.87 | 2.23 | 7.92 | 0.27 | 0.47 | 2.60 | 6.74 | 12.28 | 16.20 | 2.94 | 8.35 | 8.36 | 5.85 | ASW | 1.38 | 1.85 | 6.90 | 0.71 | 1.19 | 6.13 | 7.88 | 13.30 | 18.60 | 3.97 | 9.79 | 8.26 | 6.66 | HCN | 2.14 | 2.94 | 9.16 | 1.25 | 1.94 | 9.36 | 7.22 | 15.28 | 17.96 | 3.41 | 12.93 | 9.61 | 7.77 | GIN | 2.53 | 3.32 | 8.63 | 1.98 | 3.13 | 15.81 | 8.35 | 16.87 | 18.81 | 3.64 | 12.64 | 9.70 | 8.78 | DCBG | 5.90 | 7.26 | 21.0 | 1.35 | 1.91 | 11.20 | 10.5 | 17.2 | 22.2 | 5.34 | 11.9 | 14.9 | 10.89 |
|
|