Matching Cost Filtering for Dense Stereo Correspondence

Table 1

Quantitative evaluation for the Middlebury image pairs.

Method	Tsukuba			Venus			Teddy			Cones			AE
	Non	All	Disc	Non	All	Disc	Non	All	Disc	Non	All	Disc
HCR	1.56	1.78	8.07	0.22	0.34	2.96	6.36	11.93	15.62	2.88	8.14	8.22	5.67
GIR	1.87	2.23	7.92	0.27	0.47	2.60	6.74	12.28	16.20	2.94	8.35	8.36	5.85
ASW	1.38	1.85	6.90	0.71	1.19	6.13	7.88	13.30	18.60	3.97	9.79	8.26	6.66
HCN	2.14	2.94	9.16	1.25	1.94	9.36	7.22	15.28	17.96	3.41	12.93	9.61	7.77
GIN	2.53	3.32	8.63	1.98	3.13	15.81	8.35	16.87	18.81	3.64	12.64	9.70	8.78
DCBG	5.90	7.26	21.0	1.35	1.91	11.20	10.5	17.2	22.2	5.34	11.9	14.9	10.89