Application of an Integrated Model with MCDM and IPA to Evaluate the Service Quality of Transshipment Port
Table 3
Quantities and scores for alternatives under quantitative criteria.
Quantitative criteria
Quantity
Score
C
12
Proximity of the feeder port (nautical mile)
A 1
6356
10.0
A 2
5401
8.5
A 3
7288
7.4
C
21
Volumes of import/export containers (TEU)
A 1
13731000
2.1
A 2
5446000
5.3
A 3
25750000
10.0
C
22
Volume of transshipment containers (TEU)
A 1
10150000
4.7
A 2
4810000
10.0
A 3
400000
0.4
C
23
Frequency of ship calls (vessel/week)
A 1
435
4.1
A 2
177
10.0
A 3
206
4.7
C
31
Infrastructure conditions (length of wharf, m)
A 1
8530
8.7
A 2
7453
10.0
A 3
8387
9.8
C
32
Port facilities and equipment (crane)
A 1
84
8.0
A 2
67
10.0
A 3
82
9.8
C
41
Container handling efficiency (move/h)
A 1
34
9.4
A 2
32
10.0
A 3
30
8.8
C
51
Port charge($US/TEU)
A 1
338
6.4
A 2
110
2.1
A 3
70
10.0
Source: Hong Kong Maritime Industry Council web site, http://www.mic.gov.hk/. Port of Kaohsiung web site, http://www.khb.gov.tw/. Port of Shanghai web site, http://www.portshanghai.com.cn/. Containerization International Yearbook. The Institute of Transportation, Ministry of Transportation and Communications, Taiwan.
