Research Article  Open Access
Jinsong Hu, Yulan Wang, "A HighAccuracy Linear Conservative Difference Scheme for RosenauRLW Equation", Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2013, Article ID 870291, 8 pages, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/870291
A HighAccuracy Linear Conservative Difference Scheme for RosenauRLW Equation
Abstract
We study the initialboundary value problem for RosenauRLW equation. We propose a threelevel linear finite difference scheme, which has the theoretical accuracy of . The scheme simulates two conservative properties of original problem well. The existence, uniqueness of difference solution, and a priori estimates in infinite norm are obtained. Furthermore, we analyze the convergence and stability of the scheme by energy method. At last, numerical experiments demonstrate the theoretical results.
1. Introduction
In the study of the dynamics of compact discrete systems, wavewave and wavewall interactions cannot be described by the wellknown KdV equation. To overcome this shortcoming of KdV equation, Rosenau proposed the following Rosenau equation in [1, 2]: Rosenau equation (1) is usually used to describe the dense discrete system and simulate the longchain transmission model through an LC flow in radio and computer fields. The existence and uniqueness of solution to (1) were proved by Park in [3]. Rosenau equation is also regarded as the transformation of the Regularized Long Wave (RLW) equation (see [4]): which is usually used to simulate the long wave in nonlinear emanative medium. RLW equation plays important role in the study of nonlinear diffusion wave because it could model lots of physical phenomena. As RLW equation and KdV equation have the same approximative order when they are used to describe motivations, RLW equation could simulate almost all of the applications of KdV equation [5]. Therefore, there are many works about Rosenau equation (1) and RLW equation (2) (see, e.g., [6–23]).
RosenauRLW equation is the generalization of Rosenau equation (1) and RLW equation (2). The authors of [24–27] studied the numerical solution of RosenauRLW equation. Motivated by the above works, we consider the initialboundary value problem of the following RosenauRLW equation: where is a smooth function.
As the solitary wave solution of (3) is (see, e.g., [24–26]) the initialboundary problem (3)–(5) is in accordance with the Cauchy problem of (3) when , . It is easy to verify that problem (3)–(5) satisfies the following conservative laws [27]: where and are both constants only depending on initial data.
Li and VuQuoc pointed in [28] that in some areas, the ability to preserve some invariant properties of the original differential equation is a criterion to judge the success of a numerical simulation. It is said in [29] that conservative difference scheme can simulate the conservative law of initial problem well and it could avoid the nonlinear blowup. Therefore, constructing conservative difference scheme is an important and significant job. To our knowledge, the theoretic accuracy of the existing difference scheme for RosenauRLW equation (see [24, 25, 27]) is . Particularly, in [27], the authors proposed a threelevel linear conservative difference scheme for problem (3)–(5), whose theoretic accuracy is . One does not need iteration when solving the equation numerically using this scheme. Henceforth, it could save some computing time. Using Richardson extrapolation idea, we will propose a threelevel linear difference scheme which has the theoretic accuracy of without refined mesh in this paper. Our scheme simulates the two conservative laws (7) and (8) well. And we will study the a priori estimate, existence, and uniqueness of the difference solution. Furthermore, we shall analyze the convergence and stability.
The rest of this paper is organized as follows. We propose the conservative difference scheme in Section 2 and prove the existence and uniqueness of solution to difference scheme by mathematical induction in Section 3. Section 4 is devoted to the prior estimate, convergence, and stability of the difference scheme. In Section 5, we verify our theoretical analysis by numerical experiments.
2. Difference Scheme and Its Conservative Law
Let and be the uniform stepsize in the spatial and temporal directions, respectively. Denote , , and , where . Let be the difference approximation of at ; that is, . Let We define the difference operators, inner product, and norms that will be used in this paper as follows:
Lemma 1. It follows from the CauchySchwarz inequality and summation by parts (see [30]) that, for any ,
In the paper, denotes a general positive constant which may have a different value in a different occurrence.
Consider the following finite difference scheme for problem (3)–(5): The discrete boundary condition (15) is reasonable from the boundary condition of (3)–(5). The following theorem shows how the difference scheme (12)–(15) simulates the conservative law numerically.
Theorem 2. Suppose that and . Then the scheme (12)–(15) is conservative for discrete energy; that is, , where
Proof. Multiplying in the two sides of (12) and taking summation for , we could obtain from (15) and summation by parts [30] that
On the other hand,
From the definition of , we know that (16) could be deduced from (19)(20).
Taking an inner product of (12) and (i.e., ), we could obtain from boundary condition (15) and summation by parts [30] that
where
On the other hand,
Taking (23)–(25) into (21), we have
From the definition of , we know that (17) could be obtained by deducing the above equality from to .
3. Solvability
Theorem 3. The solution of difference scheme (12)–(15) is unique.
Proof. We will use the mathematical induction to prove our theorem. We first note that and are determined uniquely by (13) and (14).
Suppose that are the unique solution to scheme (12)–(15). Next we prove that there exists unique which satisfies (12)–(15).
Consider
Taking an inner product of (27) and , we could obtain from boundary condition (15) and summation by parts [30] that
Note that
Furthermore, from Lemma 1, one can easily obtain that
Henceforth we could have
from (28)–(30).
That is, (27) only admits zero solution. So, there exits unique that satisfies (12).
4. Convergence and Stability of the Difference Scheme
Suppose that is the solution to problem (3)–(5). Let . Then the truncation error of the difference scheme (12)–(15) is Making use of the Taylor expansion theorem, we know that as , .
Lemma 4. Assume that , . Then the solution to problem (3)–(5) satisfies
Proof. From (8), we know that Then from the Sobolev inequality.
Theorem 5. Suppose that , . Then the solution to difference scheme (12)–(15) satisfies thus,
Proof. From Theorem 2 and (30) we can get that is, Then the discrete Sobolev inequality (see [30]) shows that
Theorem 6. Suppose that , . Then the solution to difference scheme (12)–(15) converges to the solution of problem (3)–(5) in the sense of norm , and the convergent rate is .
Proof. Subtracting (12)–(15) from (32) and letting , we have
Taking the inner product of (43) and , and using boundary condition (44), we obtain
Noticing that
we can obtain that
from the CauchySchwarz inequality and (30), and (44).
Then taking the inner product of (41) and , and combining with boundary condition (44) again, one can get
Similar to (23), we have
By using Lemma 4, Theorem 5, Lemma 1, and the CauchySchwarz inequality, we can get
Taking (49)(50) into (48), we obtain
Set
Summarizing (51) from to , we get
From (42) and (47), we know that
Furthermore,
Therefore,
The discrete Gronwall inequality (see [30]) implies that
Then we can obtain
from the discrete Sobolev inequality.
We could prove the following theorems in a similar way of Theorem 6.
Theorem 7. Suppose that and . The solution to difference scheme (12)–(15) is stable in the sense of norm .
5. Numerical Simulations
As the difference scheme (12)–(15) is a linear system about , it does not need iteration when we solve it numerically.
Let , , , and For some different values of and , we list errors at several times in Table 1 and verify the accuracy of the difference scheme in Table 2. The numerical simulation of two conservative quantities (7) and (8) is listed in Table 3.


The stability and convergence of the scheme are verified by these numerical experiments. And it shows that our proposed algorithm is effective and reliable.
Acknowledgments
The authors are very grateful to the anonymous referees for their careful reading and useful suggestions, which greatly improved the presentation of the paper. This work is supported in part by Scientific Research Foundation of Sichuan Provincial Education Department (no. 11ZB009), the Key Scientific Research Foundation of Xihua University (no. Z0912611), and the fund of Key Disciplinary of Computer Software and Theory, Sichuan, China, Grant no. SZD0802091.
References
 P. Rosenau, “A quasicontinuous description of a nonlinear transmission line,” Physica Scripta, vol. 34, pp. 827–829, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
 P. Rosenau, “Dynamics of dense discrete systems,” Progress of Theoretical Physics, vol. 79, pp. 1028–1042, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
 M. A. Park, “On the Rosenau equation,” Matemática Aplicada e Computacional, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 145–152, 1990. View at: Google Scholar  Zentralblatt MATH  MathSciNet
 D. H. Peregrine, “Calculations of the development of an unduiar bore,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 25, pp. 321–330, 1966. View at: Google Scholar
 D. J. Kortewag and G. Devries, “On the change of form of long waves advancing in a rectangular canal, and on a new type of long stationary waves,” Philosophical Magazine, vol. 39, pp. 422–443, 1985. View at: Google Scholar
 S. K. Chung and S. N. Ha, “Finite element Galerkin solutions for the Rosenau equation,” Applicable Analysis, vol. 54, no. 12, pp. 39–56, 1994. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  Zentralblatt MATH  MathSciNet
 L. Zhang, “A finite difference scheme for generalized regularized longwave equation,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 168, no. 2, pp. 962–972, 2005. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  Zentralblatt MATH  MathSciNet
 K. Omrani, F. Abidi, T. Achouri, and N. Khiari, “A new conservative finite difference scheme for the Rosenau equation,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 201, no. 12, pp. 35–43, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  Zentralblatt MATH  MathSciNet
 S. K. Chung, “Finite difference approximate solutions for the Rosenau equation,” Applicable Analysis, vol. 69, no. 12, pp. 149–156, 1998. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  Zentralblatt MATH  MathSciNet
 S. K. Chung and A. K. Pani, “Numerical methods for the Rosenau equation,” Applicable Analysis, vol. 77, no. 34, pp. 351–369, 2001. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  Zentralblatt MATH  MathSciNet
 S. A. V. Manickam, A. K. Pani, and S. K. Chung, “A secondorder splitting combined with orthogonal cubic spline collocation method for the Rosenau equation,” Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 695–716, 1998. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  Zentralblatt MATH  MathSciNet
 J. Hu and K. Zheng, “Two conservative difference schemes for the generalized Rosenau equation,” Boundary Value Problems, vol. 2010, Article ID 543503, 18 pages, 2010. View at: Google Scholar  Zentralblatt MATH  MathSciNet
 Y. D. Kim and H. Y. Lee, “The convergence of finite element Galerkin solution for the Roseneau equation,” The Korean Journal of Computational & Applied Mathematics, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 171–180, 1998. View at: Google Scholar  Zentralblatt MATH  MathSciNet
 Q. S. Chang, G. B. Wang, and B. L. Guo, “Conservative scheme for a model of nonlinear dispersive waves and its solitary waves induced by boundary motion,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 360–375, 1991. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  Zentralblatt MATH  MathSciNet
 D. Bhardwaj and R. Shankar, “A computational method for regularized long wave equation,” Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol. 40, no. 12, pp. 1397–1404, 2000, Advances in partial differential equations, III. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  Zentralblatt MATH  MathSciNet
 L. M. Zhang and Q. S. Chang, “A new finite difference method for regularized long wave equation,” Chinese Journal on Numerical Methods and Computer Applications, vol. 23, pp. 58–66, 2000. View at: Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 A. A. Soliman and M. H. Hussien, “Collocation solution for RLW equation with septic spline,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 161, no. 2, pp. 623–636, 2005. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  Zentralblatt MATH  MathSciNet
 K. R. Raslan, “A computational method for the regularized long wave (RLW) equation,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 167, no. 2, pp. 1101–1118, 2005. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  Zentralblatt MATH  MathSciNet
 A. Esen and S. Kutluay, “Application of a lumped Galerkin method to the regularized long wave equation,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 174, no. 2, pp. 833–845, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  Zentralblatt MATH  MathSciNet
 J. I. Ramos, “Explicit finite difference methods for the EW and RLW equations,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 179, no. 2, pp. 622–638, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  Zentralblatt MATH  MathSciNet
 H. Gu and N. Chen, “Leastsquares mixed finite element methods for the RLW equations,” Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 749–758, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  Zentralblatt MATH  MathSciNet
 SirajulIslam, S. Haq, and A. Ali, “A meshfree method for the numerical solution of the RLW equation,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 223, no. 2, pp. 997–1012, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  Zentralblatt MATH  MathSciNet
 L. Mei and Y. Chen, “Numerical solutions of RLW equation using Galerkin method with extrapolation techniques,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 183, no. 8, pp. 1609–1616, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 J.M. Zuo, Y.M. Zhang, T.D. Zhang, and F. Chang, “A new conservative difference scheme for the general RosenauRLW equation,” Boundary Value Problems, vol. 2010, Article ID 516260, 13 pages, 2010. View at: Google Scholar  Zentralblatt MATH  MathSciNet
 X. Pan and L. Zhang, “Numerical simulation for general RosenauRLW equation: an average linearized conservative scheme,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2012, Article ID 517818, 15 pages, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  Zentralblatt MATH  MathSciNet
 R. C. Mittal and R. K. Jain, “Numerical solution of general RosenauRLW equation using quintic Bsplines collocation method,” Communications in Numerical Analysis, vol. 2012, Article ID 00129, 16 pages, 2012. View at: Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 X. Pan and L. Zhang, “On the convergence of a conservative numerical scheme for the usual RosenauRLW equation,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 3371–3378, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  Zentralblatt MATH  MathSciNet
 S. Li and L. VuQuoc, “Finite difference calculus invariant structure of a class of algorithms for the nonlinear KleinGordon equation,” SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 1839–1875, 1995. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  Zentralblatt MATH  MathSciNet
 Z. Fei, V. M. PérezGarcía, and L. Vázquez, “Numerical simulation of nonlinear Schrödinger systems: a new conservative scheme,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 71, no. 23, pp. 165–177, 1995. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  Zentralblatt MATH  MathSciNet
 Y. L. Zhou, Applications of Discrete Functional Analysis to the Finite Difference Method, International Academic Publishers, Beijing, China, 1990. View at: MathSciNet
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 Jinsong Hu and Yulan Wang. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.