Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2013, Article ID 915781, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/915781
Research Article

Numerical Study of Surface Roughness and Magnetic Field between Rough and Porous Rectangular Plates

1Department of Mathematics, Bangalore University, Bangalore 560001, India
2Department of Mathematics, JSSATE, Bangalore 560060, India
3Department of Mathematics, MSRIT, Bangalore 560054, India

Received 25 July 2013; Revised 30 October 2013; Accepted 31 October 2013

Academic Editor: Jun Jiang

Copyright © 2013 Ramesh B. Kudenatti et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. G. Davies, “The generation of pressure between rough, fluid lubricated, moving, deformable surfaces,” Lubrication of Engineering, vol. 19, p. 246, 1963. View at Google Scholar
  2. R. A. Burton, “Effect of two-dimensional sinusoidal roughness on the load support characteristics of a lubricant film,” Journal of Basic Engineering, vol. 85, no. 2, p. 246, 1963. View at Google Scholar
  3. C. H. Christensen, “Stochastic models for hydrodynamic lubrication of rough surfaces,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, vol. 184, no. 1, pp. 1013–1026, 1969. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. K. Gururajan and J. Prakash, “Roughness effects in a narrow porous journal bearing with arbitrary porous wall thickness,” International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 1003–1016, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  5. H. L. Chiang, C.-H. Hsu, and R. Lin, “Lubrication performance of finite journal bearings considering effects of couple stresses and surface roughness,” Tribology International, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 297–307, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. N. M. Bujurke and R. B. Kudenatti, “Surface roughness effects on squeeze film poroelastic bearings,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 174, no. 2, pp. 1181–1195, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  7. S. Kamiyama, “Magnetohydrodynamic journal bearing (report 1),” Journal of Lubrication Technology, vol. 91, pp. 380–386, 1969. View at Google Scholar
  8. M. I. Anwar and C. M. Rodkiewicz, “Nonuniform magnetic field effects in MHD slider bearing,” Journal of Lubrication Technology, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 101–105, 1972. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. E. A. Hamza, “Magnetohydrodynamic effects on a fluid film squeezed between two rotating surfaces,” Journal of Physics D, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 547–554, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. E. R. Maki, D. C. Kuzma, and R. L. Donnelly, “Magnetohydrodynamic lubrication flow between parallel plates,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 26, pp. 537–543, 1966. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. J. B. Shukla, “Hydromagnetic theory of squeeze films,” Journal of Basic Engineering, vol. 87, pp. 142–144, 1965. View at Google Scholar
  12. N. M. Bujurke and R. B. Kudenatti, “MHD lubrication flow between rough rectangular plates,” Fluid Dynamics Research, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 334–345, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  13. G. S. Beavers and D. D. Joseph, “Boundary conditions at a naturally permeable wall,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 197–207, 1967. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. V. T. Morgan and A. Cameron, “The mechanism of lubrication on porous metal bearings,” in Proceedings of the Conference on Lubrication and Wear, vol. 89, pp. 151–157, Institute of Mechanical Experiments, London, UK, 1957.
  15. J. R. Lin, “Magneto-hydrodynamic squeeze film characteristics for finite rectangular plates,” Industrial Lubrication and Tribology, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 84–89, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar