Research Article
Automated Flare Prediction Using Extreme Learning Machine
Table 3
Comparison of all the methods.
| Level | Methods | Correctness | True positive | True negative | Weighted true rate | Positive accuracy | Negative accuracy | Weighted accuracy |
| 0 | LR | 0.83 | 0.65 | 0.93 | 0.85 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.83 | SVM | 0.85 | 0.74 | 0.89 | 0.85 | 0.73 | 0.90 | 0.85 | LR + SVM | 0.86 | 0.76 | 0.89 | 0.86 | 0.72 | 0.92 | 0.86 | LR + ELM | 0.81 | 0.64 | 0.87 | 0.81 | 0.65 | 0.86 | 0.81 |
| 1 | LR | 0.76 | 0.71 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.26 | 0.96 | 0.76 | SVM | 0.70 | 0.43 | 0.74 | 0.65 | 0.18 | 0.9 | 0.70 | LR + SVM | 0.72 | 0.53 | 0.74 | 0.67 | 0.14 | 0.95 | 0.72 | LR + ELM | 0.70 | 0.44 | 0.75 | 0.67 | 0.29 | 0.85 | 0.70 |
| 2 | LR | 0.74 | 0.83 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.15 | 0.93 | 0.74 | SVM | 0.68 | 0.39 | 0.72 | 0.62 | 0.13 | 0.93 | 0.68 | LR + SVM | 0.65 | 0.35 | 0.72 | 0.61 | 0.22 | 0.83 | 0.65 | LR + ELM | 0.70 | 0.48 | 0.74 | 0.66 | 0.28 | 0.87 | 0.70 |
| 3 | LR | 0.86 | 1 | 0.86 | 0.88 | 0.03 | 1 | 0.86 | SVM | 0.83 | 0.37 | 0.87 | 0.80 | 0.21 | 0.94 | 0.83 | LR + SVM | 0.84 | 0.44 | 0.87 | 0.81 | 0.21 | 0.95 | 0.84 | LR + ELM | 0.85 | 0.52 | 0.89 | 0.84 | 0.35 | 0.94 | 0.86 |
|
|