Mathematical Problems in Engineering

Mathematical Problems in Engineering / 2013 / Article
Special Issue

Selected Papers from the International Conference on Information, Communication, and Engineering 2013

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2013 |Article ID 919318 |

Ying-Shieh Kung, Nguyen Vu Quynh, Nguyen Trung Hieu, Jin-Mu Lin, "FPGA Realization of Sensorless PMSM Speed Controller Based on Extended Kalman Filter", Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2013, Article ID 919318, 13 pages, 2013.

FPGA Realization of Sensorless PMSM Speed Controller Based on Extended Kalman Filter

Academic Editor: Teen-Hang Meen
Received09 Sep 2013
Accepted22 Oct 2013
Published04 Dec 2013


Based on extended Kalman filter (EKF), the design and FPGA implementation of a sensorless control intellectual property (IP) for permanent magnet synchronous motor (PMSM) drive are presented in this paper. Firstly, the mathematical model for PMSM is derived and the vector control is built up. Secondly, the rotor flux angle (FA) and rotor speed which are estimated by using EKF are described. These estimated values are feedbacked to the current loop for vector control and to the speed loop for speed control. Thirdly, the very-high-speed IC hardware description language (VHDL) is adopted to describe the behavior of the sensorless speed control IP which includes the circuits of space vector pulse width modulation (SVPWM), coordinate transformation, EKF, and PI controller. Finally, to evaluate the effectiveness and correctness of the proposed of system, a cosimulation work performed by Simulink and ModelSim is firstly conducted. Then, an experimental system by FPGA chip and motor driving board is set up to further validate the performance of the proposed EKF-based sensorless speed control IP.

1. Introduction

PMSM has been increasingly used in many automation control fields as actuators, due to its advantages of superior power density, high-performance motion control with fast speed, and better accuracy. However, conventional motor control needs a speed sensor or an optical encoder to measure the rotor speed and feedback it to the controller for ensuring the precision speed control. Such sensor presents some disadvantages such as drive cost, machine size, reliability, and noise immunity. In recent years, a sensorless control without position and speed sensors for PMSM drive become a popular research topic in the literature [17]. Those sensorless control strategies have sliding mode observer (SMO), extended Kalman filter (EKF), reduced-order EKF, and so forth. The EKF is basically a full-order stochastic observer for the recursive optimum state estimation of a nonlinear dynamic system in real time by using signals that are in noisy environment [7]. Comparing with SMO, EKF can directly estimate the angular speed and it has high convergence rate which can give a more rapid speed response [5]. However, EKF requires heavy online matrix computing; therefore, the complex computation becomes a challenge for a fixed-point processor system. In realization, a fixed-point processor using digital signal processor (DSP) and field programmable gate array (FPGA) both can provide a good solution in this issue. Particularly, FPGA with programmable hard-wired feature, fast computation ability, shorter design cycle, embedding processor, low power consumption, and higher density is better for the implementation of the digital system [8, 9] than DSP.

Recently, a cosimulation work by Electronic Design Automation (EDA) Simulator Link has been gradually applied to verify the effectiveness of the Verilog and VHDL code in the motor drive system [1012]. The EDA Simulator Link [13] provides a cosimulation interface between MATLAB or Simulink and HDL simulators-ModelSim [14]. Using it you can verify a VHDL, Verilog, or mixed-language implementation against your Simulink model or MATLAB algorithm [13]. Therefore, EDA Simulator Link lets you use MATLAB code and Simulink models as a test bench that generates stimulus for an HDL simulation and analyzes the simulation’s response [13]. In this paper, a cosimulation by EDA Simulator Link is applied to sensorless speed control for PMSM drive. The PMSM, inverter, and speed command are performed in Simulink and the EKF algorithm; current vector controller and speed PI controller described by VHDL code are executed in ModelSim. After successful verification in simulation, an FPGA-based experimental system is established with configuration as in Figure 1 for realizing the proposed IP code again, and experiment results will validate the effectiveness of the sensorless speed control system of PMSM drive.

2. System Description of PMSM Drive and Sensorless Speed Control

The sensorless speed control block diagram for PMSM drive is shown in Figure 1. The modeling of PMSM, the EKF-based rotor flux angle (FA) and rotor speed estimation, and the PI controller are introduced as follows.

2.1. Mathematical Model of PMSM

The mathematical model of a PMSM is described, in two-axissynchronous rotating reference frame, as follows: where , are the and axes voltages; , , are theandaxes currents,is the phase winding resistance; , are the and axes inductance;is the rotating speed of magnet flux; and is the permanent magnet flux linkage.

The current loop control of PMSM drive in Figure 1 is based on a vector control approach. That is, if the is forced to 0, the PMSM will be decoupled, and controlling a PMSM is like controlling a DC motor. After decoupling, the motor’s torque is proportional to : Considering the mechanical load, the overall dynamic equation of PMSM drive system is obtained by where is the motor torque,is pole pairs,is torque constant, is the inertial value, is damping ratio, is the external torque, and is rotor speed.

2.2. Extended Kalman Filter (EKF)

For a motor stochastic nonlinear equation, it can be written in the following form: where,, and are system state, system input, and system output, respectively. Theandrepresent system noise and measurement noise which are zero-mean white Gaussian distribution with covarianceand, respectively. Once a nominal solution to a motor nonlinear equation can be found in (4)-(5), the linearized perturbation equation is where the Jacobian and output matrices are defined as follows: After discretization with sampling time, (6) becomes whereis an exponential matrix and its computation can be simplified by Further, Therefore, the discrete model of (6)-(7) becomes whereand.

The EKF is an optimal estimator which searches the cost functionat the least square sense. The is defined by, which is the difference of estimation of stateand system state . The EKF algorithm is described by the following two-step recursive equations.

Step 1 (prediction step). From (4) and using a simple rectangular integration,
or from (12)
The covariance is updated by

Step 2 (innovation step). Consider
The Kalman gain is calculated by Figure 2 shows the procedure of EKF with two step above, after measurement update, it will be changed to time update.

2.3. Design of the Sensorless PMSM Based on EKF

The circuit equation of PMSM on the d-q rotating coordinate in (1) is re-formulated as where. Transforming (20), the circuit equation of PMSM on thefixed coordinate can be derived by the following equation: whereis voltage on fixed coordinate;is current on fixed coordinate;is angular position at magnet flux; and is differential operator. If we choose the as the state variable of the PMSM mathematical model, then (21) can be expanded to the following formulation: where,, and. From (8) and (22), the Jacobian and output matrices can be obtained: Further, substituting (24) into (10), the exponential matrix is shown as follows: As the results, the EKF algorithm in (14)–(19) can be carried out to estimate the state value. The initial values of, , and need to be chosen. Through the recursive calculation, the state value of is estimated at each sampling period; then the rotor speed can be derived by

Finally, a summary for the estimation of rotor FA and rotor speed based on EKF is presented as follows.

Step 1. Set the initial values of , , , and .

Step 2. Measure the values of,,, and from PMSM system.

Step 3. Estimate the temporary state variables from (14). In addition, refer to (22), and the scalar form of the prediction equation can be expressed as follows:

Step 4. Calculate thefrom (26).

Step 5. Obtain the temporary covariance matrix from (16). Because matrixis symmetric matrix by , it can be chosen by the following form:

Hence, from (16), individual elements of could be updated as follows:

Step 6. Calculate the Kalman gain from (19). Using (25) and (29), the formulation is further simplified as follows. Firstly, whererepresents the uncertainties of measurement variable which are very difficult to know. Hence, is often chosen as unity matrix for simplifying the task but does not affect the outcome (31). Since, (31) can be rewritten in the following form: To normalize the input value and to prevent the numerical overflow condition which occurred during computation, (32) is normalized and those values are all divided by 4. Therefore, (32) becomes where. Then, from (19), the Kalman gain can be calculated by

Step 7. Tune the present state variables from (17), and its scalar form is shown as follows: whereis the element in Kalman gainand .

Step 8. Update the present covariance matrixfrom (18), wherecan be directly obtained as follows:

Step 9. Calculate the rotor speed from (27); then setand go back to Step 2.

3. Design of Sensorless Speed Controller IP

Figure 3 illustrates the internal architecture of the proposed FPGA implementation of a sensorless speed control IP for PMSM drive system. The internal circuit comprises a Nios II embedded processor IP and an application IP. The Nios II processor is depicted to generate the speed command, collect the response data, and communicate with external device. All programs in Nios II processor are coded in the C language. The application IP includes mainly a circuit of an EKF-based rotor FA and rotor speed estimation, a speed PI controller, a circuit for current controllers and coordinate transformation (CCCT), a SVPWM circuit, and an ADC interface circuit. The sampling frequencies of the speed control loop and current control loop are designed with 2 kHz and 16 kHz, respectively. The frequency divider generates 50 Mhz (Clk) and 12.5 Mhz (Clk-step) clock to supply all circuits in Figure 3. The internal circuit of CCCT performs the function of two PI controllers, table look-up for sin/cos function, and the coordinate transformation for Clark, Park, inverse Park, and modified inverse Clarke. The detailed circuit design of CCCT, speed PI controller, ADC interface, and SVPWM generation in Figure 3 refers to [8]. Herein, only the digital hardware circuit design of the EKF-based rotor FA and rotor speed estimation is described. To reduce the FPGA resource usage, a finite-state machine (FSM) is employed to model the EKF-based algorithm whose design procedure and mathematical formulation are presented in the previous section. The design result is shown in Figure 4 which uses one adder, one multiplier, one divider, two sin/cos look-up table, shifters, registers, and so forth and manipulates 131 steps machine to carry out the overall computation. The data type adopts 16-bit length with Q15 format and 2’s complement operation. The multiplier, adder, and divider apply Altera LPM (Library Parameterized Modules) standard. In Figure 4, the steps execute the calculation of Jacobian matrix and predict temporary state variables; perform the computation of temporary covariance matrix; steps are for state error calculation; steps update of the present covariance matrix and calculate the Kalman gain ; describe the present state tuning as well as executing the computation of rotor FA and rotor speed. According to (30), the computation of temporary covariance matrixin Figure 4 is described in Figure 5. Further, according to (18), (33)-(34), and (36), the update of the present covariance matrix and calculation the Kalman gain in Figure 4 are illustrated in Figure 6. The operation of each step in Figure 4 is 80 ns (12.5 MHz) in FPGA; therefore a total of 131 steps need only 10.48 μs operation times. The FPGA (Altera) resource usages of EKF-based rotor FA and rotor speed estimation in Figure 4 is 4,158 LEs (logic elements) and 2,890 RAM bits. Additionally, the FPGA resource usages of the circuits of CCCT, speed PI controller, ADC interface, and SVPWM in Figure 3 are 864 LEs and 24,576 RAM, 2,043 LEs and 0RAM bits, 136 LEs and 0RAM bits, and 1,221 LEs and 0RAM bits, respectively.

4. Simulink/ModelSim Cosimulation and Its Simulation Results

The Simulink/ModelSim cosimulation architecture for sensorless PMSM speed control system is shown in Figure 7. The SimPowerSystem-Blockset in the Simulink executes the PMSM and the IGBT-based inverter. The EDA simulator link for ModelSim executes the cosimulation using VHDL code running in ModelSim program. It executes the function of the sensorless speed controller by three works. The work-1 to work-3 of ModelSim in Figure 7, respectively, perform the function of speed loop PI controller, the function of current controller and coordinate transformation (CCCT) and SVPWM, and the function of EKF-based rotor FA and rotor speed estimation. The sampling frequency in current control loop and EKF-based estimation algorithm is designed with 16 kHz, but in speed control loop is 2 kHz. The clocks of 50 MHz and 12.5 MHz will supply all works of ModelSim. The FPGA (Altera) resource usages of work-1 to work-3 are 2,043 LEs and 0 RAM bits, 2,085 LEs and 24,576 RAM bits, and 4,158 LEs and 2,890 RAM bits, respectively.

In simulation, the designed PMSM parameters used in Figure 7 are as follows: pole pairs are 4, stator phase resistance is 1.3 Ω, stator inductance is 6.3 mH, inertia is  kg*m2, and friction factor is  N*m*s. PI gains in speed control loop are designed with and . To evaluate the proposed controller performance, PMSM running at low speed (200 rpm) and inverse speed (from 200 rpm to −200 rpm or vice versa) condition is firstly considered, and its simulation results regarding as the speed step response, the current response as well as the actual rotor flux angle (FA) and the estimated rotor flux angle are shown in Figure 8. It shows that the motor speed gives a good dynamic response performance with a little overshoot and 25 ms rising time. It also shows that the estimated rotor speed can track actual rotor speed well. Figure 8(b) shows a successful vector control because is controlled to zero. Figure 8(c) shows that the estimated rotor FA can fast track the actual rotor FA even in the inverse speed command condition. Further, another simulation case while the PMSM running at wide-range high speed (from 0 rpm → 1000 rpm → 2000 rpm → 1000 rpm → −1000 pm → −2000 rpm) and inverse speed (from 1000 rpm to −1000 rpm) condition is tested, and its simulation results are shown in Figure 9. It presents that not only at speed tracking but also at rotor FA tracking, the estimated value adopted by EKF method can give a good follow to the real rotor value. However, except in the initial condition, the actual rotor speed gives a fast step response by 18 ms rising time, near 0 mm steady-state value, and maximum 17.5% overshoot.

5. Experimental System and Results

After confirming the correctness of the proposed EKF-based sensorless control IP by simulation, the VHDL codes are directly applied to the experimental FPGA-based sensorless PMSM drive system. The block diagram and real experimental system are depicted in Figure 10. The main devices include a PMSM, a DE2 board with Altera CycloneII FPGA, a motor driver, and a power supplier. The parameters of the PMSM are  Ω,  mH, and 4 pole pairs. The input voltage, continuous current, rating torque, rating speed, and continuous power of the PMSM are 220 V, 12 A, 2.3 N-m, 3000 rpm, and 750 W, respectively. The Altera CycloneII EP2C35 chip adopted in the design possesses 33,216 LEs, maximum 475 available I/O pins, 483,840 RAM, and 35 embedded multipliers. The chip can be embedded with a Nios II multicore processor that is equipped with several 32-bit CPU, flexibility of core size, 1 to 16 Mbytes of flash memory in the available memory chip, 1 Mbyte SRAM, 16 M byte SDRAM, and 4 Gbytes memory outside of the chip. In implementation, except the VHDL codes of CCCT, EKF, and PI controller, the VHDL code of ADC interface circuit should be added and integrated and then downloaded into FPGA. The PI gains of speed control loop in experiment are designed with and .

In the experimental case, PMSM running at low speed (200 rpm) and inverse speed (from 200 rpm to −200 rpm or vice versa) condition are firstly considered, and its experiment results regarding the speed step response as well as the actual rotor FA and the estimated rotor FA are shown in Figure 11. Figure 11(a) shows that the motor speed gives a good dynamic response performance with a little oscillation and overshoot and it has 15 ms rising time. Figure 11(b) shows that the estimated FA can fast track the actual rotor FA even in the inverse speed command condition. Further, another experimental case while the PMSM running at medium speed (from 0 rpm → 300 rpm → 600 rpm → 900 rpm → 600 rpm → 900 rpm) condition is evaluated, and its experiment results are shown in Figure 12. The Figure 12(a) presents a fast speed tracking with 15 ms rising time and no occurrence of overshoot condition. Figure 12(b) shows a successful vector control due to the being controlled to zero. Therefore, from the simulation results in Figures 8 and 9 and the experimental results in Figures 11 and 12, it is demonstrated that the EKF-based estimation algorithm used in sensorless PMSM drive and the behavior description by using VHDL are effective and correct.

6. Conclusions

This study has presented a sensorless PMSM drive based on EKF and successfully demonstrated its performance through cosimulation by using Simulink/ModelSim and implementation by using FPGA. In realization aspect, the VHDL is used to describe the behavior of EKF algorithm, and FSM is used to reduce the FPGA resource usage; therefore, it only needs 4,158 LEs and 2,890 RAM bits. In computational power aspect, the operation time to complete the computation of EKF algorithm is only 10.48 μs, which is less than the 62.5 μs (16 KHz) sampling time in current control loop. In simulated and experimental results, it shows that the use of EKF in sensorless PMSM drive can accurately estimate the rotor FA and rotor speed, and it can give a good step response performance in case of low speed control, inverse speed control, and high speed control as well.


This work was supported by the National Science Council of China under Grant no. NSC 101-2221-E-218-039.


  1. V. C. Ilioudis and N. I. Margaris, “PMSM sensorless speed estimation based on sliding mode observers,” in Proceedings of the 39th IEEE Annual Power Electronics Specialists Conference (PESC '08), pp. 2838–2843, June 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. S. Chi, Z. Zhang, and L. Xu, “Sliding-mode sensorless control of direct-drive PM synchronous motors for washing machine applications,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 582–590, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. V. Delli Colli, R. di Stefano, and F. Marignetti, “A system-on-chip sensorless control for a permanent-magnet synchronous motor,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 57, no. 11, pp. 3822–3829, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. S. Bolognani, R. Oboe, and M. Zigliotto, “Sensorless full-digital pmsm drive with ekf estimation of speed and rotor position,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 184–191, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. M. C. Huang, A. J. Moses, and F. Anayi, “The comparison of sensorless estimation techniques for PMSM between extended Kalman filter and flux-linkage observer,” in Proceedings of the 21st Annual IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC '06), pp. 654–659, March 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  6. W. Wang, M. Zhang, and Q. Wu, “Application of reduced-order extended kalman filter in permanent magnet synchronous motor sensorless regulating system,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Digital Manufacturing and Automation (ICDMA '10), pp. 271–274, December 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. J.-S. Jang, B.-G. Park, T.-S. Kim, D. M. Lee, and D.-S. Hyun, “Parallel reduced-order extended Kalman Filter for PMSM sensorless drives,” in Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (IECON '08), pp. 1326–1331, November 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. Y.-S. Kung and M.-H. Tsai, “FPGA-based speed control IC for PMSM drive with adaptive fuzzy control,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 2476–2486, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. L. Idkhajine and E. Monmasson, “Design methodology for complex FPGA-based controllers—application to an EKF sensorless AC drive,” in Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Electrical Machines (ICEM '10), pp. 1–6, September 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. H.-H. Chou, Y.-S. Kung, N. Vu Quynh, and S. Cheng, “Optimized FPGA design, verification and implementation of a neuro-fuzzy controller for PMSM drives,” Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, vol. 90, pp. 28–44, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar | MathSciNet
  11. Y. S. Kung and T. H. Nguyen, “Simulink/Modelsim Co-simulation of EKF-based Sensorless PMSM drives,” in Proceedings of IEEE International on Power Electronics and Drive Systems (PEDS '13), pp. 709–713, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  12. Y. Li, J. Huo, X. Li, J. Wen, Y. Wang, and B. Shan, “An open-loop sin microstepping driver based on FPGA and the co-simulation of modelsim and simulink,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer, Mechatronics, Control and Electronic Engineering (CMCE '10), pp. 223–227, August 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. The Mathworks, “Matlab/Simulink Users Guide, Application Program Interface Guide,” 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  14. Modeltech, “ModelSim Reference Manual,” 2004. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2013 Ying-Shieh Kung et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.