Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 936468, 20 pages
Research Article

A GIS-Enabled Approach for Assessing Damage Potential of Levee Systems Based on Underlying Geology and River Morphology

Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA

Received 17 July 2013; Accepted 13 October 2013

Academic Editor: Anaxagoras Elenas

Copyright © 2013 Mustafa Saadi and Adda Athanasopoulos-Zekkos. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. ASCE, “Report Card for America’s Infrastructure,” 2013,
  2. DWR, “California department of water resources,” 2011,
  3. URS, “Technical memorandum—levee seismic vulnerability assessment methodology,” in Urban Levee Geotechnical Evaluations Program, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  4. K.-K. Phoon and F. H. Kulhawy, “On quantifying inherent soil variability, uncertainty in the geologic environment,” in Proceedings of the Analysis and Computation Specialty Conference, Madison, Wis, USA, 1996.
  5. N. D. Gordon, T. A. McMahon, B. L. Finlayson, C. J. Gippel, and R. J. Nathan, Stream Hydrology, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 2004.
  6. J. E. Mueller, “An introduction to the hydraulic and topographic sinuosity indexes 1,” Annals of the Association of American Geographers, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 371–385, 1968. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. Z. Deretsky, Ten Ways a Levee Can Fail, National Science Foundation, 2010.
  8. ASCE, So You Live Behind a Levee ?American Society of Civil Engineers, 2010.
  9. USGS, “United States national seismic hazard maps,” 2008,
  10. RESIN, “Resilient and sustainable infrastructure networks project (RESIN) at the University of California Berkeley,” 2011,
  11. DRMS, Initial Technical Framework Paper: Levee Fragility, Delta Risk Management Strategy, 2006.
  12. DRMS, Initial Technical Framework Paper: Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Risk Analysis (Approach and Basis of Analysis), Delta Risk Management Strategy, 2006.
  13. A. M. Athanasopoulos-Zekkos, Select topics on the static and dynamic response and performance of earthen levees [Ph.D. thesis], Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, Calif, USA, 2008.
  14. A. Athanasopoulos-Zekkos and R. B. Seed, “Simplified methodology for consideration of 2D dynamic response of levees in liquefaction triggering evaluation,” ASCE Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, vol. 139, no. 11, pp. 1911–1922, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  15. USACE, “Guidelines for the seismic evaluation of Levees,” ETL 1110-2-580, Department of the Army, Washington, DC, USA, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  16. FEMA, “FEMA-366: HAZUS-MH estimated annualized earthquake loss for the United States,” 2009,
  17. USACE, Levee Investigation, Reclamation District's 537 and 900 and Maintenance Areas 4 and 9, Sacramento River, Sacramento Bypass and Yolo Bypass, Yolo and Sacramento Counties, California, Department of the Army, Office of the Chief of Engineers, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 1987.
  18. F. H. Kulhawy and P. W. Mayne, “Manual on estimating soil properties for foundation design,” Tech. Rep. EL-6800, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, Calif, USA, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  19. R. B. Peck, W. E. Hanson, and T. H. Thornburn, Foundation Engineering, Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 1974.
  20. J. H. Schmertmann, “Measurement of in-situ shear strength,” in Proceedings of the Conference on In Situ Measurement of Soil Properties, vol. 2, pp. 57–138, American Society of Civil Engineers, Raleigh, NC, USA, 1975.
  21. M. Hatanaka and A. Uchida, “Empirical correlation between penetration resistance and internal friction angle of sandy soils,” Soils and Foundations, Japanese Geotechnical Society, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 1–9, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  22. G. B. Baecher and J. T. Christian, “Spatial variability and geotechnical engineering,” in Reliability Based Design in Geotechnical Engineering: Computations and Applications, K.-K. Phoon, Ed., Taylor & Francis, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  23. S. Lacasse and F. Nadim, “Uncertainties in characteristic soil properties,” in Proceedings of the ASCE Specialty Conference on Uncertainty in the Geologic Environment: From Theory to Practice, 2006.
  24. I. K. Lee, W. White, and O. G. Ingles, Geotechnical Engineering, Pitman, London, UK, 1983.
  25. P. Lumb, “The variability of natural soils,” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 74–97, 1966. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. P. Lumb, “Application of statistics in soil mechanics,” in Soil Mechanics: New Horizons, I. K. Lee, Ed., chapter 3, American Elsevier, 2nd edition, 1974. View at Google Scholar
  27. J. Christian and G. Baecher, “Unresolved problems in geotechnical risk and reliability,” in Proceedings of the ASCE Geotechnical Risk Assessment and Management Conference (GeoRisk '11), pp. 50–63, American Society of Civil Engineers, Atlanta, Ga, USA, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. G. A. Fenton and D. V. Griffiths, Risk Assessment in Geotechnical Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 2008.
  29. J. R. Hess, G. L. Sills, R. Costa, and S. Shewbridge, “California's levees at risk,” Geo-Strata—Geo Institute of ASCE, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 24–28, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  30. USGS, “National map viewer,” 2010,
  31. E. J. Helley and D. S. Harwood, Geologic Map of the Late Cenozoic Deposits of the Sacramento Valley and Northern Sierran Foothills California, Miscellaneous Field Studies Map MF-1790, U.S. Geological Survey, 1985.
  32. J. F. Mount, California Rivers and Streams: The Conflict Between Fluvial Process and Land Use, University of California Press, Berkeley, Calif, USA, 1995.
  33. P. Julien, River Mechanics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1st edition, 2002.
  34. C. R. Thorne, R. D. Hey, and M. D. Newson, Applied Fluvial Geomorphology for River Engineering and Management, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1997.
  35. L. B. Leopold, M. G. Wolman, and J. P. Miller, Fluvial Processes in Geomorphology, W. H. Freeman, Hampshire, UK, 1964.
  36. USGS, “National water information system: web interface,” 2011,
  37. URS, “Geotechnical investigation data for West Sacramento, American River, Marysville, Sutter, and RD784,” Personal Communication with Mr. Richard Millet, Vice President, Program Manager DWR Geo-Levee, URS Corporation, 2010.
  38. T. Lunne, P. K. Robertson, and J. J. M. Powell, Cone Penetration Testing in Geotechnical Practice, Blackie Academic & Professional, New York, NY, USA, 1997.
  39. P. K. Robertson and R. G. Campanella, “Interpretation of cone penetration tests. Part I: sand,” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 718–733, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. R. S. Olsen and J. K. Mitchell, “CPT stress normalization and prediction of soil classification,” in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing (CPT '95), Linkoping, Sweden, 1995.
  41. ASTM, 2011. ASTM Standard D2487-11, “Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (unified soil classification system),” Tech. Rep., ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pa, USA, 2003, View at Google Scholar