Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2014, Article ID 104064, 7 pages
Research Article

Mean-Variance-CvaR Model of Multiportfolio Optimization via Linear Weighted Sum Method

Faculty of Science, Department of Mathematics, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

Received 16 July 2013; Accepted 22 January 2014; Published 30 March 2014

Academic Editor: Hao Shen

Copyright © 2014 Younes Elahi and Mohd Ismail Abd Aziz. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. Y. Elahi and A. A. Mohd-Ismail, “Multi-objectives portfolio optimization, challenges and opportunities for islamic approach,” Australian Journal of Basic and Applaied Sicence, vol. 6, no. 10, pp. 297–302, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  2. I. Radziukynienė and A. Žilinskas, “Evolutionary methods for multi-objective portfolio optimization,” in Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering, 2008.
  3. C. Chiranjeevi and V. N. Sastry, “Multi objective portfolio optimization models and its solution using genetic algorithms,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Multimedia Applications (ICCIMA '07), December 2007.
  4. R. Aboulaich, R. Ellaia, and S. El Moumen, “The mean-variance-CVaR model for portfolio optimization modeling using a multi-objective approach based on a hybrid method,” Mathematical Modelling of Natural Phenomena, vol. 5, no. 7, pp. 103–108, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  5. D. Roman, K. Darby-Dowman, and G. Mitra, “Mean-risk models using two risk measures: a multi-objective approach,” Quantitative Finance, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 443–458, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  6. R. Armañanzas and J. A. Lozano, “A multiobjective approach to the portfolio optimization problem,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC '05), September 2005. View at Scopus
  7. D. Roman, K. Darby-Dowman, and G. Mitra, “Portfolio construction based on stochastic dominance and target return distributions,” Mathematical Programming, vol. 108, no. 2, pp. 541–569, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  8. L. Zadeh, “Optimality and non-scalar-valued performance criteria,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 59–60, 1963. View at Google Scholar
  9. K. Kirytopoulos, V. Leopoulos, G. Mavrotas, and D. Voulgaridou, “Multiple sourcing strategies and order allocation: an ANP-AUGMECON meta-model,” Supply Chain Management, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 263–276, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. O. Grodzevich and O. Romanko, “Normalization and other topics in multi-objective optimization,” 2006.
  11. J. Jia, G. W. Fischer, and J. S. Dyer, “Attribute weighting methods and decision quality in the presence of response error: a simulation study,” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 85–105, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. B. Sawik, “A reference point approach to bi-objective dynamic portfolio optimization,” Decision Making in Manufacturing and Services, vol. 3, no. 1-2, pp. 73–85, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  13. O. Romanko, A. Ghaffari-Hadigheh, and T. Terlaky, “Multiobjective optimization via parametric optimization: models, algorithms, and applications,” Modeling and Optimization, pp. 77–119, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  14. X. Yu, Y. Tan, L. Liu, and W. Huang, “The optimal portfolio model based on mean-CvaR with linear weighted sum method,” in Fifth International Joint Conference on Computational Sciences and Optimization (CSO '12), pp. 82–84, June 2012.
  15. J. Jahn, “Some characterizations of the optimal solutions of a vector optimization problem,” Operations-Research-Spektrum, vol. 7, pp. 7–17, 1985. View at Google Scholar
  16. X. Yu, H. Sun, and G. Chen, “The optimal portfolio model based on mean-CVaR,” Journal of Mathematical Finance, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 132–134, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  17. S. Uryasev, “Conditional value-at-risk: optimization algorithms and applications,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/IAFE/INFORNS 6th Conference on Computational Intelligence for Financial Engineering (CIFEr '00), pp. 49–57, March 2000. View at Scopus