Research Article
Efficient Stereo Matching with Decoupled Dissimilarity Measure Using Successive Weighted Summation
Table 2
Comparison of mismatch percentage among the proposed algorithm and several representative algorithms.
| Algorithms | Tsukuba | Venus | Teddy | Cones | Average percent of mismatch | nonocc. | all | disc. | nonocc. | all | disc. | nonocc. | all | disc. | nonocc. | all | disc. |
| SNCC [12] | 11.3 | 12.3 | 27.5 | 2.35 | 3.23 | 15.4 | 10.6 | 15.2 | 28.6 | 4.71 | 11.1 | 13.2 | 13.0 | HistAggr2 [10] | 15.2 | 15.7 | 16.4 | 6.44 | 7.00 | 12.5 | 11.5 | 18.2 | 24.4 | 7.90 | 13.7 | 14.2 | 13.6 | RTCensus [11] | 12.9 | 14.1 | 28.1 | 3.67 | 4.63 | 17.8 | 11.4 | 18.6 | 27.7 | 5.54 | 11.8 | 15.9 | 14.4 | InfoPerm [18] | 25.7 | 26.2 | 21.2 | 8.64 | 9.34 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 22.1 | 29.2 | 7.68 | 15.1 | 15.1 | 17.5 | AdaptWeight [9] | 18.1 | 18.8 | 18.6 | 7.77 | 8.40 | 15.8 | 17.6 | 23.9 | 34.0 | 14.0 | 19.7 | 20.6 | 18.1 | FeatureGC [13] | 8.22 | 8.86 | 13.3 | 4.58 | 4.73 | 10.1 | 14.7 | 17.0 | 32.5 | 11.5 | 18.0 | 21.0 | 13.7 | ObjectStereo [15] | 16.4 | 16.8 | 16.1 | 2.56 | 2.67 | 7.69 | 19.6 | 22.7 | 30.3 | 16.3 | 20.7 | 19.7 | 16.0 | AdaptingBP [16] | 19.1 | 19.3 | 17.4 | 4.84 | 5.08 | 7.84 | 12.8 | 16.7 | 26.3 | 7.02 | 13.2 | 14.0 | 13.6 | Proposed | 9.12 | 10.2 | 15.0 | 1.04 | 1.72 | 8.35 | 11.2 | 17.0 | 26.8 | 6.36 | 12.6 | 15.1 | 11.2 |
|
|
nonocc.: the pixels in the nonoccluded region; disc.: the visible pixels near the discontinuous regions.
|