#### Abstract

This paper is concerned with a reliable treatment of the Stephan problem with variable latent heat. The power series solutions have been presented. The method is examined for computational efficiency and accuracy. Also, an analytical solution based on a similarity variable is presented in the case when the Dirichlet boundary condition at the water-ice interface depends on time.

#### 1. Introduction

The solution of the Stefan problem with variable latent heat consists of finding and the moving melt interface such that which is the governing equation, subject to the following Neumann boundary condition at the left end of the domain describing the inlet heat flux: the Dirichlet boundary condition at the water-ice interface: the Stefan condition: and the initial temperature distribution: On comparison of this condition with the one-phase Stefan condition, we observe that the latent heat term is not a constant but, rather, a linear function of position [1]. Problems such as this have been treated under the name of Stefan problems with variable latent heat [1–3].

An analytical solution for this Stefan problem is presented in [1], by introducing the similarity variables and seeking the solution in the form with being an unknown function. Accordingly, it is natural that the interface location should be proportional to ; that is, , where is a constant.

The purpose of this paper is to apply the Adomian decomposition method [4–25] to find the solution of (1), (2), and (5), that is, the temperature distribution of the water , and then use a direct method to determine the position of the ice-water interface as a function of time. Also, an analytical solution based on a similarity variable is presented in the case when the Dirichlet boundary condition at the water-ice interface depends on time of the form , where is a constant.

#### 2. The Adomian Decomposition Method

Based on the Adomian decomposition method, we write (1) in Adomian’s operator-theoretic notation as where We conveniently define the inverse linear operator as Applying the inverse linear operator to (6) and taking into account that , we obtain where the unknown boundary condition will be determined.

Define the solution by an infinite series of components in the form Consequently, the components can be elegantly determined by setting the recursion scheme for the complete determination of these components. In view of (11), the components are immediately determined as Consequently, the solution is readily found to be obtained by substituting (12) into (10).

We remark here that the unknown boundary condition can be easily determined by using the initial condition equation (5). Substituting into (13) and using the Taylor expansion of lead to Equating the coefficients of like power of in both sides of (14) and taking into account that the compatibility conditions yield Thus Accordingly, the solution equation (13) is completely determined by defining the function .

Once the function is obtained, we can rewrite the Stefan condition equation (4) in terms of the known function including the Dirichlet and Neumann boundary conditions. For this, integrating (1) with respect to from to and taking into account that , we obtain Thus (4) can be replaced by Using the following Leibniz rule for differentiation under the integral sign: and taking into account that , we obtain Substituting (21) into (19), we obtain Since , we have Applying the inverse linear operator to (23), we obtain It follows that Substituting the solution equation (13) of the heat equation into (25), we obtain where Thus where We now can determine the shoreline with time by solving the nonlinear equation (28). In order to demonstrate the feasibility and efficiency of this method, we consider the following case: If we choose , then a simple calculation leads to , and (28) becomes where .

Let us write and in series forms and . Thus To compute we need the following theorem [4].

Theorem 1. *If and are convergent, then is convergent, where
**
and are the Adomian polynomials.*

Using this theorem with the given formula , we see that Consequently, we obtain the recurrence relations for the coefficients where and .

This solution, of course, is

#### 3. Similarity Solution

We begin our approach by introducing the similarity variable and look for solutions of (1) in the form where the number and the function are to be determined. Substituting (39) into (1) we find that and so This is also difficult to solve for arbitrary values of but for special values we can do something. Define , and thus (41) can be transformed into This has the general solution where and are constants, provided . Hence This gives a full solution for in the form Taking the spatial derivative of the solution given by (45) From the Neumann boundary condition at , we obtain It follows that must be a constant. Hence and from the Dirichlet condition we get Let , and thus (49) becomes The analytical solution based on a similarity variable [1] requires that . This means that does not depend on time. In this treatment we will assume that is a function of , that is, , where is a constant, which needs to be specified to realize an explicit solution. Thus Since in (51) is a constant, it follows that must also be constant. Thus The Stefan condition at the free boundary is where By putting (53) and (54) in the Stefan condition, we get the following transcendental equation: Thus we have proved the following theorem.

Theorem 2. *For the Stefan problem with variable latent heat
**
The solution is given by
**
where
*

#### Conflict of Interests

The author declares that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.