Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2014, Article ID 186502, 16 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/186502
Research Article

Power Geometric Operators of Hesitant Multiplicative Fuzzy Numbers and Their Application to Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making

College of Communications Engineering, PLA University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210007, China

Received 30 December 2013; Revised 9 April 2014; Accepted 9 April 2014; Published 6 May 2014

Academic Editor: Valentina Emilia Balas

Copyright © 2014 Lei Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. A. Orlovsky, “Decision-making with a fuzzy preference relation,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 155–167, 1978. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  2. B. de Baets, H. de Meyer, B. de Schuymer, and S. Jenei, “Cyclic evaluation of transitivity of reciprocal relations,” Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 217–238, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  3. T. L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 1980. View at MathSciNet
  4. D. Zhang, F. Xie, Y. Zhang, F. Dong, and K. Hirota, “Fuzzy analysis of community detection in complex networks,” Physica A, vol. 389, no. 22, pp. 5319–5327, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. Che, J. Wang, and G. Wang, “An adaptive fuzzy combination model based on self-organizing map and support vector regression for electric load forecasting,” Energy, vol. 37, pp. 657–664, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. E. Herrera-Viedma, S. Alonso, F. Chiclana, and F. Herrera, “A consensus model for group decision making with incomplete fuzzy preference relations,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 863–877, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. L. Zhou, H. Chen, and J. Liu, “Generalized power aggregation operators and their applications in group decision making,” Computers and Industrial Engineering, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 989–999, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. R. R. Yager, “On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision making,” EEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics B, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 183–190, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  9. R. R. Yager, “Generalized OWA aggregation operators,” Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 93–107, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  10. D. F. Li, “The GOWA operator based approach to multiattribute decision making using intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” Mathematical and Computer Modelling, vol. 53, no. 5-6, pp. 1182–1196, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  11. D. F. Li, “Multiattribute decision making method based on generalized OWA operators with intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 37, no. 12, pp. 8673–8678, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. D.-F. Li, L.-L. Wang, and G.-H. Chen, “Group decision making methodology based on the Atanassov's intuitionistic fuzzy set generalized OWA operator,” International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 801–817, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  13. Z. Xu and R. R. Yager, “Some geometric aggregation operators based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” International Journal of General Systems, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 417–433, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  14. Z. Xu, “Multi-person multi-attribute decision making models under intuitionistic fuzzy environment,” Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 221–236, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  15. G. W. Wei, “Some geometric aggregation functions and their application to dynamic multiple attribute decision making in the intuitionistic fuzzy setting,” International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 179–196, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  16. Y. Xu and H. Wang, “The induced generalized aggregation operators for intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their application in group decision making,” Applied Soft Computing Journal, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 1168–1179, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. G. Wei and X. Zhao, “Some induced correlated aggregating operators with intuitionistic fuzzy information and their application to multiple attribute group decision making,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 2026–2034, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. Z. X. Su, G. P. Xia, M. Y. Chen, and L. Wang, “Induced generalized intuitionistic fuzzy OWA operator for multi-attribute group decision making,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 1902–1910, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. Z. Xu, “Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1179–1187, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. M. Xia and Z. Xu, “Hesitant fuzzy information aggregation in decision making,” International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 395–407, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  21. Z. S. Xu, M. Xia, and N. Chen, “Some hesitant fuzzy aggregation operators with their application in group decision making,” Group Decision and Negotiation, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 259–279, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  22. G. Qian, H. Wang, and X. Feng, “Generalized hesitant fuzzy sets and their application in decision support system,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 37, pp. 357–376, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  23. R. R. Yager, “The power average operator,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics A, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 724–731, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. Z. Xu and R. R. Yager, “Power-geometric operators and their use in group decision making,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 94–105, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. L. Zhou and H. Chen, “A generalization of the power aggregation operators for linguistic environment and its application in group decision making,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 26, pp. 216–224, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. Z. Xu, “Approaches to multiple attribute group decision making based on intuitionistic fuzzy power aggregation operators,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 749–760, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. Z. Zhang, “Generalized Atanassov's intuitionistic fuzzy power geometric operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making,” Information Fusion, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 460–486, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  28. Z. S. Xu and X. Q. Cai, “Uncertain power average operators for aggregating interval fuzzy preference relations,” Group Decision and Negotiation, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 381–397, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. Y. J. Xu and H. M. Wang, “Approaches based on 2-tuple linguistic power aggregation operators for multiple attribute group decision making under ling uistic environment,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 3988–3997, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. S.P. Wan, “Power average operators of trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and application to multi-attribute group decision making,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 4112–4126, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  31. Z. Zhang, “Hesitant fuzzy power aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making,” Information Sciences, vol. 234, pp. 150–181, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  32. M. Xia and Z. S. Xu, “Managing hesitant information in GDM problems under fuzzy and multiplicative preference relations,” International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 865–897, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  33. V. Torra, “Hesitant fuzzy sets,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 529–539, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. S. Miyamoto, “Multisets and fuzzy multisets,” in Soft Computing and Human-Centered Machines, Z. Q. Liu and S. Miyamoto, Eds., pp. 9–33, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  35. S. Miyamoto, “Fuzzy multisets and their generalizations,” in Multiset Processing, C. S. Caludeetal, Ed., vol. 2235 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 225–235, Springer, Berlin, Berlin, Germany, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  36. R. R. Yager, “On the theory of bags,” International Journal of General Systems, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 23–37, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  37. Y. Jiang, Z. Xu, and X. Yu, “Compatibility measures and consensus models for group decision making with intuitionistic multiplicative preference relations,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 13, pp. 2075–2086, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  38. L. Wang, M. Ni, and L. Zhu, “Correlation measures of dual hesitant fuzzy sets,” Journal of Applied Mathematics, vol. 2013, Article ID 593739, 13 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  39. B. Zhu, Z. Xu, and M. Xia, “Dual hesitant fuzzy sets,” Journal of Applied Mathematics, vol. 2012, Article ID 879629, 13 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  40. J. M. Merigó and A. M. Gil-Lafuente, “The induced generalized OWA operator,” Information Sciences. An International Journal, vol. 179, no. 6, pp. 729–741, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  41. H. W. Liu and G. J. Wang, “Multi-criteria decision-making methods based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 179, no. 1, pp. 220–233, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. Z. Xu and M. Xia, “Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy sets,” Information Sciences, vol. 181, no. 11, pp. 2128–2138, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  43. C. M. Pintea, C. P. Sitar, M. Hajdu-Macelaru, and P. Petrica, “A hybrid classical approach to a fixed-charged transportation problem,” Hybrid Artificial Intelligent Systems, Springer, vol. 7208, pp. 557–566, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. S. Molla-Alizadeh-Zavardehi, M. Hajiaghaei-Keshteli, and R. Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, “Solving a capacitated fixed-charge transportation problem by artificial immune and genetic algorithms with a Prüfer number representation,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 10462–10474, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus