Optimization for Cavitation Inception Performance of Pump-Turbine in Pump Mode Based on Genetic Algorithm
Cavitation is a negative factor of hydraulic machinery because of its undesirable effects on the operation stability and safety. For reversible pump-turbines, the improvement of cavitation inception performance in pump mode is very important due to the strict requirements. The geometry of blade leading edge is crucial for the local flow separation which affects the scale and position of pressure drop. Hence, the optimization of leading edge shape is helpful for the improvement of cavitation inception performance. Based on the genetic algorithm, optimization under multiple flow rate conditions was conducted by modifying the leading edge ellipse ratio and blade thickness on the front 20% meanline. By using CFD simulation, optimization was completed with obvious improvements on the cavitation inception performance. CFD results show that the pressure drop location had moved downstream with the increasement of the minimum pressure coefficient. Experimental verifications also got an obvious enhancement of cavitation inception performance. The stability and safety was improved by moving the cavitation inception curve out of the operating range. This optimization is proved applicable and effective for the engineering applications of reversible pump-turbines.
Cavitation is a common dangerous phenomenon in hydraulic machinery, usually causing vibration, noise, and damage. As a consequence, it affects the stability and safety seriously. Reversible pump-turbines usually have higher speeds and heads than typical centrifugal pumps and are more likely to experience large-scale cavitation with tremendous negative impacts. Moreover, the cavitation coefficient in pump-mode is much greater than that in turbine-mode. Often, critical cavitation data are obtained by measuring the external characteristics. However, before the conditions reach the “critical cavitation” conditions, in the impeller, the actual extent of the cavitation is already quite serious. For the above reasons, the cavitation inception in pump-mode is often regarded as the crucial factor. Hence, improving the cavitation inception performance of a reversible pump-turbine is obviously important in engineering applications.
For pumps, the minimum pressure point is usually located in the leading edge (LE) of the blade. As a consequence, the inception cavitation often manifests as LE cavitation. LE cavitation in hydraulic turbomachinery has received great attention and been widely investigated by researchers based on experiments and CFD simulations [1–5]. Arakeri  pointed out that the cavitation inception at LE is related to the position of flow separation. Flow separation occurs when the boundary layer lifts off or separates from the surface due to the geometry [7, 8]. In practical applications, researchers modified the geometry of LE to improve cavitation performances of pumps and inducers [9–11]. But targeted optimization for the cavitation inception performance of pump-turbine is still unresolved in engineering applications.
As a common optimization method, the genetic algorithm (GA) is famous for its global optimization and parallel computing capabilities  and has been applied to the dynamics optimizations of pumps, compressors, and wind turbines [13–15]. In this study, GA is used to search the optimal LE geometry to improve the cavitation inception performance of pump-turbine in pump mode. The optimized pump-turbine model is expected to change the position of local separation especially under off-design conditions, slow down the dramatic pressure drop near LE, and enhance the safety and stability of pump-turbine units.
2. Application Example
2.1. Model and Parameterization
In this study, a pump-turbine which has seriously bad cavitation performance was put into optimization. This pump-turbine has a 9-blade mixed flow impeller whose meridional shape is shown in Figure 1. Moreover, the details of performance parameters and geometry parameters are shown in Table 1.
As the optimized object, the LE geometry was parameterized for controlling. Figure 2 shows the parameterization of LE shape. The thickness values on the front 20% meanline and the LE ellipse were controlled. So there were 6 parameters including the thickness at 0%, 4%, 8%, 12%, and 16% meanline length and the LE ellipse ratio. To apply the GA, the original values and variation range of all the 6 parameters were determined and shown in Table 2.
2.2. Optimization Method
After the parameterization of LE geometry of impeller, the initial generation was created randomly in the variation range with 10 individuals. These individuals were encoded with 42-digit binary code (7 digits for each parameter). The binary code and the parameter values could be converted following the rule below: where is the decimal value of parameter, and are the lower and upper limit of the variation range, is the digit number of binary code per parameter (here ), and is the corresponding decimal value of the binary code. The binary code had a numerical precision of 0.1 for the ellipse ratio, 0.024 for the thickness at 0%, and 0.047 for the thickness at other locations.
As mentioned above, the minimum pressure coefficient in the impeller was chosen as the fitness function to evaluate the cavitation inception performance. To compare the minimum pressure between different impeller geometries, the dimensionless pressure coefficient was defined and is shown below: where is the pressure, and are the reference pressure and velocity, and is the density of water. The reference pressure and velocity values were acquired at the impeller inlet.
In this study, three different operating conditions including 360 kg/s, 450 kg/s (the design condition, ), and 540 kg/s were taken into consideration. The fitness function is defined as follows: where denotes the number of operating conditions which is 3 in this study. The argument is the weight of under different conditions. Because of the worse cavitation performance under off-design conditions, (the weight of kg/s) was set as 0.2 and (the weight of 360 kg/s) and (the weight of 540 kg/s) were set as 0.4.
Considering the nonlinearity in this study, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) tools were used as the solver of fitness function. So, modeling and meshing of the flow domain were proceeded before the solving. A single blade passage was modeled as the flow domain. Then, structural hexahedral elements were used in the meshing of domain. A mesh independence check was conducted to guarantee the computational accuracy. The mesh schemes from 11935 to 57750 nodes were checked by comparing the minimum pressure coefficient on the blade surfaces under the design condition. The variation of value became less than 1% when the mesh node increased to 44537. Moreover, the value was controlled within the range of 16 to 583 by setting the height of near-wall mesh elements to 3 mm. So, wall function could be used in the CFD solving of near-wall region. Finally, the mesh scheme with about 45000 mesh nodes was used. The Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes equations were solved with SST turbulence model . In the definition of boundary conditions, the impeller inflow was set as mass flow inlet. The impeller outflow was set as pressure outlet with the static pressure of 0 Pa. Impeller hub, shroud, and blades were set as no slip wall. Rotational periodic boundaries were given for the simplification of simulation. The schematic map of domain, mesh, and boundary conditions are shown in Figure 3.
After the CFD simulation processes, the individual who had the lowest value was eliminated and the vacancy was filled by the copy of the sample who had the highest value. In the setting of genetic operations, the crossover rate was set as 0.65 and the mutation rate was set as 0.1. Optimization would converge when the residual of the fitness function of the best individual became less than . The schematic map of the whole optimization process is shown in Figure 4.
2.3. Optimization Monitoring and Results
In the solving of fitness function for all the 10 individuals, optimization was running in a parallel way. Every impeller individual was simulated in a standalone CFD progress. Then, fitness function values were transferred to a terminal machine for the genetic operations. The monitoring of fitness function of all the 10 individuals is shown in Figure 5. After 20 generations, the optimization converged with the values increasing to a higher level. Individual-9 who has the highest value was chosen as the final optimized impeller. The comparisons of LE geometry between the optimized and the original impeller are shown in Figure 6.
3. Verifications and Analysis
3.1. Cavitation Inception Performance
To verify the improvement of cavitation inception performance, both the original and optimized impellers were put into cavitation experiments and CFD simulations. The cavitation inception experiments were conducted on the hydraulic test rig shown in Figure 7. The high-speed camera was used as the measurement device of cavitation bubbles. A “3-bubble” criterion was used to identify cavitation inception. By lowering the ambient pressure with the vacuum pump, cavitation bubbles occurred near the blade LE as shown in Figure 7(b). When 3 bubbles appeared, the cavitation inception coefficient was recorded which is defined as where is the density of water, is the acceleration of gravity, is the vapor pressure, and denote the pressure and velocity at the reference position (impeller inflow), and denotes the head of pump-turbine.
(a) Test rig
(b) Capturing the cavitation bubbles
In the cavitation inception simulations, mass transfer was turned on to make the cavitation happen. The saturation pressure is set to 3500 Pa under the reference pressure of 1 Atm. By lowering the pressure value at impeller outlet, cavitation occurred in the impeller. The cavitation inception criterion was set as an average vapor volume fraction of 0.01% in the impeller domain. Figure 8 shows the experimental and numerical values under different flow rate conditions.
As shown in Figure 8, if the curve goes across the operating range, cavitation would happen because the pressure may drop below the vapor pressure. Experimental data show that the curve went across the range under off-design conditions before optimization. After optimizing the blade LE shape, even the value increased under the design flow rate condition ( kg/s) and the cavitation inception had also been improved because decreased under all the off-design conditions with the curve getting out of the range. It is necessary to study the mechanism of cavitation inception performance optimization. As shown in Figure 8, the numerical simulation had obtained a consistent variation tendency of with the experimental data. So, it is reasonable to study and analyze the flow details through the CFD simulation results.
3.2. Pressure Drop at Leading Edge
To study the flow details near blade LE, the velocity vectors and pressure contour on the spanwise 50% surface under the design condition are plotted in Figure 9. Seen from the vectors, fluid flowed around the blade LE and separated from the side surface. Adverse pressure gradient generated and induced the pressure drop. Before optimization, the pressure drop was very abrupt because of the mutational geometry. After optimization, the impeller got a bigger thickness around the LE. Hence, the pressure drop became gentle with the minimum pressure point moving downstream. To analyze the pressure drop in detail, the pressure coefficient distributions on the front 2% meanline are plotted in Figure 10.
|(a) /s (0.8)|
|(b) /s (1.0)|
|(c) /s (1.2)|
Seen from Figure 10, pressure drop occurred on the front 2% meanline on the spanwise 20%, 50%, and 80% surfaces. As illustrated in Figure 10, the minimum pressure coefficient increased under all the 3 flow rate conditions except on the spanwise 50% surface of kg/s condition. This is due to the setting of weight of under different conditions in the fitness function (3). In this optimization, it focused more on the cavitation inception performance under off-design conditions. Even the cavitation coefficient increased at the flow rate of kg/s after optimization (shown in Figure 8); this optimization was also globally successful for improving the cavitation inception performance under the poor-performing conditions.
3.3. Impacts on Hydrodynamic Performances
Considering the impacts on external characteristics after the optimization of LE shape, additional studies were carried out by analyzing the variation of head and efficiency. Figure 11 shows the comparison curves of head and efficiency between original impeller and optimized impeller. In Figure 11, the CFD head values are the impeller head and the experimental head is the head of the whole passage. The CFD efficiency is the hydraulic efficiency of the impeller and the experimental efficiency is the total efficiency of the whole passage. Both and decreased after the optimization of LE. However, CFD and experimental changed by less than 0.986% and 1.059%, respectively. Also, CFD and experiment decreased by less than 0.237% and 0.180%, respectively. There were just little changes on the head and efficiency. It means that the optimization was applicable and effective.
With the genetic algorithm, the optimization on cavitation inception performance of a pump-turbine in pump mode had been conducted. The geometry of LE had been modified after optimization. By both the CFD simulation and the verification experiment, the optimization had been proved effective with conclusions drawn as follows.
As a widely used optimization method, the genetic algorithm was used in this study to solve the nonlinear problem. After optimization, the impeller got a better cavitation performance than before. The optimization was helpful to control the local separation. With the optimized LE geometry, flow separation near leading edge was weakened and postponed to downstream. The tendency of pressure drop became gentle especially under the off-design conditions. Moreover, the minimum pressure coefficients increased after optimization. Hence, this optimization was proved excellent for improving the cavitation inception performance of pump-turbines in pump mode. It is reasonable and applicable for relevant engineering applications.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support given by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 51139007) and National “Twelfth Five-Year” Plan for Science & Technology Support (no. 2012BAD08B03).
C. E. Brennen, Hydrodynamics of Pumps, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2011.
X. Li, S. Yuan, Z. Pan, J. Yuan, and Y. Fu, “Numerical simulation of leading edge cavitation within the whole flow passage of a centrifugal pump,” Science China Technological Sciences, vol. 56, no. 9, pp. 2156–2162, 2013.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. J. Li, Y. Z. Pan, Q. D. Zhang et al., “Centrifugal pump performance drop due to leading edge cavitation,” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 15, no. 3, Article ID 032058, 2012.View at: Google Scholar
D. Pierrat, L. Gros, A. Couzinet et al., “On the leading edge cavitation in a helico-centifugal pump: experimental and numerical investigations,” in Proceedings of the 3rd IAHR International Meeting of the Workgroup on Cavitation and Dynamic Problems in Hydraulic Machinery and Systems, 2009.View at: Google Scholar
T. Sudsuansee, U. Nontakaew, and Y. Tiaple, “Simulation of leading edge cavitation on bulb turbine,” Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 51–60, 2011.View at: Google Scholar
V. H. Arakeri, “Viscous effects on the position of cavitation separation from smooth bodies,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 779–799, 1975.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Gad-el-Hak and D. M. Bushnell, “Separation control: review,” Journal of Fluids Engineering, Transactions of the ASME, vol. 113, no. 1, pp. 5–30, 1991.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. P. Patel, Z. H. Sowie, T. C. Corke, and C. He, “Autonomous sensing and control of wing stall using a smart plasma slat,” Journal of Aircraft, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 516–527, 2007.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Cervone, G. Pace, L. Torre et al., “Effects of the leading edge shape on the performance of an axial three bladed inducer[C],” in Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Transport Phenomena and Dynamics of Rotating Machinery, 2012.View at: Google Scholar
O. Coutier-Delgosha, J.-L. Reboud, and R. Fortes-Patella, “Numerical study of the effect of the leading edge shape on cavitation around inducer blade sections,” JSME International Journal, Series B: Fluids and Thermal Engineering, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 678–685, 2002.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Pierrat, L. Gros, G. Pintrand et al., “Experimental and numerical investigations of leading edge cavitation in a helico-centrifugal pump,” in Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium of Transport Phenomena and Dynamics on Rotating Machinery, pp. 17–22, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, February 2008.View at: Google Scholar
Z. Michalewicz, Genetic Algorithms + Data Structures = Evolution Programs, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1996.
R. Xiao and Z. Wang, “Centrifugal pump blade optimization based on a combined optimization strategy,” Journal of Tsinghua University, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 700–703, 2006.View at: Google Scholar
J. Luo, C. Zhou, and F. Liu, “Multipoint design optimization of a transonic compressor blade by using an adjoint method,” Journal of Turbomachinery, vol. 136, no. 5, Article ID 051005, 2013.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Xiong, C. Yan, and Y. Zhiquan, “Application of genetic algorithms to HAWT rotor blades optimization,” Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 180–185, 2006.View at: Google Scholar
F. R. Menter, M. Kuntz, and R. Langtry, “Ten years of industrial experience with the SST turbulence model,” Turbulence, Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 4, pp. 625–632, 2003.View at: Google Scholar