Research Article
Nurse Scheduling Using Genetic Algorithm
Table 6
Comparison between real situation and simulation model.
| Department | Calculated result | AVG number of patients receiving service | AVG number of patients waiting longer than AVG time | AVG number of patients waiting less than AVG time | Percentage of patients waiting longer than AVG time |
| SUR | Real situation | 59 | 0.2 | 58 | 0.338% | Simulation | 61.63 ± 1.63 | 0.19 ± 0.36 | 60.51 1.66 | 0.196 0.32% | % error | 4.27% | 5.26% | 4.33% | — |
| MED | Real situation | 96 | 0 | 98 | 0% | Simulation | 98.79 ± 1.91 | 0 ± 0 | 97.94 ± 1.91 | 0% | % error | 2.90% | 0% | 0.06% | — |
| PED | Real situation | 55 | 0 | 53 | 0% | Simulation | 57.58 ± 1.48 | 0 ± 0 | 56.69 ± 1.46 | 0% | % error | 4.69% | 0% | 6.96% | — |
| EENT | Real situation | 53 | 18.2 | 34 | 34.34% | Simulation | 54.46 ± 1.76 | 16.73 ± 4.14 | 36.64 ± 3.46 | 19.99 ± 5.12% | % error | 2.75% | 8.07% | 7.76% | — |
| OBG | Real situation | 34 | 0 | 35 | 0% | Simulation | 38.4 ± 0.85 | 0 0 | 37.7 ± 0.84 | 0% | % error | 12.94% | 0% | 7.71% | — |
|
|